ambu
2009-12-04, 11:28 AM
For some time now, I had an idea on how campaigns can be made more vibrant and I would like to share it with you. It is about looking on actual history for inspiration in order to add finishing touches to world.
Two different responses can be immediately made. The first one is that history is over-hyped and that not all campaigns want, need, or can be bothered to have a professional historian standing by in order to be fun. Of course, this is true. All I want to say is how, if one is interested, some things can be framed in a more authentically feeling way.
The second is the exact opposite, that is to say that the idea is not new. And of course it really isn't. From the early days of DnD, cosmology was somewhat based on Aristotelian and early medieval depictions of the universe. The four elements, the concentric circles of the multiverse etc etc are proof. Even more generally, in this forum, the Giant has shown how can one take inspiration from real world historical events. I am a great fan of this technique and it is certainly not mine. But what I want to do is specifically get inspirations from history of science and culture for a campaign.
If you are with me so far and you haven't fainted from my verbosity, I will present my ideas for these specific elements:
Maps, books, art, disciplines and education
Maps
The medieval maps were nothing like the ones we have today. They did not aim at represent the world as it is nor where there tools to do so. However, in most games maps are accurate, perfect in their details and lack just the GPS device to be modern. The same in kingdoms and armies: All have large maps that they use in order to administrate effectively or fight a war.
But this is not how it went. Maps often represented the world as it should be, not as it was. Earth was depicted in the shape of the cross or as the bible described it. Generals and administrators did not use maps but relied on local knowledge. Map was something like a symbolic, not an actual, representation. Far more common were the 'periplous', were books described what a traveler would find in a journey by boat to a continent or sea. And of course, fact and myth went hand in hand.
Uses in a campaign:
What if the map of the treasure for the party was created by elves? What if it thus implicitly draws on elven religion and players can't make heads or tails of it? Do they search for an elven scholar?
What if the general of the army wants the party to approach the locals in order to learn about the prospective battleground? What if they have to stop the enemy from doing so? What if they have to race to a distant monastery in order to protect the only 'map' made by humans?
What if the party have to protect a geographical mission (for later dates)? What if they are involved in a dispute within scholars because a school of thought within the Church deems the other heretical for making depicting, non symbolic maps?
What if the party is sent to find a place through using a 'periplous'? Places described are simply not there, information is outright false or strikingly accurate and the destination described is fictional or quire different. What then?
Books
Here things are more mainstream. Everybody knows that books were bulky, handmade and very very rare, acting as sources of power. But it is the conventional view that spells usually go around that problem easily. But what if they don't? Maybe mages can't be bothered to translate books not of their interest. Maybe some are written by heathens and thus kept secret for theological reasons. Maybe they are not just available in a civilization and some scholar needs a tome desperately enough to hire a party to get it. From a foreign, hostile and heathen civilization.
Finally, literacy was really not widespread at all. Only educated people (like priests and nobles and only later, some merchants) knew how to read. By most adventuring parties find notes, directions etc etc everywhere. Why? Maybe peasants are forbidden from learning such things. Maybe a note is already a biased object: The writer knows that whoever finds it will be of a certain social strata. That also means that a message needs to have a courier or a crier to go from city to city.
More coming if people are interested
Two different responses can be immediately made. The first one is that history is over-hyped and that not all campaigns want, need, or can be bothered to have a professional historian standing by in order to be fun. Of course, this is true. All I want to say is how, if one is interested, some things can be framed in a more authentically feeling way.
The second is the exact opposite, that is to say that the idea is not new. And of course it really isn't. From the early days of DnD, cosmology was somewhat based on Aristotelian and early medieval depictions of the universe. The four elements, the concentric circles of the multiverse etc etc are proof. Even more generally, in this forum, the Giant has shown how can one take inspiration from real world historical events. I am a great fan of this technique and it is certainly not mine. But what I want to do is specifically get inspirations from history of science and culture for a campaign.
If you are with me so far and you haven't fainted from my verbosity, I will present my ideas for these specific elements:
Maps, books, art, disciplines and education
Maps
The medieval maps were nothing like the ones we have today. They did not aim at represent the world as it is nor where there tools to do so. However, in most games maps are accurate, perfect in their details and lack just the GPS device to be modern. The same in kingdoms and armies: All have large maps that they use in order to administrate effectively or fight a war.
But this is not how it went. Maps often represented the world as it should be, not as it was. Earth was depicted in the shape of the cross or as the bible described it. Generals and administrators did not use maps but relied on local knowledge. Map was something like a symbolic, not an actual, representation. Far more common were the 'periplous', were books described what a traveler would find in a journey by boat to a continent or sea. And of course, fact and myth went hand in hand.
Uses in a campaign:
What if the map of the treasure for the party was created by elves? What if it thus implicitly draws on elven religion and players can't make heads or tails of it? Do they search for an elven scholar?
What if the general of the army wants the party to approach the locals in order to learn about the prospective battleground? What if they have to stop the enemy from doing so? What if they have to race to a distant monastery in order to protect the only 'map' made by humans?
What if the party have to protect a geographical mission (for later dates)? What if they are involved in a dispute within scholars because a school of thought within the Church deems the other heretical for making depicting, non symbolic maps?
What if the party is sent to find a place through using a 'periplous'? Places described are simply not there, information is outright false or strikingly accurate and the destination described is fictional or quire different. What then?
Books
Here things are more mainstream. Everybody knows that books were bulky, handmade and very very rare, acting as sources of power. But it is the conventional view that spells usually go around that problem easily. But what if they don't? Maybe mages can't be bothered to translate books not of their interest. Maybe some are written by heathens and thus kept secret for theological reasons. Maybe they are not just available in a civilization and some scholar needs a tome desperately enough to hire a party to get it. From a foreign, hostile and heathen civilization.
Finally, literacy was really not widespread at all. Only educated people (like priests and nobles and only later, some merchants) knew how to read. By most adventuring parties find notes, directions etc etc everywhere. Why? Maybe peasants are forbidden from learning such things. Maybe a note is already a biased object: The writer knows that whoever finds it will be of a certain social strata. That also means that a message needs to have a courier or a crier to go from city to city.
More coming if people are interested