Gotterdammerung
2013-03-14, 02:48 PM
I have noticed very different wording in the feats that correspond to psionic focus. The wording has very direct implications. I will explain the direct implications. I was curious what the playground felt about the Rules As Intended on this subject.
Psionic focus feats have a couple of reoccurring phrases with very different meanings.
A). "To use this feat, you must expend your psionic focus..."
B). "When you expend your focus..."
C). "If you expend your focus when manifesting that power...."
My first question, and the rules are kind of unclear on this, do you think you can expend your psionic focus to fuel multiple feats with wording A).
If not, then why, what stops you from being able to do so. To use the feat, you must expend your focus, all relevant feats will ask, "Did you expend your focus?" The answer is "Yes, I expended my focus."
Observing B). and C)., the wording is slightly different and implies the feat is not actually fueled by the psionic focus itself. It only asks if you expended your focus, but makes no mention of the expenditure actually fueling the feats ability.
Do you think feats with the wording of B). and C). automatically activate when a psionic focus is expended to fuel a separate ability? Could you expend your psionic focus to auto succeed on a concentration check to cast a spell defensively and then automatically activate Visceral Surge and Midnight Augmentation?
If no, then why?
Visceral Surge is accessible "when you expend your psionic focus", which you did.
Midnight Augmentation is accessible "if you expend your focus when manifesting" a specific power, which you did.
P.S. I think that by RAW it is pretty clear because none of the grammar is exclusive. But I am more interested in peoples opinions on R.A.I.
In other words, how do you think the designers intended for it to work? Looking forward to a lively debate on the topic. Try to be civil about it. It is more a curiousity/grammar debate.
Psionic focus feats have a couple of reoccurring phrases with very different meanings.
A). "To use this feat, you must expend your psionic focus..."
B). "When you expend your focus..."
C). "If you expend your focus when manifesting that power...."
My first question, and the rules are kind of unclear on this, do you think you can expend your psionic focus to fuel multiple feats with wording A).
If not, then why, what stops you from being able to do so. To use the feat, you must expend your focus, all relevant feats will ask, "Did you expend your focus?" The answer is "Yes, I expended my focus."
Observing B). and C)., the wording is slightly different and implies the feat is not actually fueled by the psionic focus itself. It only asks if you expended your focus, but makes no mention of the expenditure actually fueling the feats ability.
Do you think feats with the wording of B). and C). automatically activate when a psionic focus is expended to fuel a separate ability? Could you expend your psionic focus to auto succeed on a concentration check to cast a spell defensively and then automatically activate Visceral Surge and Midnight Augmentation?
If no, then why?
Visceral Surge is accessible "when you expend your psionic focus", which you did.
Midnight Augmentation is accessible "if you expend your focus when manifesting" a specific power, which you did.
P.S. I think that by RAW it is pretty clear because none of the grammar is exclusive. But I am more interested in peoples opinions on R.A.I.
In other words, how do you think the designers intended for it to work? Looking forward to a lively debate on the topic. Try to be civil about it. It is more a curiousity/grammar debate.