Sin Dragons

[DoctorJello]

Does anyone remember what book the Sin Dragons were in (Gluttony, Envy, etc.)

I remember it was a third party 3.0 or 3.5 book, but I don't remember the name.

[atemu1234]

I have no clue, but I'm guessing Draconic Lore. Not too many 3rd party books made dragons of new varieties.

[FocusWolf413]

Is it bad that I've been doing so much calculus over the past few days that I thought it said sin(dragons)?

[atemu1234]

Is it bad that I've been doing so much calculus over the past few days that I thought it said sin(dragons)?

A little bit. You might want to take a break, maybe go see Age of Ultron or something.

[Buufreak]

Is it bad that I've been doing so much calculus over the past few days that I thought it said sin(dragons)?

Tan(dragons) - 1?

[Seclora]

My bet would be one of the magazines, or a web enhancement.
Curiosity's sake, why do you want them? My impression has always been that dragons had a very Captain Mal sort of attitude towards the seven deadly sins.

[danzibr]

Is it bad that I've been doing so much calculus over the past few days that I thought it said sin(dragons)?
No no, +/-(1-cos^2(dragons))^.5

[Ruethgar]

Classic Play The Book of Dragons Mongoose Publishing page 158+ has Sin Dragons. Never, ever, EVER, EVER allow that book to be used by players with Races of the Dragon. The Kobold would become even more powerful than all other races.

[FocusWolf413]

No no, +/-(1-cos^2(dragons))^.5

No no, ∫sin(dragons)d(dragons)=-cos(dragons)+crusader.

[atemu1234]

Classic Play The Book of Dragons Mongoose Publishing page 158+ has Sin Dragons. Never, ever, EVER, EVER allow that book to be used by players with Races of the Dragon. The Kobold would become even more powerful than all other races.

Unless you disallow dwk cheese?

[Ruethgar]

Unless you disallow dwk cheese?

It rarely if at all specifies true dragon so even without that cheese you still qualify for a vast majority of the book with the dragon type, some of it is even automatic and not taken as an option like Loredrake or Spellhoarding.

[danzibr]

No no, ∫sin(dragons)d(dragons)=-cos(dragons)+crusader.
No no, Σ_{n=0}^∞(-1)^n(dragons)^{2n+1}/(2n+1)! btw, I like yours :)

[Lord of Shadows]

LOL

Hey, wait a minute, if there were Sin Dragons, was there an opposite group of Saintly Dragons? Everything seems to need an opposite...
.

[FocusWolf413]

No no, Σ_{n=0}^∞(-1)^n(dragons)^{2n+1}/(2n+1)! btw, I like yours :)

F_Dragons=(ρuuAC_Dragons)/2

Your's are pretty great too :).

[CIDE]

No other place can jokes be made about both Dragons and Math while still carrying on the conversation at hand.

That said I've never heard of these dragons. I am interested to hear the answer though.

[goto124]

So that's where the Half-dragons came from...

[danzibr]

F_Dragons=(ρuuAC_Dragons)/2

Your's are pretty great too :).
(e^{idragons}-e^{-idragons})/(2i) That last one went somewhere I don't know. The F makes me think Fourier transform, but... after some googling, it seems not. I went the Metric Geometry route.

[Killer Angel]

Dragon of Gluttony. (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0719.html)

[FocusWolf413]

(e^{idragons}-e^{-idragons})/(2i) That last one went somewhere I don't know. The F makes me think Fourier transform, but... after some googling, it seems not. I went the Metric Geometry route.

W=FDragoncos(thayan)
It was the Drag(on) force equation. And this current one was bleh. I'm in a bit of a rush.

[danzibr]

W=FDragoncos(thayan)
It was the Drag(on) force equation. And this current one was bleh. I'm in a bit of a rush.
ℱ_x[i(π/2)^.5(δ(x+1)-δ(x-1))](Dragons)Ah-ha! Now I see it (after my friend google helped me out). And... this is probably the best I can do, advanced-math wise.

[Lord of Shadows]

Great Googly Moogly...

I haven't seen this much math since my College years. :cool: