BardicDuelist
2007-04-22, 02:58 PM
I am not saying that fighters are not useful. The fact that my group tends to play games Lv. 1-13 means that I could never consider them so. My idea is to try and make them more useful, especially as you advance in levels.
In my group ToB classes are banned. That isn't changing. The main reason is because we do not want more mechanics. I did manage, however, to convince my DM that allowing Martial Study, Martial Stance, and Sudden Recovery would be a happy middle ground.
Because the classes are banned, I was wondering if treating non-adept level as full, instead of 1/2 for the purposes of qualifying for maneuvers would be a bad idea. Would it be better (and perhaps make fighters more attractive) to treat only fighter levels as full and other classes as 1/2?
What about using BAB as a prereq. instead of adept level?
In my group ToB classes are banned. That isn't changing. The main reason is because we do not want more mechanics. I did manage, however, to convince my DM that allowing Martial Study, Martial Stance, and Sudden Recovery would be a happy middle ground.
Because the classes are banned, I was wondering if treating non-adept level as full, instead of 1/2 for the purposes of qualifying for maneuvers would be a bad idea. Would it be better (and perhaps make fighters more attractive) to treat only fighter levels as full and other classes as 1/2?
What about using BAB as a prereq. instead of adept level?