Fruchtkracher
2013-01-04, 07:10 PM
Hello Playgrounders.
While currently updating my Zen Archer Monk I came across the feat Reckless Aim (http://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/reckless-aim-combat), which seems quite risky to use, but that risk factor might be dependant on when you threaten.
However, when you roll a natural 1 on a ranged attack roll made with this bonus, you automatically hit a random adjacent creature that threatens your intended target.
More precisely I haven't found anything in the rules that says you need to be hostile to threaten. As in if my target is in melee and adjectant to both one of my allies and one of his, do I have an equal chance to hit either of them? Or do I automaticely hit my ally?
Either way, would you say this risk is worthwhile?
While currently updating my Zen Archer Monk I came across the feat Reckless Aim (http://www.d20pfsrd.com/feats/combat-feats/reckless-aim-combat), which seems quite risky to use, but that risk factor might be dependant on when you threaten.
However, when you roll a natural 1 on a ranged attack roll made with this bonus, you automatically hit a random adjacent creature that threatens your intended target.
More precisely I haven't found anything in the rules that says you need to be hostile to threaten. As in if my target is in melee and adjectant to both one of my allies and one of his, do I have an equal chance to hit either of them? Or do I automaticely hit my ally?
Either way, would you say this risk is worthwhile?