willpell
2012-06-20, 09:59 AM
I don't get the deal with scrolls vs. wands in D&D. Scrolls are vastly more complicated mechanically; you have to meet their Ability requirement, they provoke AoOs, and if you screw up you risk mishaps. The only advantages I see are that they're cheap and not capped at level 4, and I see no particular reason why wands being capped at level 4 isn't a rule to break in every campaign, given that psionic dorjes prove that there's nothing inherently wrong about a level 5-9 magic effect being put on a stick that you can use 50 times. They probably assumed that for higher-level effects you'd always want a staff, but that wasn't a good assumption IMO. In any event, for spell levels 1-4 at the least, it seems as though you'd always rather pay 750*X for 50 of a spell, instead of paying the same price for 30 of that spell and having to jump through more hoops getting it off, unless the spell is so niche that you'll hardly ever want it, in which case why even bother getting the scroll? This may be a case where my lack of practical expertise is hurting me, but I really don't see why all the rigamarole of scrolls is necessary when they're inherently worse than a single-use spell trigger item would be, and there's no particularly strong reason why such items don't exist other than that the rules make no allowance for it.
Is this another of those grognard things where it just keeps being the way it's always been, or is there something about scrolls which I'm missing where the extra hoops you have to jump through are somehow necessary?
Is this another of those grognard things where it just keeps being the way it's always been, or is there something about scrolls which I'm missing where the extra hoops you have to jump through are somehow necessary?