PDA

View Full Version : what happened to belkar amulet?



de-trick
2007-05-12, 05:54 PM
alfer belklar killed the goblin cleric #11 order of the stick belkar say "dibs on amulet" what ever appened to it

Shadic
2007-05-12, 05:57 PM
Pretty sure it was just part of the joke, and the party (Mostly) splits everything that they find.

If it wasn't anything super-special, it was probably just sold off, and I doubt its importance.

de-trick
2007-05-12, 09:53 PM
i wonder if it was the amulet roy used to hang xykons crown

Actis
2007-05-12, 10:21 PM
If I've undersood right, that was the ring of jumping +20 (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0130.html), which Belkar uses to scape his cell after hiding it inside his rectum.

As seen there the party split the magic items they had previously found, after Vaarsuvius finished identifying them. While it's possible the specific amulet from #11 was the ring of jumping I consider it very unlikely.

de-trick
2007-05-13, 01:35 AM
no i was talking about the amulet belkar took off the dead goblin cleric and if it was the same amulet roy used to wear xykons crown

Netherwood
2007-05-13, 01:59 AM
#11 (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0011.html) I'm with Shadic.... I assume the amulet was either non-magical or weaker than what they already had and just sold it.

#116 (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0116.html) Panel 6... it doesn't look like Roy attaches the crown to any amulet, just a rope/chain/whatever. So no, I don't think Roy used that amulet to hold Xykon's crown.

Shades of Gray
2007-05-13, 09:15 AM
maybe it was the amulet of natural protection that sent Durkon's AC int'a tha stratosphere!

Threeshades
2007-05-13, 11:43 AM
the goblin cleric's amulet is his holy symbol. Every cleric in oots is wearing an amulet and for redcloak and durkon it was already mentioned that those are their holy symbols.

And as such none of the Order's members had any use for it, since none of them are Clerics of the Goblin God

bobmonkeyq
2007-05-13, 11:50 AM
huh. Just noticed this when someone mentioned Roy putting on the crown. I went to see if there were any graphic upgrades to the string he put it on, and I noticed in comic 441 Xykon and Roy both have the crown in the first pannel. Sorry if this is old.

BardicLasher
2007-05-13, 04:09 PM
huh. Just noticed this when someone mentioned Roy putting on the crown. I went to see if there were any graphic upgrades to the string he put it on, and I noticed in comic 441 Xykon and Roy both have the crown in the first pannel. Sorry if this is old.


I hadn't noticed that before! That's pretty funny! XD

But yeah, my vote is that it's the Amulet of Natural Armor that Durkon took.

Bucephalus
2007-05-13, 04:32 PM
wow, xykon and roy do both have the crown in that panel

David Argall
2007-05-13, 06:38 PM
A possible error, but our lich probably has several spare crowns and so the fact they look the same is merely the matter of limited different ways to draw a crown.

bobmonkeyq
2007-05-13, 08:10 PM
A possible error, but our lich probably has several spare crowns and so the fact they look the same is merely the matter of limited different ways to draw a crown.


But he had already taken the crown from Roy at that point. Plus he doesn't have it in previous comics like this (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0369.html)

Faramir
2007-05-14, 07:00 PM
Yes, the amulet of natural armor had always been my assumption too.