Hecuba
2020-10-19, 01:48 PM
This comment in another thread got me off on a tangent.
Is it weird that I like the Outlands and Sigil, but hate the Great Wheel Cosmology?
I agree, to an extent. The while certain detailed aspects of the 4e cosmology were problematic, the idea of the "Astral Sea" makes possible a far more unified conceptual model of what the outer planes - and the transitive planes - actually are.
Importantly, it also gives a conceptual model for unifying the Planes and the Crystal spheres into a coherent cosmology. It also gives insight into the mechanics of divine beings.
Ultimately, the defining trait of the Outer Planes is that they are made of belief in the same way that the material plane is made of material. One of the more direct implications of that is that belief will have gravity.
If the Outer Planes are held together by the gravity of similar ideas (gravity-via-belief), then they end up being very different in nature than the Astral Plane itself: under such a model the outer planes would be self-contained regions within the Astral Plane, much as the Crystal Spheres are self-contained regions within the Material plane. That which is regarded as the Astral Plane itself, rather than the Outer Planes, is the equivalent of the Phlogiston.
Deities can then be regarded as a rough analog for planets. Their divine realm is the area for which they have sufficient gravity-via-belief to be dominant: the equivalent of a planet having enough gravity to clear it's orbit. Unlike planets proper, they are sentient and generally individual - but that is a result of the outer planes being a place made of belief and thought rather than material. Demigods, saints, etc. fill a similar conceptual space as moons and asteroids. In FR contexts, this also provides a conceptual framework for why (from a deity's perspective), Chosen are a thing: they are individuals who have an are sufficiently impactful on the conceptual space that makes up a divine realm to have effects on the gravity-via-belief dynamics of that realm during their lifetime on the prime material.
This model, in turn, provides us with a reason why deities with similar portfolios end up in conflict and/or absorbing one another: if they are close enough in their conceptual space, then they will be force to confront one another by simple gravity. The window for both deities to remain both independent and stable in a shared gravity-via-belief space would be quite narrow - it would be far more likely the one would end up subordinated to the other (like a moon), possibly after an explosive impact (like the Terra-Theia impact that formed Luna).
Is it weird that I like the Outlands and Sigil, but hate the Great Wheel Cosmology?
I agree, to an extent. The while certain detailed aspects of the 4e cosmology were problematic, the idea of the "Astral Sea" makes possible a far more unified conceptual model of what the outer planes - and the transitive planes - actually are.
Importantly, it also gives a conceptual model for unifying the Planes and the Crystal spheres into a coherent cosmology. It also gives insight into the mechanics of divine beings.
Ultimately, the defining trait of the Outer Planes is that they are made of belief in the same way that the material plane is made of material. One of the more direct implications of that is that belief will have gravity.
If the Outer Planes are held together by the gravity of similar ideas (gravity-via-belief), then they end up being very different in nature than the Astral Plane itself: under such a model the outer planes would be self-contained regions within the Astral Plane, much as the Crystal Spheres are self-contained regions within the Material plane. That which is regarded as the Astral Plane itself, rather than the Outer Planes, is the equivalent of the Phlogiston.
Deities can then be regarded as a rough analog for planets. Their divine realm is the area for which they have sufficient gravity-via-belief to be dominant: the equivalent of a planet having enough gravity to clear it's orbit. Unlike planets proper, they are sentient and generally individual - but that is a result of the outer planes being a place made of belief and thought rather than material. Demigods, saints, etc. fill a similar conceptual space as moons and asteroids. In FR contexts, this also provides a conceptual framework for why (from a deity's perspective), Chosen are a thing: they are individuals who have an are sufficiently impactful on the conceptual space that makes up a divine realm to have effects on the gravity-via-belief dynamics of that realm during their lifetime on the prime material.
This model, in turn, provides us with a reason why deities with similar portfolios end up in conflict and/or absorbing one another: if they are close enough in their conceptual space, then they will be force to confront one another by simple gravity. The window for both deities to remain both independent and stable in a shared gravity-via-belief space would be quite narrow - it would be far more likely the one would end up subordinated to the other (like a moon), possibly after an explosive impact (like the Terra-Theia impact that formed Luna).