Pathfinder Advanced Class Guide

[13ones]

So I just found out about this today...and I'm stoked! The slayer and the hunter sound the most interesting to me, but I'm honestly hoping for another spontanious caster..maybe a Warlock of sorts, combining the witch and the sorcerer?

Thoughts? Comments? Hopes and dreams? Lets hear them!

Here is a link for those unaware: http://paizo.com/paizo/blog/v5748dyo5lf8m?Advanced-Class-Guide

[Daftendirekt]

This could be interesting. I look forward to it all being posted on the PFSRD. (Books? Who buys books when it's all online?)

[Psyren]

Yeah, we were talking about it earlier. This (http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=301280) is the previous thread I think.

[navar100]

Paizo really, really, really hates multiclassing.

:smallsmile:

[HylianKnight]

Paizo really, really, really hates multiclassing.

:smallsmile:

One could argue that they're actually a fan. Seriously, in 3.5, how many viable multiclass options are there really? 3.5 ended up giving you a collection of one time feats just to make your cool cross concepts viable, "Paladin/Ranger - here's your feat, NEXT."

Pathfinder's like, "nah, man, that Druid/Ranger combination sounds awesome. Let's give you a whole new mechanic to tie it all together and let you start being cool from level 1."

They've said the Magus is the proof of concept class for all these, which I think is awesome. The Magus is a great GISH class, but also doesn't preclude me from making whatever Fighter/Wizard/EK builds I was already working with.

[Hiro Hackworth]

Wasn't multiclassing a bit encouraged in Tome of Battle within it's martial adept classes?

[MagnusExultatio]

I can't wait to see all the spellcasters and spellcaster options outshine the non-casters and non-caster options yet again.