Belkarseviltwin
2014-09-07, 06:40 AM
My character for an upcoming campaign is an Archivist focused on Summoning and going into Malconvoker. So two of my feats are spoken for already (the Malconvoker prereqs of Spell Focus (Conjuration) and Augment Summoning).
The question is, is the loss of one caster level at the first level of Malconvoker sufficient to justify burning a feat to partially fix it with Practised Spellcaster? This would be taken as my 6th level feat, so as I enter Malconvoker.
If so, I would have to choose between which of Draconic Archivist and Spontaneous Summoner went in my human bonus slot, or take a Flaw (DM is allowing these) to get both.
If not, I'd probably take Spontaneous Summoner as my bonus feat, and Draconic Archivist at 6th.
Unless there's another very useful feat that's glaringly missing? Note that my DM is not allowing Academic Priest.
The question is, is the loss of one caster level at the first level of Malconvoker sufficient to justify burning a feat to partially fix it with Practised Spellcaster? This would be taken as my 6th level feat, so as I enter Malconvoker.
If so, I would have to choose between which of Draconic Archivist and Spontaneous Summoner went in my human bonus slot, or take a Flaw (DM is allowing these) to get both.
If not, I'd probably take Spontaneous Summoner as my bonus feat, and Draconic Archivist at 6th.
Unless there's another very useful feat that's glaringly missing? Note that my DM is not allowing Academic Priest.