barto48
2015-12-02, 05:13 PM
Hello
In the beginning I want to apologise for any mistakes, I just creat an account here and English is not my native language.
My character in 4th ed. is ranger, elf. I use Archer build and Beast Mastery as fighting style. I've heard many stories about rangers dealing vast amount of damage. But it turned out, that reality is diffrent from legends: our fighter very often deals more damage than I do. Build details:
Ranger Elf, level 4 (5 to-be)
Build: Archer
Fighting style: beast mastery
Skills: Nature, Perception, Stealth, Acrobatics and Endurance
Feats: Improved initiative, Elven precision, Lethal hunter
Ranger at-will 1: Twin strike
Ranger at-will 1: Nimble strike
Encounter 1: Hindering shot
Daily 1: Sure shot
Utility 2: Begin the hunt
Encounter 3: Cut and run
hp: 39
Speed: 7
init: +11
Str: 15, con: 12, dex: 20, int: 12, wis: 16, cha: 10;
Favourite weapon: longbow (but I think about taking feat that allows me to use greatbow)
Companion: wolf
Is there any possibility to increase damage dealt by us (me and wolf), or there is not much more that I can do?
Bonus question: I've heard, that Archer being superior over Beast Masters (talking about fighting style), but I don't see much diffrence in powers and feats (excluding Prime Shot and Running Attack). By far I find it more usefull to be BM than Archer: companion provides CA, it is 'a little tank' - can take some dmg (yet he is rarely attacked for he don't attack much), sometimes it deals OA, works as a plug in narrow corridors, helps me in scout tasks, increases bonus from defensive from +2 to +3... I can't see why Archer can be better than BM, who uses bow and an arrows to deal damage and companion as a 'helper'. I don't know if I am right or I missed something. Write what You think about it too.
In the beginning I want to apologise for any mistakes, I just creat an account here and English is not my native language.
My character in 4th ed. is ranger, elf. I use Archer build and Beast Mastery as fighting style. I've heard many stories about rangers dealing vast amount of damage. But it turned out, that reality is diffrent from legends: our fighter very often deals more damage than I do. Build details:
Ranger Elf, level 4 (5 to-be)
Build: Archer
Fighting style: beast mastery
Skills: Nature, Perception, Stealth, Acrobatics and Endurance
Feats: Improved initiative, Elven precision, Lethal hunter
Ranger at-will 1: Twin strike
Ranger at-will 1: Nimble strike
Encounter 1: Hindering shot
Daily 1: Sure shot
Utility 2: Begin the hunt
Encounter 3: Cut and run
hp: 39
Speed: 7
init: +11
Str: 15, con: 12, dex: 20, int: 12, wis: 16, cha: 10;
Favourite weapon: longbow (but I think about taking feat that allows me to use greatbow)
Companion: wolf
Is there any possibility to increase damage dealt by us (me and wolf), or there is not much more that I can do?
Bonus question: I've heard, that Archer being superior over Beast Masters (talking about fighting style), but I don't see much diffrence in powers and feats (excluding Prime Shot and Running Attack). By far I find it more usefull to be BM than Archer: companion provides CA, it is 'a little tank' - can take some dmg (yet he is rarely attacked for he don't attack much), sometimes it deals OA, works as a plug in narrow corridors, helps me in scout tasks, increases bonus from defensive from +2 to +3... I can't see why Archer can be better than BM, who uses bow and an arrows to deal damage and companion as a 'helper'. I don't know if I am right or I missed something. Write what You think about it too.