Afgncaap5
2014-01-25, 05:22 PM
I'm working on a few challenges, one of which involves the players being shrunk down and fighting a large trunk (which to their new perspective would likely be about the size of an oblong barn.) I'm not sure exactly what CR I'm working with, though I'm guessing something around 12, if not lower. Do these modifications suggest CR 12-ish to you?
-I'm treating the material of the trunk as being "magically treated bronzewood" using the rules for magically treated walls in the DMG. This would give it a hardness of 16. The book doesn't suggest that stronger materials bump the CR, though I could see that being a reasonable assumption.
-It has a number of legs, so it's a fast creature and could take advantage of the Trample ability.
-A perfectly square trunk of this size doesn't seem... likely. I'm toying with the idea of giving it the dimensions of 20x40, which would make it larger than a gargantuan creature's suggested size, but smaller than a colossal creature's suggested size. Does that still seem big enough, or should I just go with the standard 30x30? (Part of me even wants to change the creature's AC based on which side of it the players are on, in a kind of "broad side of the barn" vs. "narrow side of the barn" sense, but that might be a bit much.)
-Being a trunk, it seems reasonable to also give it a Bite attack, possibly with Improved Grab and an option for a modified version of Swallow Whole. I might remove the Slam attack entirely in favor of this (the damage would be the same for a creature of that size, after all). Swallowed players wouldn't be subject to digestion, but would have to make either a Reflex or Tumble check every round to keep themselves from being jostled around by interior gears and sliding panels (and the basic movement of the creature) and taking minimal bludgeoning damage. However, if the box decides to stop fighting creatures outside itself (or if it manages to swallow everybody), it can take a full round action to violently shake itself and deal damage to everyone inside it as if on a Trample attack. Players would have more room to carve themselves out than with a regular Swallow Whole attack so could use things other than light weapons, but if they use non-magical or bludgeoning weapons they still have to deal with the hardness when cutting through the interior walls.
(As a side note: another DM and I could never quite figure out for ourselves if the damage dealt while escaping a creature should count against its hit-point total. It feels like it'd make more sense than usual with a construct, but I'm still not sure if the rules ever said one way or the other.)
Those abilities might be a stopping point. However, at the risk of overcomplicating the creature, I'm also considering putting seven gems that can all be activated at once, each launching a single maximized and empowered magic missile (each one dealing seven damage.) This probably isn't necessary, and might make it too clunky, but as seven has turned into something of an arc number it might be a fun one-time attack near the start of the fight.
So, with all that in mind, do you think I'm still somewhere in the CR 10-12 range, or will I need to bump its numbers a bit?
-I'm treating the material of the trunk as being "magically treated bronzewood" using the rules for magically treated walls in the DMG. This would give it a hardness of 16. The book doesn't suggest that stronger materials bump the CR, though I could see that being a reasonable assumption.
-It has a number of legs, so it's a fast creature and could take advantage of the Trample ability.
-A perfectly square trunk of this size doesn't seem... likely. I'm toying with the idea of giving it the dimensions of 20x40, which would make it larger than a gargantuan creature's suggested size, but smaller than a colossal creature's suggested size. Does that still seem big enough, or should I just go with the standard 30x30? (Part of me even wants to change the creature's AC based on which side of it the players are on, in a kind of "broad side of the barn" vs. "narrow side of the barn" sense, but that might be a bit much.)
-Being a trunk, it seems reasonable to also give it a Bite attack, possibly with Improved Grab and an option for a modified version of Swallow Whole. I might remove the Slam attack entirely in favor of this (the damage would be the same for a creature of that size, after all). Swallowed players wouldn't be subject to digestion, but would have to make either a Reflex or Tumble check every round to keep themselves from being jostled around by interior gears and sliding panels (and the basic movement of the creature) and taking minimal bludgeoning damage. However, if the box decides to stop fighting creatures outside itself (or if it manages to swallow everybody), it can take a full round action to violently shake itself and deal damage to everyone inside it as if on a Trample attack. Players would have more room to carve themselves out than with a regular Swallow Whole attack so could use things other than light weapons, but if they use non-magical or bludgeoning weapons they still have to deal with the hardness when cutting through the interior walls.
(As a side note: another DM and I could never quite figure out for ourselves if the damage dealt while escaping a creature should count against its hit-point total. It feels like it'd make more sense than usual with a construct, but I'm still not sure if the rules ever said one way or the other.)
Those abilities might be a stopping point. However, at the risk of overcomplicating the creature, I'm also considering putting seven gems that can all be activated at once, each launching a single maximized and empowered magic missile (each one dealing seven damage.) This probably isn't necessary, and might make it too clunky, but as seven has turned into something of an arc number it might be a fun one-time attack near the start of the fight.
So, with all that in mind, do you think I'm still somewhere in the CR 10-12 range, or will I need to bump its numbers a bit?