Rhocian Xothara
2021-05-05, 02:35 PM
So I'm trying to develop a sort of 'Ultimate Arcanist' build. You know how munchkins/min-maxers tend to multiclass Barbarian/Fighter/Paladin to create an awesome martial build? I've wanted to do this for some time with a spellcaster, and for a couple of years now I've just been using Coffeelocks.
The biggest problem with multiclassing spellcasters is that whilst they benefit from the multiclassing rules re: spell slots, their 'known spells' are still tied to their individual classes. My Sorcadin for a podcast game is Paladin 6/Sorcerer 4 and whilst he enjoys 4th-level spell slots for things like smites and upcast spells, he only knows up to 2nd level spells. Kinda sucks next to the Storm Sorcerer 8/Tempest Cleric 2 who can tear through enemies with Lightning Bolt - usually for max damage, too, with their Channel Divinity.
So spellcaster multiclasses lose a lot of ground on spells known - both in number and in level.
However, I believe I may have fixed this, using Wizard?
Wizards can write spells into their spellbook; the spells they write into it are tied to the spell levels that they can prepare (so a CL3 Wizard couldn't write a 'Wish' Spell into their book as they don't have 9th-level spell slots). However, using the multiclassing rule for spell slots, a multiclassed character of, say, Sorcerer 3/Warlock 3/Wizard 3 might only have 1st and 2nd level spells known and available by their first two classes, but a Wizard can have up to 5th-level spells in their spellbook, as they have 1 5th-level spell slot available and thus can prepare it.
The drawback is that whilst their spellbook's spells aren't necessarily tied to their Wizard Level, the number of spells they can prepare is (Int modifier + Wizard Level). Which is fine - no need to prepare 1st or 2nd level spells (leave that to your Sorcerer/Warlock levels); just focus on the higher-level spells that you otherwise couldn't cast.
Seems like a minor downside considering it bridges the gap for one of the biggest weaknesses of spellcaster multiclasses.
I've read and re-read the PHB on this - particularly regarding the Spellbook and Spell preparation. I'm convinced I'm right. I just need to confirm it with the community before I go and embarass myself at the table.
TL;DR: Is this all correct?
The biggest problem with multiclassing spellcasters is that whilst they benefit from the multiclassing rules re: spell slots, their 'known spells' are still tied to their individual classes. My Sorcadin for a podcast game is Paladin 6/Sorcerer 4 and whilst he enjoys 4th-level spell slots for things like smites and upcast spells, he only knows up to 2nd level spells. Kinda sucks next to the Storm Sorcerer 8/Tempest Cleric 2 who can tear through enemies with Lightning Bolt - usually for max damage, too, with their Channel Divinity.
So spellcaster multiclasses lose a lot of ground on spells known - both in number and in level.
However, I believe I may have fixed this, using Wizard?
Wizards can write spells into their spellbook; the spells they write into it are tied to the spell levels that they can prepare (so a CL3 Wizard couldn't write a 'Wish' Spell into their book as they don't have 9th-level spell slots). However, using the multiclassing rule for spell slots, a multiclassed character of, say, Sorcerer 3/Warlock 3/Wizard 3 might only have 1st and 2nd level spells known and available by their first two classes, but a Wizard can have up to 5th-level spells in their spellbook, as they have 1 5th-level spell slot available and thus can prepare it.
The drawback is that whilst their spellbook's spells aren't necessarily tied to their Wizard Level, the number of spells they can prepare is (Int modifier + Wizard Level). Which is fine - no need to prepare 1st or 2nd level spells (leave that to your Sorcerer/Warlock levels); just focus on the higher-level spells that you otherwise couldn't cast.
Seems like a minor downside considering it bridges the gap for one of the biggest weaknesses of spellcaster multiclasses.
I've read and re-read the PHB on this - particularly regarding the Spellbook and Spell preparation. I'm convinced I'm right. I just need to confirm it with the community before I go and embarass myself at the table.
TL;DR: Is this all correct?