DireKit
2014-04-08, 06:16 AM
We recall having read a book a while ago that had some organization or group of people, maybe a sect or something that had a broader definition of what defined 'natural,' We specifically recall that things like Vampires and the like were considered not necessarily to be 'unnatural,' but were a part of nature and a part of a 'greater balance.'
They viewed the general idea of the mainstream definition of 'nature' as narrow-minded.
Does anyone have any clue what We're talking about? We've been scouring various sourcebooks on varied campaigns forever, this is driving us crazy.
We THINK it was D&D 3.x but We can't be certain.
They viewed the general idea of the mainstream definition of 'nature' as narrow-minded.
Does anyone have any clue what We're talking about? We've been scouring various sourcebooks on varied campaigns forever, this is driving us crazy.
We THINK it was D&D 3.x but We can't be certain.