pita
2010-12-02, 09:42 PM
I've recently been on a "read what's been recommended to you" binge, and I've found two book series with great manipulators. Now, for spoiler's sake, we're allowing spoilers in this thread for The First Law trilogy and the Prince of Nothing trilogy to go unmarked. Anything beyond that, such as The Judging Eye or Best Served Cold will have to remain ignored.
I did this match-up in my head, and, at first, Kellhus won easily, considering where he is at the end of Prince of Nothing. Where Bayaz has taken over a kingdom by building it from scratch, Kellhus has made himself a god and has fanatics following him. Magical abilities I would say they're equal. Kellhus has mastered all of the magic of his world, while Bayaz has a ton of terrifying demonic powers. I don't know which is stronger. Persuasively, Kellhus makes Bayaz look like an idiot. Bayaz had to convince someone who hated him to do his bidding by torturing him (Jezal), and another by showing how easily he could kill him (Glokta). He also lost the loyalty of someone who was asking no questions and didn't want to know more than he absolutely had to (Logen).
However, now I'm wondering, how would Bayaz fare against Kellhus, assuming what happened in PON didn't happen? If Kellhus were to find himself in Adua in the beginning of PON instead of where he was?
Bayaz has the advantage of being ridiculously established, having servants everywhere, including a ninja cannibal wizard shapeshifter. He's also powerful enough to make all of that pale, personally. However, he can't expend too much power, otherwise Khalul may find that opportunity and attack him.
Kellhus has nothing but himself, but himself is very powerful. Amazing swordsman, but also an amazing manipulator with no ego, pretensions, or morals. He can make a skeptic into a devoted follower overnight, and, in the book series, could only find two characters he couldn't turn into his devotees. One was completely insane and knew all of his tricks (Cnaiur), the other was schooled by the first and had many many many reasons to hate him (Conphas).
I want to know, if Kellhus wanted to take over Adua, could he do it? What are the opinions on the board?
I did this match-up in my head, and, at first, Kellhus won easily, considering where he is at the end of Prince of Nothing. Where Bayaz has taken over a kingdom by building it from scratch, Kellhus has made himself a god and has fanatics following him. Magical abilities I would say they're equal. Kellhus has mastered all of the magic of his world, while Bayaz has a ton of terrifying demonic powers. I don't know which is stronger. Persuasively, Kellhus makes Bayaz look like an idiot. Bayaz had to convince someone who hated him to do his bidding by torturing him (Jezal), and another by showing how easily he could kill him (Glokta). He also lost the loyalty of someone who was asking no questions and didn't want to know more than he absolutely had to (Logen).
However, now I'm wondering, how would Bayaz fare against Kellhus, assuming what happened in PON didn't happen? If Kellhus were to find himself in Adua in the beginning of PON instead of where he was?
Bayaz has the advantage of being ridiculously established, having servants everywhere, including a ninja cannibal wizard shapeshifter. He's also powerful enough to make all of that pale, personally. However, he can't expend too much power, otherwise Khalul may find that opportunity and attack him.
Kellhus has nothing but himself, but himself is very powerful. Amazing swordsman, but also an amazing manipulator with no ego, pretensions, or morals. He can make a skeptic into a devoted follower overnight, and, in the book series, could only find two characters he couldn't turn into his devotees. One was completely insane and knew all of his tricks (Cnaiur), the other was schooled by the first and had many many many reasons to hate him (Conphas).
I want to know, if Kellhus wanted to take over Adua, could he do it? What are the opinions on the board?