Was X's attack on Y after Z morally justified?

[Surrealistik]

YOU decide. Discuss.

[Ancalagon]

Xykon does not attack himself and there's no Zykon, thus... I do not get what this thread is about... *blink*

[Jan Mattys]

Hell no.

That poor Y sure didn't deserve that treatment!!!

...it was all K's fault!

[Sereg]

No, but not for the reasons that most people think. It's not because X should never have attacked Z in the first place! /Rant

[factotum]

What I really want to know is what W stood to gain from the whole thing...

[Ehra]

What I really want to know is what W stood to gain from the whole thing...

You're forgetting that 789.

[NerfTW]

We get it, there are some ridiculous debates lately. Don't add to them by contributing to this nonsense debate spam.

[DBJack]

You're all wrong. It's a question of allignment. If you pause to consider that Y is lawful instead of neutral then the whole arguement shifts to Z's actions instead.

[Querzis]

You're forgetting that 789.

Of course, it all make sense now. Hopefully, C and H will be able to stop them before his plans come to fruition otherwise W will conquer the world!

But about to the original question, I agree with DBJack. Z was the real villain here. X was just doing his job.

[Roland St. Jude]

Sheriff of Moddingham: Thread locked.