Condé
2021-06-08, 04:40 AM
Hello,
Actually diving into Improving monsters (https://www.d20srd.org/srd/improvingMonsters.htm).
An interesting case, for me, is the Duergar. Maybe most people will think they are definitly worth their CR 1 but... Since I discovered recently the "Lesser-Duergar" which are bascially Duergar... Witthout the LA+1. Which mean you could make a NPC lesser-duergar with 2 levels of warrior instead of 1 and still be CR 1.
Sooo. Which one do you think is worth its CR 1 ?
The actual Duergar (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/dwarf.htm), with only 9hp, but a huge AC, only 20 feets movements but capable of being invisible AND to get Enlarged for 1min. (So for the duration of a fight at this level and even more)
Or a Lesser-Duergar, with 2 levels of Warrior... So with something like +1HD (1d8+2 = 6hp), +1 BAB, +1 Fort Save (already good so not so much of a difference) and being able to stay invisble/huge for a longer period of time but only one-time/day... And some skill points. But... That would be it. No feat, or anything.
Note: I always thought playable races with LA+1 aren't worth it (Aasimar, Tiefling, Duergar...) The lesser version from the Player's guide to Faërun brought lesser versions of these races. Some people say that make them playable, but not overpowered. I'm one of them.
So, why a Duergar should be CR1 when they could be CR1/2 for basically... No change whatsoever if you were using the lesser version ?
Because, as far as I know, Aasimar, Tiefling etc... Lose their Outsider and become Humanoids with the planetouched subtype. And that's it. For duergar, and lesser-duergar, they seem to not lose anything. Except their immunity to poison, paralysis and phantasms and some skill points. I mean, losing some immunities suck, but is it worth a LA+1 ? Don't think so.
What do you guys think ?
I know this look pretty specific, but I guess this idea can be expanded to many, many monsters or NPC out there.
Cheers.
Actually diving into Improving monsters (https://www.d20srd.org/srd/improvingMonsters.htm).
An interesting case, for me, is the Duergar. Maybe most people will think they are definitly worth their CR 1 but... Since I discovered recently the "Lesser-Duergar" which are bascially Duergar... Witthout the LA+1. Which mean you could make a NPC lesser-duergar with 2 levels of warrior instead of 1 and still be CR 1.
Sooo. Which one do you think is worth its CR 1 ?
The actual Duergar (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/dwarf.htm), with only 9hp, but a huge AC, only 20 feets movements but capable of being invisible AND to get Enlarged for 1min. (So for the duration of a fight at this level and even more)
Or a Lesser-Duergar, with 2 levels of Warrior... So with something like +1HD (1d8+2 = 6hp), +1 BAB, +1 Fort Save (already good so not so much of a difference) and being able to stay invisble/huge for a longer period of time but only one-time/day... And some skill points. But... That would be it. No feat, or anything.
Note: I always thought playable races with LA+1 aren't worth it (Aasimar, Tiefling, Duergar...) The lesser version from the Player's guide to Faërun brought lesser versions of these races. Some people say that make them playable, but not overpowered. I'm one of them.
So, why a Duergar should be CR1 when they could be CR1/2 for basically... No change whatsoever if you were using the lesser version ?
Because, as far as I know, Aasimar, Tiefling etc... Lose their Outsider and become Humanoids with the planetouched subtype. And that's it. For duergar, and lesser-duergar, they seem to not lose anything. Except their immunity to poison, paralysis and phantasms and some skill points. I mean, losing some immunities suck, but is it worth a LA+1 ? Don't think so.
What do you guys think ?
I know this look pretty specific, but I guess this idea can be expanded to many, many monsters or NPC out there.
Cheers.