PDA

View Full Version : Unearthed Arcana 12/11/2017



Rogerdodger557
2017-12-11, 10:38 AM
It's the second Monday of the month. Let the speculation begin.

Edit: There will be no UA this month. Link to why below.

Malaketh
2017-12-11, 10:42 AM
SANTA CLAWS!!!!! a new cantrip....maybe it could be a Bard subclass? 🤔

Naanomi
2017-12-11, 10:44 AM
Sadly, the gnomes made a strong case for time off this month. There will be no Unearthed Arcana or Sage Advice articles published this December. We'll be back with full #DnD technomancer support in January! @mikemearls @JeremyECrawford

DivisibleByZero
2017-12-11, 10:44 AM
Speculation over.
No UA this month.

edit: ninja'd

Regitnui
2017-12-11, 11:53 AM
Why is there no UA? WotC going on holiday?

DivisibleByZero
2017-12-11, 11:55 AM
Why is there no UA? WotC going on holiday?

Santa stole all of the elves gnomes to do his grunt work.

Crusher
2017-12-11, 12:06 PM
SANTA CLAWS!!!!! a new cantrip....maybe it could be a Bard subclass? 🤔

I'm going to be playing just such a character in my next campaign. Sandy Claws, a rogue/warlock from a tribe of vicious desert gnomes who ride deer or moose-pulled chariots into battle. They wear coats made from the fur of the beasts they've slain, and coat it in the blood of their enemies (so its bright red). Any part of the coat not covered in blood (such as the lining at the wrists, and hats), along with their long beards, tend to get bleached white by the sun. He looks down on elves as good for only menial labor, as his people subjugated a local tribe of elves, forcing them to make knick-knacks and trinkets.

He's an adventurer because he was tasked with guarding the children of the tribe, and failed in some horrible, unspecified way and he's trying to redeem himself. So he's kinda scary, but he loves children, enjoys giving them gifts (which he does secretly so as not to scare them), and would die to save virtually any child.

jaappleton
2017-12-11, 12:11 PM
September: "We've moved UA to the 2nd Monday of the month because it fits better into our schedules."

December: "No UA this month, we couldn't fit it into our schedules."

Mith
2017-12-11, 12:11 PM
I'm going to be playing just such a character in my next campaign. Sandy Claws, a rogue/warlock from a tribe of vicious desert gnomes who ride deer or moose-pulled chariots into battle. They wear coats made from the fur of the beasts they've slain, and coat it in the blood of their enemies (so its bright red). Any part of the coat not covered in blood (such as the lining at the wrists, and hats), along with their long beards, tend to get bleached white by the sun. He looks down on elves as good for only menial labor, as his people subjugated a local tribe of elves, forcing them to make knick-knacks and trinkets.

He's an adventurer because he was tasked with guarding the children of the tribe, and failed in some horrible, unspecified way and he's trying to redeem himself. So he's kinda scary, but he loves children, enjoys giving them gifts (which he does secretly so as not to scare them), and would die to save virtually any child.

This works perfectly for your current sig.

Dudewithknives
2017-12-11, 12:45 PM
September: "We've moved UA to the 2nd Monday of the month because it fits better into our schedules."

December: "No UA this month, we couldn't fit it into our schedules."

Just face it, UA has not mattered to the people at WOTC much since they had the last round of reworked subclasses with Ancients Barbarian and such in it.

Almost all of them since then have been like 1 page or 2 page things they threw together in once afternoon.

jaappleton
2017-12-11, 12:47 PM
Just face it, UA has not mattered to the people at WOTC much since they had the last round of reworked subclasses with Ancients Barbarian and such in it.

There's been tons of times where it's seemed like an afterthought.

And plenty of times when they've dropped something substantial, like Aritificer, Mystic, etc.

Yet there's been times where it has felt like a kick to the groin, like Mass Combat and Greyhawk Initiative.

Temperjoke
2017-12-11, 12:49 PM
Holidays are busy for everyone. It's not like I was hoping for something Holiday-themed or anything. *sniffs sadly*

Dudewithknives
2017-12-11, 12:51 PM
Holidays are busy for everyone. It's not like I was hoping for something Holiday-themed or anything. *sniffs sadly*

I was at least expecting a one page side item.

List of new weapons, new armors, new tools, or something.

I guess I should just give up on new weapons and armor, no love for martials out there.

I want my revamped Weapon Feats.

jaappleton
2017-12-11, 12:54 PM
Holidays are busy for everyone. It's not like I was hoping for something Holiday-themed or anything. *sniffs sadly*

That's really zero excuse.

They know the schedule. It's once a month.

What, am I not going to do payroll this week because the holidays are keeping me busy?

Dudewithknives
2017-12-11, 12:56 PM
That's really zero excuse.

They know the schedule. It's once a month.

What, am I not going to do payroll this week because the holidays are keeping me busy?

More Importantly it would make more sense for them to not have it in January if it was a holiday thing.

That is unless they just throw these things together without any actual in-house play testing beforehand...

Temperjoke
2017-12-11, 01:13 PM
That's really zero excuse.

They know the schedule. It's once a month.

What, am I not going to do payroll this week because the holidays are keeping me busy?

Well, when I said "holidays are busy for everyone" that actually also includes business activities, since year-end stuff can tie up scarce resources like time. Especially since a number of people take time off during the holidays when possible. While Crawford and Mearls may not have to do payroll, they probably have to finish up a number of things, like employee reviews for example, before people start disappearing.

If I had to guess, the next UA might be another class revisit of other UA classes that didn't make it into XGtE, which means it'll be a big one, so it might be taking more time to prep.

Auramis
2017-12-11, 01:57 PM
Well, when I said "holidays are busy for everyone" that actually also includes business activities, since year-end stuff can tie up scarce resources like time. Especially since a number of people take time off during the holidays when possible. While Crawford and Mearls may not have to do payroll, they probably have to finish up a number of things, like employee reviews for example, before people start disappearing.

If I had to guess, the next UA might be another class revisit of other UA classes that didn't make it into XGtE, which means it'll be a big one, so it might be taking more time to prep.

This is what I'm thinking. It helps I've been browsing the DM's guild and started writing my own things too. I feel less reliant on UA. It's fun to see when they come out, and I do love them, but I'm not upset when it doesn't roll around.

Besides, it's the holidays. People are busy. Hanukkah starts tomorrow and goes on until the 20th, then Christmas comes a few days after, then Kwanza after that, and New Year's after that. Even without the religious aspects, people love taking time to spend with their friends and families to cap off the end of the year, not to mention how busy the end of the year is for any workplace. I refuse to be upset over something like this. They've given us plenty of UAs and Xanthar's this year. That's pretty awesome.

Tectorman
2017-12-11, 03:51 PM
Sadly, the gnomes made a strong case for time off this month. There will be no Unearthed Arcana or Sage Advice articles published this December. We'll be back with full #DnD technomancer support in January! @mikemearls @JeremyECrawford

??? "Technomancer"? Is this supposed to be the next take on the Artificer class? Why change the name?

Vaz
2017-12-11, 04:00 PM
September: "We've moved UA to the 2nd Monday of the month because it fits better into our schedules."

December: "No UA this month, we couldn't fit it into our schedules."

'I came up with these totally awesome (read pointless bumrag) rules while playing dnd, not really paying attention, and then had it edited into a book and we actually made money off that nonsense' was part of the sales pitch for Xanathars.

Don't expect better from them simply because most of us can come up with a better subclass concept while doing the school run/driving to work/walking to class/having a morning glory ****.

Naanomi
2017-12-11, 04:00 PM
??? "Technomancer"? Is this supposed to be the next take on the Artificer class? Why change the name?
From the tweet “Oh, sorry to confuse, technomancer was just a random joke. It's got nothing to do with what's coming next.”

Finlam
2017-12-11, 04:04 PM
From the tweet “Oh, sorry to confuse, technomancer was just a random joke. It's got nothing to do with what's coming next.”

Up next: Mike Mearl's introduces his cooking and eating variant.

Have you ever wondered: how bad does this ration taste to my character? Or will eating human-meat give my character a disease and what's the DC for that? With this new Unearthed Arcana you can get the answers to all these questions. I tested it with my group and it went over really well. Todd had to roll a new Barbarian!

Theodoxus
2017-12-11, 04:14 PM
'I came up with these totally awesome (read pointless bumrag) rules while playing dnd, not really paying attention, and then had it edited into a book and we actually made money off that nonsense' was part of the sales pitch for Xanathars.

Don't expect better from them simply because most of us can come up with a better subclass concept while doing the school run/driving to work/walking to class/having a morning glory ****.

Don't forget the 10 or so filler content of "names easily generated on the internet". I mean thanks, that's what, $2 of the $50 retail price I could generate myself? /facepalm

Dragolord
2017-12-11, 06:24 PM
There's been tons of times where it's seemed like an afterthought.

And plenty of times when they've dropped something substantial, like Aritificer, Mystic, etc.

Yet there's been times where it has felt like a kick to the groin, like Mass Combat and Greyhawk Initiative.

I'd class the "Artificer" amongst that last category, actually.

Hrugner
2017-12-11, 06:47 PM
I completely missed the last one, elf variants 2, so it shouldn't bother me that they're missing this one.

Saiga
2017-12-11, 09:14 PM
Post Xanathar's the UA have been really bland. Feels like they're really lacking in direction on what to do next after that.

Regitnui
2017-12-11, 11:36 PM
Post Xanathar's the UA have been really bland. Feels like they're really lacking in direction on what to do next after that.

I have an idea, and I've said it at length, but I want to see if a summoning ritual I picked up works.

Eberron, Eberron, Eberron.
Best setting and WotC should do it next
Eberron, Eberron, Eberron

...waits...

Arkhios
2017-12-11, 11:50 PM
I have an idea, and I've said it at length, but I want to see if a summoning ritual I picked up works.

Eberron, Eberron, Eberron.
Best setting and WotC should do it next
Eberron, Eberron, Eberron

...waits...

Works for me :smallbiggrin:

toapat
2017-12-12, 12:29 AM
I'd class the "Artificer" amongst that last category, actually.

thats because the artificer probably should be named a Rigger in 5E and because they probably should have at least made it a half caster.

i feel like the Artificer we got was sorta like, the itteration you do when you run out of ideas and give up on a project, and come back two weeks later without some brilliant paradime shift in focus of design that actually works, because the ideaa was still stewing in contempt and you forced yourself to work through that.

i dont really believe that theres enough inherent design space for like, individual 3.5 artificer, Alchemist, or gunslinger really, but i do think you could work up something that makes the class work without feeling like an idea you just shoved out last minute

Arkhios
2017-12-12, 01:01 AM
I'd class the "Artificer" amongst that last category, actually.
thats because the artificer probably should be named a Rigger in 5E and because they probably should have at least made it a half caster.

i feel like the Artificer we got was sorta like, the itteration you do when you run out of ideas and give up on a project, and come back two weeks later without some brilliant paradime shift in focus of design that actually works, because the ideaa was still stewing in contempt and you forced yourself to work through that.

i dont really believe that theres enough inherent design space for like, individual 3.5 artificer, Alchemist, or gunslinger really, but i do think you could work up something that makes the class work without feeling like an idea you just shoved out last minute

Why people get so worked up about something that's not even in final form yet?

Cut them some slack! Many people out there have hoped to see Artificer brought into this edition, and they (wotc) are doing their best to iterate a best possible, most satisfying solution. Sure, current version might seem off for now, but that's why you got to keep the feedback coming! Unless you think artificer's not your thing, then don't bother. Shooting it down doesn't help the others who think the opposite. Just ignore the class(es) presented and be happy with whatever you think is fun, and let others have their own fun.

Despite the quotes, none of this is personal.

Regitnui
2017-12-12, 01:58 AM
Works for me :smallbiggrin:

Hmm. That's not what I was expecting. Did I do the spell wrong? *flips through ritual book* Perhaps a different incantation? If I can figure out what summons that one, I can keep them from discussions.

"I say Eberron is the best setting and anything other than that is horrible and should burn and nothing's wrong in Eberron".
-----
In more serious matters, I think the Artificer as presented is still going to see some fixes. After all, that sudden golem at level 6 really looked like a play test feature; something they tossed in to see how it worked and if it was worth expanding on later. I think that feature should be something like the druid's Wild Shape; any artificer can make a basic construct companion, but one subclass goes deeper and makes the companion their main feature.

Khrysaes
2017-12-12, 05:28 AM
-----
In more serious matters, I think the Artificer as presented is still going to see some fixes. After all, that sudden golem at level 6 really looked like a play test feature; something they tossed in to see how it worked and if it was worth expanding on later. I think that feature should be something like the druid's Wild Shape; any artificer can make a basic construct companion, but one subclass goes deeper and makes the companion their main feature.

I would think that Artificer could be a full caster. I mean look at what they did to bard!!!

But then the subclasses would focus on the 3.5 paths builds often took. Wand blasting, alchemy, golemancy, buffing, and elsewhile crafting.

I really want to see how they do Shifter in 5e. That is by far the most complex race from eberron, and the 3.5 mechanics, particularly scaling would be difficult to capture in 5e. I don't know how they were done in 4e.

Regitnui
2017-12-12, 05:40 AM
I really want to see how they do Shifter in 5e. That is by far the most complex race from eberron, and the 3.5 mechanics, particularly scaling would be difficult to capture in 5e. I don't know how they were done in 4e.

Personally I think the subrace system is perfect for the shifters. They've done scaling spells fairly well, so I have confidence in that at leasthe. My fear is they try to ram FR expectations into Eberron...

Vaz
2017-12-12, 05:41 AM
Why people get so worked up about something that's not even in final form yet?

Cut them some slack! Many people out there have hoped to see Artificer brought into this edition, and they (wotc) are doing their best to iterate a best possible, most satisfying solution. Sure, current version might seem off for now, but that's why you got to keep the feedback coming! Unless you think artificer's not your thing, then don't bother. Shooting it down doesn't help the others who think the opposite. Just ignore the class(es) presented and be happy with whatever you think is fun, and let others have their own fun.

Despite the quotes, none of this is personal.

Because you've got to wonder at what stage professional rules developers consider that stuff even remotely sensible, or interesting, or fun.

Khrysaes
2017-12-12, 05:46 AM
Personally I think the subrace system is perfect for the shifters. They've done scaling spells fairly well, so I have confidence in that at leasthe. My fear is they try to ram FR expectations into Eberron...

For the most part I would agree that a subrace system would be used to differentiate the different shifter powers.

And after a quick look up, 4e had their shifting as an encounter power. So likely a short rest racial power.

I am more specifically talking about how in 3.5 there were a myriad of feats that allowed for scaling of the ability, and interesting prestiege classes and alternative class features that built upon their shifting. I particularly like the Ranger & Druid class features in Races of Eberron, and the Were touched master.

As feats are a precious commodity in 3.5, I am not sure how that scaling would translate, if it would at all.

Regitnui
2017-12-12, 06:15 AM
Because you've got to wonder at what stage professional rules developers consider that stuff even remotely sensible, or interesting, or fun.

Right about the time they start development, of course. This isn't EA. They'll only design something they enjoy or think their players will enjoy. I've heard more positive reviews of the artificer than bad, and the base they gave is fertile ground for building on.


For the most part I would agree that a subrace system would be used to differentiate the different shifter powers.

And after a quick look up, 4e had their shifting as an encounter power. So likely a short rest racial power.

I am more specifically talking about how in 3.5 there were a myriad of feats that allowed for scaling of the ability, and interesting prestiege classes and alternative class features that built upon their shifting. I particularly like the Ranger & Druid class features in Races of Eberron, and the Were touched master.

As feats are a precious commodity in 3.5, I am not sure how that scaling would translate, if it would at all.

Oh, those. Yeah, that aspect would be tricky. They did reintroduce racial feats though. That would be a good start.

Arkhios
2017-12-12, 06:52 AM
Because you've got to wonder at what stage professional rules developers consider that stuff even remotely sensible, or interesting, or fun.

I respectfully disagree. I DO find the latest iteration interesting and fun. Just because a handful of people (apparently including you) feels otherwise doesn't mean they're any more right than the others. Opinion is an incredible thing. We all have the right to have one. And no one, not even you, can dictate what it should be. Opinions aren't worth fighting for or over.

Let's just agree to disagree.

Wartex1
2017-12-12, 08:33 AM
The Artificer as-is is completely disappointing, feeling barren of substance in its entirety.

Meanwhile, the Mystic is on the opposite end in that its chock-full of stuff, being incredibly front-loaded.

KorvinStarmast
2017-12-12, 08:52 AM
'I came up with these totally awesome (read pointless bumrag) rules while playing DnD, not really paying attention, and then had it edited into a book and we actually made money off that nonsense' was part of the sales pitch for Xanathars. I laughed, though I am glad that the Celestial Warlock is finally gone final.

I think that their next release will include a "finished" form of the Mystic. I also think that Dark Sun is not gonna happen, now that a 5e setting (the current WoTC AL lead is stepping into that project) from a 3rd party publisher is on the horizon: Scavenger (http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?544588-With-Robert-Adduci-stepping-down-from-AL-he-talks-about-the-next-5e-Campaign-Setting).

Arkhios
2017-12-12, 08:59 AM
I laughed, though I am glad that the Celestial Warlock is finally gone final.

I think that their next release will include a "finished" form of the Mystic. I also think that Dark Sun is not gonna happen, now that a 5e setting (the current WoTC AL lead is stepping into that project) from a 3rd party publisher is on the horizon: Scavenger (http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?544588-With-Robert-Adduci-stepping-down-from-AL-he-talks-about-the-next-5e-Campaign-Setting).

The fact that this Scavenger is already proclaimed as a 3rd-party project does, in fact, suggest nothing about Dark Sun being updated.

Anonymouswizard
2017-12-12, 11:31 AM
I think that their next release will include a "finished" form of the Mystic. I also think that Dark Sun is not gonna happen, now that a 5e setting (the current WoTC AL lead is stepping into that project) from a 3rd party publisher is on the horizon: Scavenger (http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?544588-With-Robert-Adduci-stepping-down-from-AL-he-talks-about-the-next-5e-Campaign-Setting).

I'd say that not only does a third party setting mean nothing to WotC, but Scavanger looks like it'll have some differences to Dark Sun. More interaction with other planes of existence for one, as well as fewer murderous 20th level sorcerers wizards about looking to genocide their way into ultimate power (because Dragons really do seem to be the most powerful beings on Athas). It looks a little more hopeful, and the art style looks a little different.

On the other hand, I'm not expecting Dark Sun soon. Maybe if 5e ends up lasting a decade we'll get an official Dark Sun conversion, but I think the most likely settings to be used are those that connect to the FR easily, and that means Spelljammer and Planescape.

It'll be interesting if they are working on a Planescape product, especially as they'll have to decide how Realms-centric they want it (vanilla Planescape obviously doesn't have the Realms-specific bits of fluff, and it'll be a case of keeping things like the Wall of the Faithless and Weave in versus going for that classic Planescape flavour).

toapat
2017-12-12, 11:34 AM
Why people get so worked up about something that's not even in final form yet?

Despite the quotes, none of this is personal.

im more criticizing the handling of subclasses and the sales pitch than the class. i think they got the idea of the old Artificer right (if not a mechanical match) in the new system. But most of all i think they botched the Sales Pitch of the class rather than the technical which they can adjust in development.

like, the 5E artificer is the guy that makes magic items on the fly as needed to solve problems, but theyre also the alchemist, gunslinger, and the golem master. youre ability to juryrig everything is a little too broad for just the Magic item dude.

jaappleton
2017-12-12, 12:06 PM
Why people get so worked up about something that's not even in final form yet?

Sometimes, what comes before the final form is deeply troubling.

Ask Krillen about Frieza's final form. Didn't work out well for him, did it?!

Vaz
2017-12-12, 06:08 PM
Opinions aren't worth fighting for or over.

Yes they are.

Arkhios
2017-12-12, 06:11 PM
Sometimes, what comes before the final form is deeply troubling.

Ask Krillen about Frieza's final form. Didn't work out well for him, did it?!
Pardon my ignorance, who are Krillen and Frieza?


Yes they are.

It's an endless battle without a clear winner, ergo it's pointless in the end (which may never come). I'd prefer doing something more productive instead.

But, if you want to waste your time on that, be my guest!

Vaz
2017-12-12, 06:31 PM
It's an endless battle without a clear winner, ergo it's pointless in the end (which may never come). I'd prefer doing something more productive instead.

But, if you want to waste your time on that, be my guest!

Thanks for your permission.

Arkhios
2017-12-12, 06:35 PM
Thanks for your permission.

I tried to be nice towards you for a long time but I'm not oblivious of your veiled insults and mockery towards me. Have a nice trip to the ignore list.

Wartex1
2017-12-12, 08:05 PM
Pardon my ignorance, who are Krillen and Frieza?

Krillin and Frieza are DBZ characters, with Krillin being Goku's best friend and Frieza being evil space-conquerer.

toapat
2017-12-12, 08:05 PM
good news, Reddit found the December Unearthed Arcana.

Its here (http://www.dmsguild.com/product/228662/X-MARKS-THE-SPOT-A-Plane-Shift-Ixalan-Adventure)

Wartex1
2017-12-12, 09:52 PM
Aren't the Plane Shift articles completely separate than UA?

Though this one is alright. No player options except a few animals for Wildshape though, which is a little disappointing after the Amonkhet supplement which introduced 5(?) Races and 4 subclasses?

toapat
2017-12-12, 10:46 PM
Aren't the Plane Shift articles completely separate than UA?

Though this one is alright. No player options except a few animals for Wildshape though, which is a little disappointing after the Amonkhet supplement which introduced 5(?) Races and 4 subclasses?

the other half of the plane shift comes out next month.

the player options can already somewhat be excavated from the character sheets at the end of the document

When Greyhawk Initiative came out, we decided that Plane Shift: Almondcat was the real UA for the month back then too

Tectorman
2017-12-12, 11:20 PM
Krillin and Frieza are DBZ characters, with Krillin being Goku's best friend and Frieza being evil space-conquerer.

To explain the reference fully...

While facing the space conquerer Frieza, Krillin and his friends were completely outclassed. Krillin himself ended up impaled on the minotaur-like horns growing out of Frieza’s head (he got better thanks to the local white mage). It was also revealed that Frieza had two more transformations to go, each stronger than the body he was already in (which is how “this isn’t even my final form yet” and other such references to a final form became memes). Eventually, the battle progressed to the point where the tyrant was indeed in his final form and made Krillin explode.

Regitnui
2017-12-12, 11:20 PM
Aren't the Plane Shift articles completely separate than UA?

Though this one is alright. No player options except a few animals for Wildshape though, which is a little disappointing after the Amonkhet supplement which introduced 5(?) Races and 4 subclasses?

The Plane shift supplements come out after the block has been completed. Rivals of Ixalan, the second and final set of the Ixalan block, has yet to even start previews. However, a Plane Shift: Unstable, could be hilarious.

Arkhios
2017-12-12, 11:40 PM
Krillin and Frieza are DBZ characters, with Krillin being Goku's best friend and Frieza being evil space-conquerer.


To explain the reference fully...

While facing the space conquerer Frieza, Krillin and his friends were completely outclassed. Krillin himself ended up impaled on the minotaur-like horns growing out of Frieza’s head (he got better thanks to the local white mage). It was also revealed that Frieza had two more transformations to go, each stronger than the body he was already in (which is how “this isn’t even my final form yet” and other such references to a final form became memes). Eventually, the battle progressed to the point where the tyrant was indeed in his final form and made Krillin explode.

Ah, gotcha!

I never watched DBZ extensively when it came from TV when I was younger, as it didn't particularly pique my interest. I've mostly seen episodes sporadically, and so I'm not very well acquainted with the story.

toapat
2017-12-13, 01:08 AM
However, a Plane Shift: Unstable, could be hilarious.

There are previews for Rivals, and one of them is Tolarian Academy.

So, would Plane Shift: Bablovia have THE SWORD OF DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS or THE SWORD OF MAGIC THE GATHERING

my idea for Sword of DnD in PS: Bablovia:

Sword of Dungeons and Dragons
Artifact Weapon, (All), requires attunement

This unshaped rift in the Universe ripples with untold and limitless power, as its ability to shape the cosmos radiates with unimagined power.

While attuned to this item, The DM rolls a new character and replaces yours. you become the DM

Anonymouswizard
2017-12-13, 02:32 PM
good news, Reddit found the December Unearthed Arcana.

Its here (http://www.dmsguild.com/product/228662/X-MARKS-THE-SPOT-A-Plane-Shift-Ixalan-Adventure)

Time to have a peak.

Treasure looks interesting, I'm waiting for next month's UA now so it can be complete.

Scots Dragon
2017-12-13, 03:09 PM
Eberron, Eberron, Eberron.
Best setting and WotC should do it next
Eberron, Eberron, Eberron

*cough*noteveninthetopfive*cough*

Honestly I'd like to see them tackle Planescape or Greyhawk next. Greyhawk would be an obvious next step given the sheer absurd number of Greyhawk references that were in the last couple of adventure releases, including pretty much using some of the most notable Greyhawk-specific adventures in Tales from the Yawning Portal.

Something like a Flanaess Adventurer's Guide or Free City Gazetteer wouldn't be too terrible.

Waterdeep Merch
2017-12-13, 03:19 PM
*cough*noteveninthetopfive*cough*

Honestly I'd like to see them tackle Planescape or Greyhawk next. Greyhawk would be an obvious next step given the sheer absurd number of Greyhawk references that were in the last couple of adventure releases, including pretty much using some of the most notable Greyhawk-specific adventures in Tales from the Yawning Portal.

Something like a Flanaess Adventurer's Guide or Free City Gazetteer wouldn't be too terrible.
I think they might be setting up the idea that it's not that uncommon to walk through a portal and end up going from Faerun to Oerth, just so they can have both (and Barovia!) in one massive setting for AL/storyline purposes. Perhaps starting with an adventure to return Mordenkainen to a beleaguered Greyhawk, maybe even a fan service-filled foray into the ruins of Castle Greyhawk.

If they do take this route, I'm pretty certain Planescape won't be far off. It fits their hardcover module system well, allowing players to organically move from one setting to the other.

Regitnui
2017-12-13, 03:27 PM
*cough*noteveninthetopfive*cough*

Hush. From the last setting survey:


Not surprisingly, our most popular settings from prior editions landed at the top of the rankings, with Eberron, Ravenloft, Dark Sun, Planescape, and the Forgotten Realms all proving equally popular.

They've done Ravenloft, everything so far's been FR and Dark Sun is wildly different. That leaves the "Plane book" and "Eberron" as the most likely options according to the survey. Greyhawk is Forgotten Realms with different names and a slightly older legacy. All of the top settings there have distinct identities; "Noir wide magic", "gothic evil", "psionic post-apocalypse", "Literal centre of the multiiverse" and "high fantasy". Greyhawk is another "high fantasy", so they'll likely update that stuff into FR.

MeeposFire
2017-12-13, 03:46 PM
*cough*noteveninthetopfive*cough*

Honestly I'd like to see them tackle Planescape or Greyhawk next. Greyhawk would be an obvious next step given the sheer absurd number of Greyhawk references that were in the last couple of adventure releases, including pretty much using some of the most notable Greyhawk-specific adventures in Tales from the Yawning Portal.

Something like a Flanaess Adventurer's Guide or Free City Gazetteer wouldn't be too terrible.

Frankly Greyhawk would be a waste of time and money for WotC I would think. It has never done well as novels or games and fills the same basic niche as FR while at the same time being less popular (whether you feel that is intrinsic or TSR/WotC only giving it mostly lip service for decades, even in 3e it was mostly lip service, is a matter of opinion and point of view). As for the references they have been making references in the books to all sorts of things from different settings so to me that does not mean that they are seriously thinking about going all in on a setting for a book. This edition is being very choosy on what it wants to make into books so something as limited as a Greyhawk only item would be a stretch.

The same applies to Dragonlance though that did at least have some success initially as novels but it really petered out over time.

I do think WotC learned some lessons from TSR and one of the big ones was do not break up your fanbase by having too many settings going especially ones that fit the same basic premise.

Looking at that I do agree that Planescape will probably get some love though I am not sure they are going to call it a setting but rather give you a book (or books) that flesh out the planes that will include things that were in the setting but with Planescape it can be used with other settings so I think they will play it out as an advanced add on to all settings such as FR. I would not be completely surprised if they did the same with Spelljammer and they could even put it in the same book to pad things out. They could then let people on DM GUild create to their liking all the additional things that both settings would want but WotC may not want to deal with.

As for actual settings that get potentially a full book treatment or the like I think that may be limited to settings that do not work well in a setting like FR. To me that screams Dark Sun, Eberron, and settings like that which have very different styles than FR, Dragonlance, Greyhawk, and sadly Mystara.