shouldnt OOTS be 4.0 by now

[captin-caveman]

very confusing

[Berserk Monk]

very confusing

Rich said he wasn't converting the OotS because the new abilities the characters gain would make it difficult to continue the story.

[theinsulabot]

short version, no

long version, hell no.

[Kish]

very confusing

http://www.giantitp.com/index.html#jnOTTPCxjbGSbKnPpyT Scroll down to the post on May 20th, 2008.

[Katana_Geldar]

It's not as if people have stopped playing 3.5.

Though I have wondered what 4.0 OOTS would be like.

What would be good to see are some 4E NPCs

[captin-caveman]

Thats insulting I play 3.5 4.0 is tooooooooooo complicated even though being Drow is awesome

[Porthos]

very confusing

Not really. WotC themselves said that people should finish their campaigns before moving on to 4e.

Well, it just so happens that Rich's "campaign" is going to take a long time to finish. :smalltongue:

[Katana_Geldar]

I play 4.0 because I started with SW Saga, so it was a natural step. But let's not get hung up on which edition is the best/worst.

Can anyone answer my question?

[Mystic Muse]

I play 4.0 because I started with SW Saga, so it was a natural step. But let's not get hung up on which edition is the best/worst.

Can anyone answer my question?

V wouldn't be as powerful
haley would be about the same I think.
Roy would be better
Belkar still wouldn't make sense
Durkon would be the same
Elan would be more than halfway competent.

[theinsulabot]

oh, nevermind, i got it

[DnDgeek13]

short version, no

long version, hell no.

In a word, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

i truthfully like 3.5 and have a dislike for 4.0

[Roland St. Jude]

Sheriff of Moddingham: The non-conversion of OotS to 4e was announced on the News page a while back. So should be or shouldn't be don't enter into it.