PDA

View Full Version : Wizard ACF from UA - Fighter Bonus Feats Question.



Xerit
2012-01-10, 04:35 PM
If I take this ACF, can I use to just trade scribe scroll and then go back to normal wizard feat progression after that or am I locked in from that point forward?

I've seen people reference using this to obtain Improved Initiative at level 1, and then reference getting a domain power in exhchange for level 5 wizard feats, and I'm curious if that works by RAW or if thats something they must have worked out with their DM privately.

Eldariel
2012-01-10, 04:40 PM
If I take this ACF, can I use to just trade scribe scroll and then go back to normal wizard feat progression after that or am I locked in from that point forward?

I've seen people reference using this to obtain Improved Initiative at level 1, and then reference getting a domain power in exhchange for level 5 wizard feats, and I'm curious if that works by RAW or if thats something they must have worked out with their DM privately.

Bonus feat is a bonus feat; since Domain Power (or my preferred Spontaneous Divination) merely replaces the level 5 bonus feat, it doesn't really make a whole lot of difference what bonus feat it is.

But if you use the variant, by default it should apply in every instance so unless you take a variant you'd have to take a Fighter bonus feat on 5 too. Unless you work that out with your DM.

Xerit
2012-01-10, 04:47 PM
Ah I see thats how they did it.

I must have mis-remembered what it said in complete champion and kept looking for what I was missing in the other books. Thankyou very much!

Xerit
2012-01-10, 04:59 PM
Are there any other decent ACFs trading Scribe Scroll for a Focused Specialist Conjurer Wizard besides the one for Enhanced Summoning?

Eldariel
2012-01-10, 05:00 PM
Are there any other decent ACFs trading Scribe Scroll for a Focused Specialist Conjurer Wizard besides the one for Enhanced Summoning?

No. Handy compendium (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19872054/Alternative_Class_Features_III) (though it's not 100% comprehensive).