Book 5 Duplicate Strip Name

[konradknox]

Strips #681 and #842 are both called "All in the Family".
Will one of the titles be changed? I think #842 should keep the name, it fits more powerfully, and #648 should be renamed, to keep unique naming thing.

//edit : thanks for correction

[RNGgod]

#681, actually, but I take your point.

[Emperordaniel]

Multiple strips having the same name is nothing new. Case in point:

OotS #333: The Bright Side (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0333.html)
OotS #877: The Bright Side (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0877.html)

I highly doubt this will be something that'll change in the future. :smallconfused:

[AstralFire]

Repeats when you decide to title every page of your comic are probably to be expected given the sheer quantity.

[lee7pwnage]

Multiple strips having the same name is nothing new. Case in point:

OotS #333: The Bright Side (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0333.html)
OotS #877: The Bright Side (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0877.html)

I highly doubt this will be something that'll change in the future. :smallconfused:

Given the events of those two strips and how they relate to each other, I think The Giant did that one on purpose.

[Grey Watcher]

Multiple strips having the same name is nothing new. Case in point:

OotS #333: The Bright Side (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0333.html)
OotS #877: The Bright Side (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0877.html)

I took that pair to be deliberate, given the content.

[Jaxzan Proditor]

I feel like this has been brought up before, although I don't remember when. :smallconfused:

In any case, I doubt it will be changed since, intentionally or not, comics have been named after each other before. I don't think the names are all that important, to be honest.

[Rogar Demonblud]

Since the strips are identified by number rather than name, duplicate naming is mostly irrelevant anyway. Like having two cousins named Rachel.