j00callme
2012-09-11, 10:29 PM
Hi all, I was hoping one of you D&D gurus might be able to help me settle a dispute in our group. We had a situation were a pc was fighting some goblin dogs, I am the dm, and I had one of the dogs take a 5 foot step from one of the pc's threatened squares to another to move closer to a square that would put him in flanking position on the next round, I then made a melee attack on the pc, and I was told that while the 5 foot step did not provoke an AoO, the melee attack did. I made the argument that the dog's bite attack doesn't provoke an attack of opportunity either, they stated that since the taking an action after the 5 foot step, this causes the dog to lower his defenses and is subject to an AoO since the PhB states:
'Two kinds of actions can provoke attacks of opportunity: moving out of a threatened square AND performing an action within a threatened square.' and not using 'OR performing an action within a threatened square.'
So am I just reading the rules wrong or what?
'Two kinds of actions can provoke attacks of opportunity: moving out of a threatened square AND performing an action within a threatened square.' and not using 'OR performing an action within a threatened square.'
So am I just reading the rules wrong or what?