Dragon+ Mag: Any Decent Content in It?

[Toaau]

A brief scan of the issues only revealed alternate spell components, Elemental Trinkets, and some stats for Belaphoss. I'm not asking for much-the alternate spell components weren't much, but they could've been part of a sourcebook or UA as fluff. What I'm asking is, is there anything else, anything at all, that is actual content in it (apart from plugs for UA, Plane Shift and the like)?

[Toaau]

Anyone? Anything?

[khadgar567]

okay new product but first nani?

[j_spencer93]

Never knew they did stats in it. Interesting. Nice to have that Balor's stats though.

[Toaau]

okay new product but first nani?

Can you explain what you mean by this?

[Toaau]

Never knew they did stats in it. Interesting. Nice to have that Balor's stats though.

Yeah, finding out about that was what drew me to the mag.

[j_spencer93]

any other stats? I honestly have avoided it because it was boring for the issues i have read.

[Toaau]

any other stats? I honestly have avoided it because it was boring for the issues i have read.

It is for the most part, and I suspect the lack of replies stems from the fact that noone is really a big supporter of it.:smallcool:

[j_spencer93]

Hate to say it, I liked to old 3.5 version. I like the more fluff this time, but sprinkle it was new material. Or else it is just boring.

[Finback]

Hell, I enjoyed the 4e version. I really don't see much appeal in a lot of the tangential stuff which is interviews with people (which are on their podcasts anyway), articles about things they often are putting into their books, or simply promotional material for the Next Thing (which I understand, but when there's no line between an actual article, and what's basically an advertisement, it grates).

And I guess we won't see a Dungeon magazine anymore, since they can use the dmsguild site to either put out (and charge for) new material, or rely upon the fanbase to do the work for them.