DawnQuixotic
2014-07-26, 05:41 AM
Okay, first of all, massive apologies for coming out of the blue to ask a question, since I haven't really hung around D&D boards much, especially not lately, but I figured this was a good place to get feedback on what I want to ask.
Anyway, to the point. I'm joining a 3.5 game soon which has prompted me to go lurking about old threads looking for character concepts. One topic I saw rehashed in a lot of short treads was in regards to Vow of Poverty, is it good/bad etc. Consensus is bad, but it seemed to me it's a concept a lot of people are attracted to... trading gear for more abilities.
The recurring problems were these:
1) Abilities you get don't make up for magic items
2) You can't even borrow stuff, which draws logical criticisms of the concept
3) not really a problem that comes up in discussion, but you have to be an exalted good character, which does mesh with the character idea I have for this game I'm getting into (which is an evil-ish druid)
So the feat itself isn't what I want, but some of the concepts behind it interest me. Especially with the druid angle.
So my question is this.
If the abilities you get from the feat aren't equivalent to the wealth you're giving up... how would you use that wealth to emulate the abilities and play a character that minimizes their worldly possessions (keeping the concept but not being bound by the text of that rule).
How would a character spend their Wealth By Level and invest subsequent loot on things that aren't "gear" or "equipment" in a conventional sense.
It's not an actual vow of poverty, so, something like a tricked out wooden staff would be a given. The idea is simply to minimize the amount of stuff you're carrying around (and since I'm looking at a druid, making what stuff she does carry around be mostly naturalistic in flavor).
I know grafts would be a place to start, maybe something like a permanent magic tattoo, and if I recall there's some like... magical locations that give you a bonus that have a gp cost attached so you can spend your WBL on them.
It doesn't have to be super-optimized, just something that would work.
That was kinda long and repetitive. Hopefully it made sense.
Thank you so much for any ideas you have to offer.
Anyway, to the point. I'm joining a 3.5 game soon which has prompted me to go lurking about old threads looking for character concepts. One topic I saw rehashed in a lot of short treads was in regards to Vow of Poverty, is it good/bad etc. Consensus is bad, but it seemed to me it's a concept a lot of people are attracted to... trading gear for more abilities.
The recurring problems were these:
1) Abilities you get don't make up for magic items
2) You can't even borrow stuff, which draws logical criticisms of the concept
3) not really a problem that comes up in discussion, but you have to be an exalted good character, which does mesh with the character idea I have for this game I'm getting into (which is an evil-ish druid)
So the feat itself isn't what I want, but some of the concepts behind it interest me. Especially with the druid angle.
So my question is this.
If the abilities you get from the feat aren't equivalent to the wealth you're giving up... how would you use that wealth to emulate the abilities and play a character that minimizes their worldly possessions (keeping the concept but not being bound by the text of that rule).
How would a character spend their Wealth By Level and invest subsequent loot on things that aren't "gear" or "equipment" in a conventional sense.
It's not an actual vow of poverty, so, something like a tricked out wooden staff would be a given. The idea is simply to minimize the amount of stuff you're carrying around (and since I'm looking at a druid, making what stuff she does carry around be mostly naturalistic in flavor).
I know grafts would be a place to start, maybe something like a permanent magic tattoo, and if I recall there's some like... magical locations that give you a bonus that have a gp cost attached so you can spend your WBL on them.
It doesn't have to be super-optimized, just something that would work.
That was kinda long and repetitive. Hopefully it made sense.
Thank you so much for any ideas you have to offer.