PDA

View Full Version : Inmate fails d20 Charisma check.



Stealthdozer
2010-01-25, 11:47 PM
Inmate loses fight to play Dungeons & Dragons
By Scott Bauer, The Associated Press

Madison, Wisconsin - A man serving life in prison for first-degree intentional homicide lost his legal battle Monday to play Dungeons & Dragons behind bars.

Kevin T. Singer filed a federal lawsuit against officials at Wisconsin’s Waupun prison, arguing that a policy banning all Dungeons & Dragons material violated his free speech and due process rights.

Prison officials instigated the Dungeons & Dragons ban among concerns that playing the game promoted gang-related activity and was a threat to security. Singer challenged the ban but the Seventh US Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday upheld it as a reasonable policy.

Dungeons & Dragons players create fictional characters and carry out their adventures, often working together as a group, with the help of complicated rules.

Singer, 33, has been a devoted player of the fantasy role-playing game since he was a child, according to the court ruling. After the ban went into effect, prison officials confiscated dozens of Dungeons & Dragons books and magazines in his cell as well as a 96-page manuscript he had written detailing a potential scenario for the game that players could act out.

Prison officials enacted the ban in 2004 after an inmate sent an anonymous letter expressing concern about Singer and three other inmates forming a “gang” focused around playing the game.

Singer was told by prison officials that he could not keep the materials because Dungeons&Dragons “promotes fantasy role playing, competitive hostility, violence, addictive escape behaviours, and possible gambling,” according to the ruling. The prison later developed a more comprehensive policy against all types of fantasy games, the court said.

The appeals court said the prison’s policy was reasonable and did not violate Singer’s rights.

“After all, punishment is a fundamental aspect of imprisonment, and prisons may choose to punish inmates by preventing them from participating in some of their favourite recreations,” the court said.

Singer was sentenced to life in prison in 2002 after being found guilty of first-degree intentional homicide in the killing of his sister’s boyfriend. The man was bludgeoned to death with a sledgehammer.

Department of Corrections spokesman John Dipko said the department was pleased with the decision and will continue to enforce rules that are designed to maintain a safe environment.

Singer’s court-appointed attorney, W.C. Turner Herbert, also did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

Source (http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/WeirdNews/2010/01/25/12608986-ap.html)

darkblade
2010-01-25, 11:51 PM
Gangs formed around D&D playing. Thats a new one.

OverdrivePrime
2010-01-25, 11:59 PM
We're straight thuggin'. :smallcool:

On one had, I'm sad to see anyone denied the pleasures of roleplaying games. On the other, prison is supposed to be punishment for misdeeds against society. I'm upset that inmates get TV and gyms. D&D is way too good.

randman22222
2010-01-26, 12:02 AM
We're straight thuggin'. :smallcool:

On one had, I'm sad to see anyone denied the pleasures of roleplaying games. On the other, prison is supposed to be punishment for misdeeds against society. I'm upset that inmates get TV and gyms. D&D is way too good.

Punishment.

...

For a forensic science major who really believe in the work he'll be doing later, I have strange, perhaps, views of justice.

I don't believe jails function half as well as they should. I don't think their primary purpose should be punishment, but correction - healing. And they don't do much that.

...Hmm... Just a random thought I'd add.

*Prances off.*

toasty
2010-01-26, 12:06 AM
Gambling and gangs... lol. That's rather interesting.

Temotei
2010-01-26, 12:11 AM
Scott Bauer...he has a blog. In Minnesota. Completely unrelated to this one, but I know him. :smallbiggrin:

Roland St. Jude
2010-01-26, 12:15 AM
Sheriff of Moddingham: While interesting, the topics involved are plainly political (power of the government both making the rule and judicially improving it) and religious (though surprisingly few were explicitly raised in the suit itself, it inevitably enters discussions). Like the previous thread on this, I have to lock it.