Was Mr Scruffy's calling of dibs on the string morally justified?

[archon_huskie]

After all, is it truly fair to call dibs when the string should go to the ones with the greatest need?

[Rhydeble]

No, loot always go's to the guy who calls dibs first.

[Foryn Gilnith]

With Belkar as a statement's messenger, I somewhat doubt that anything involved is morally justified.

[Ancalagon]

If you want to be funny and cool with starting a new thread, please, please come up with something on your own...

[Zanaril]

Actually, this time it made me laugh.

But if anyone else does it, it'll be too much.

[archon_huskie]

Please stay on topic. We are discussing the economic disparity caused by perpetuating a system that gives to those with the greatest want rather than the greatest need.

[Onyavar]

No, loot always go's to the guy who calls dibs first.

But it was Haley who looted the string!
So, if she needs the string to fix her shoelaces, which were ripped apart by Mister Scruffy (oh, youre a BAD CAT, Mr Scruffy), this white furry monster has no right to call dibs, especially on the precious string.

just my 2 eurocents

And here comes my 3rd eurocent:
Haley has all moral rights to keep the treasure she looted!
Well, at least this is the way it SHOULD be (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0029.html). For some strange reasons, she sometimes had to share with partmembers - I doubt that Roys oppression towards Haley (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0129.html) is morally justified, too! So the humble question of the OP questions the whole loot dividing system of the OotS, too!

[Ancalagon]

Please stay on topic.

There*s a topic? ;)

[Roland St. Jude]

Sheriff of Moddingham: As previously mentioned, stop with the spammy parody (or is it "parroty") threads.