PDA

View Full Version : Belkar's Question! *spoilers*



flying_monkey
2007-05-28, 12:56 AM
I was just reading over the comics when and I reread http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0331.html when I relized that Belkar's answer came true! He caused Roy's death by giving him the Ring of Jumping, which let him jump up to the zombie dragon!

Woof
2007-05-28, 01:22 AM
It's been posted and discussed several times already.

Like here:

http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45256&highlight=belkar
http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44228&highlight=belkar
http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42693&highlight=belkar

... and all the other posts linked in those thread.
Using the search button is a good idea :smallsigh:

JaxGaret
2007-05-28, 02:13 AM
Can we please sticky this or something?

Jeez.

factotum
2007-05-28, 02:20 AM
Not again... :smallfurious:

Rincewind
2007-05-28, 02:47 AM
I was just reading over the comics when and I reread http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0331.html when I relized that Belkar's answer came true! He caused Roy's death by giving him the Ring of Jumping, which let him jump up to the zombie dragon!

O RLY?

:sigh:

Glome
2007-05-28, 02:52 AM
Also, Redcloak is going to betray Xykon, the MITD is really the snarl, Belkar is really not chaotic evil, and Vaarsuvius is really (fe)male and I have proof. Did I miss any?

Woof
2007-05-28, 03:01 AM
Also, Redcloak is going to betray Xykon, the MITD is really the snarl, Belkar is really not chaotic evil, and Vaarsuvius is really (fe)male and I have proof. Did I miss any?

Haley is not really human :smalltongue:

Seriously though it would be great if we could add some of these to the FAQ. Could we have a mod here please?

jindra34
2007-05-28, 07:28 AM
Not again... :smallfurious:

my sentiments exactly...:mad:

Emperor Ing
2007-05-28, 07:53 AM
Also, Redcloak is going to betray Xykon, the MITD is really the snarl, Belkar is really not chaotic evil, and Vaarsuvius is really (fe)male and I have proof. Did I miss any?

1) Unlikely...
2) My friend is right! it all makes sense!
3) NOT TRUE!!! ONE: (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0011.html) TWO: (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0230.html)
4) i agree, but whats ur proof? :smallconfused:

jindra34
2007-05-28, 08:06 AM
1) Unlikely...
2) My friend is right! it all makes sense!
3) NOT TRUE!!! ONE: (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0011.html) TWO: (http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0230.html)
4) i agree, but whats ur proof? :smallconfused:

You missed the point by a parsec.

Setra
2007-05-28, 08:19 AM
It could just be a troll topic.

Also, it's possible... but I could care less whether or not it's true.

Ladorak
2007-05-28, 09:55 AM
Also, Redcloak is going to betray Xykon, the MITD is really the snarl, Belkar is really not chaotic evil, and Vaarsuvius is really (fe)male and I have proof. Did I miss any?

Surely there should be something in there about Miko, she's always a hot topic.

evileeyore
2007-05-28, 10:11 AM
O RLY?

:sigh:

http://www.geocities.com/evileeyore/orly_cthulu.jpg

It's astounding, time is fleeting
Madness takes its toll
But listen closely, not for very much longer
I've got to keep control...

Norenche
2007-05-28, 10:25 AM
Surely there should be something in there about Miko, she's always a hot topic.

Miko will become Blackguard
Thog will join the OotS

I think that there's no more hot topics

Icewalker
2007-05-28, 01:01 PM
............:smallannoyed:

I like the idea of adding "stop making posts about this, this, this, this, this, or this, to the FAQ. But not too many read it, and that isn't the kind of thing you would check for.

Stickied "current theories you shouldn't repost" thread? I dunno.

Spiryt
2007-05-28, 01:40 PM
I'm not sure...
You know what will we grumble about, if those threads will be no more :smallbiggrin: ?

Rhyeira
2007-05-28, 01:50 PM
Seriously, though... some people's tendency to start new topics about things that have been discussed a hundred times before *is* beginning to get annoying. :smallannoyed:

TigerHunter
2007-05-28, 03:13 PM
Seriously, though... some people's tendency to start new topics about things that have been discussed a hundred times before *is* beginning to get annoying. :smallannoyed:
So why don't we just let the first poster inform them that it's already a common theory (preferably in a non-insulting manner) and then let the thread die. For God's sake, people, leave the poor guy alone.

Darkbane
2007-05-28, 03:33 PM
Has anybody noticed that the person who started this thread hasn't actually continued posting? Just stop and let the thread die; vengeance has been wrought already.

truemane
2007-05-28, 03:37 PM
Actually, this thread has had FAR too many sane and calm responses and not NEARLY enough frantic leet-filled name calling for vengeance to be truly complete.

But in the interests of brevity, I'll let it go.