Carvel
2011-02-13, 10:20 PM
ok... new guy here. got a little situation here.
what I am about to ask is something that i think most of you will think it's stupid, as I thought before.
but that started a discussion in my game table that could go on for hours.
The penalties for two-weapon fighting with a light weapon in off-hand would stick for the second attacks or not?
*I can almost hear the "HUNH?!" faces across the forum*
elaborating:
the att bonus progression, until level 20 would be, with the improved and greater feats:
a) +18/+18/+13/+13/+8/+8/+3
or
b) +18/+18/+15/+15/+10/+10/+5
I know there are talents to maximize this(A LOT!!!!), but that is not the point here. it's just that I thought it was option a) for little less than 8 years now(started playing D&D when 3.5 came out) and now that I decide to give a try to it (I'm more the big two handed weapon wielder or spellcaster kinda guy), and the other players in the table went on saying I was wrong.
Dunno... though this way I get more att bonus, feels kinda wrong, I guess.
what I am about to ask is something that i think most of you will think it's stupid, as I thought before.
but that started a discussion in my game table that could go on for hours.
The penalties for two-weapon fighting with a light weapon in off-hand would stick for the second attacks or not?
*I can almost hear the "HUNH?!" faces across the forum*
elaborating:
the att bonus progression, until level 20 would be, with the improved and greater feats:
a) +18/+18/+13/+13/+8/+8/+3
or
b) +18/+18/+15/+15/+10/+10/+5
I know there are talents to maximize this(A LOT!!!!), but that is not the point here. it's just that I thought it was option a) for little less than 8 years now(started playing D&D when 3.5 came out) and now that I decide to give a try to it (I'm more the big two handed weapon wielder or spellcaster kinda guy), and the other players in the table went on saying I was wrong.
Dunno... though this way I get more att bonus, feels kinda wrong, I guess.