KillianHawkeye
2014-04-27, 12:04 PM
It's a common scenario, especially in action movies. The hero and the villain have their final showdown. They start fighting. The villain gains the upper hand and proceeds to taunt the hero about what they're going to do to the hero's friends or loved ones once they're done beating the hero. The hero summons his last reserves of strength, which is always just enough to let them finally beat the villain.
Now, I understand that this happens in order to create additional tension in the scene. That the movie needs to show that the villain is capable of beating the hero in order to give the threat he represents credibility. Most of the time, we don't want to see a movie where the hero effortlessly defeats every bad guy they come up against, because it's unfulfilling (except the '80s Schwarzenegger flick Commando; that movie kicks all kinds of ass).
Anyway, I understand why stories are written this way (and it may even be realistic), but a part of me still thinks that a true hero should already be trying their hardest without the villians making it personal. Most things are not Dragonball Z, where the heroes ACTUALLY become stronger, faster, and more ruthless when the villains piss them off. When the movie reaches its climax, everybody watching knows that the hero possesses the strength or skill (or knowledge, or whatever) needed to beat the villain, so why is it so often necessary to goad the hero into unleashing their full strength that they need in order to win? Perhaps it's Hollywood's obsession with flawed heroes, but shouldn't a true hero care as much about the common man as they do about their own?
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss.
Now, I understand that this happens in order to create additional tension in the scene. That the movie needs to show that the villain is capable of beating the hero in order to give the threat he represents credibility. Most of the time, we don't want to see a movie where the hero effortlessly defeats every bad guy they come up against, because it's unfulfilling (except the '80s Schwarzenegger flick Commando; that movie kicks all kinds of ass).
Anyway, I understand why stories are written this way (and it may even be realistic), but a part of me still thinks that a true hero should already be trying their hardest without the villians making it personal. Most things are not Dragonball Z, where the heroes ACTUALLY become stronger, faster, and more ruthless when the villains piss them off. When the movie reaches its climax, everybody watching knows that the hero possesses the strength or skill (or knowledge, or whatever) needed to beat the villain, so why is it so often necessary to goad the hero into unleashing their full strength that they need in order to win? Perhaps it's Hollywood's obsession with flawed heroes, but shouldn't a true hero care as much about the common man as they do about their own?
Thoughts? Comments? Discuss.