PDA

View Full Version : Optimization Theurge vs Class with two spell lists, which is stronger?



Jervis
2022-01-23, 11:30 PM
This is a bit of a weird discussion but it was born from a bit of theory crafting for a possible upcoming 3.pf game. I was poking around the pathfinder srd and came across the Theurge class (Kobold Press) https://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/3rd-party-classes/kobold-press-open-design/theurge/#TOC-Spell-Synthesis-Su-. At first i thought it was completely broken, because well it is, but it made me think. The character i was making was a early entry mystic theurge using Improved Sigil Krau Illumian with Wizard and Archivist to hop into Mystic Theurge at level 4. That character has the same double bonus spells and same spell access with double the base spell slots, all i really loose is a level of casting in one class and two in another, and with Inner Sea guild affiliation rules being probably available that stops being a problem as early as level 8.

So it made me think, which of these is stronger? The multiclass character has a feat tax of 1 and ends up with double the spells while being Int sad at the cost of being 1 level of spellcasting behind, not even CL because Illumian things, until level 8 where they catch up. That Theurge class means that, if it was allowed, i could potentially hop into other PrCs and not loose CL but have fewer spells per day. The theurge would let me keep my concept in place and hop into a Gish or weird casting class, or maybe even finally get to play a Durthan, but over all is that really a power bump over the absurd amount of spells a early entry theurge gets, especially when a affiliation benefit exists that fixes lost spellcaster levels up to a cap of character level?

That's mostly the question id like to posit. If given the choice between these two, which would you pick and which do you think is the better of the two? Assume pathfinder base rules (so decrease skill point requirements for everything by 3) with official pathfinder (plus the other stuff i've mentioned) and 3.5 content allowed for the purposes of discussion. Treat things that are different in both as alternate base classes or alternate choices with the same name.

Beni-Kujaku
2022-01-24, 03:06 AM
I don't think the question of whether an optimized prestige class is stronger than a pure base class is really relevant. Your Mystic Theurge is most probably stronger, by being SAD and being able to spam their high-level spells more easily.
However, the 3rd party Theurge is still stronger than a wizard of equal level, being able to cast from both spell lists, to cast two spells with one action and to use cantrips of both sides, while having only a few arcane spells less per day than a wizard. It doesn't have a school specialization, so that makes it slightly weaker, but overall it's still much more versatile, even being able to add to its spell/prayerbook any arcane or divine spell. That's just a 3.5 archivist on steroids. And when a 3rd party class is much stronger than the archetypal tier 1 caster, you know it's broken.

Jervis
2022-01-24, 10:20 AM
Yeah the class is definitely borked. I more just thought it was a unique thought experiment

Kurald Galain
2022-01-24, 10:32 AM
Come on, that theurge is as ridiculous as the Lightning Warrior. At least it doesn't get a familiar...

Jervis
2022-01-24, 11:27 AM
Come on, that theurge is as ridiculous as the Lightning Warrior. At least it doesn't get a familiar...

Yeah it’s kinda dumb, looks like something off dnd wiki. That said, lightning warrior?

AsuraKyoko
2022-01-24, 12:07 PM
Yeah it’s kinda dumb, looks like something off dnd wiki. That said, lightning warrior?

It's an old homebrew joke class that was basically a gestalted Ranger/Wizard. The writeup claims that the class "sacrificed power for flavor" because it didn't get a familiar and didn't specialize in a school like a wizard, and constantly refers to the class as being "weak".

The writeup also includes this glorious section:

Playing a Lightning Warrior
You don't play a Lightning Warrior; the Lightning Warrior plays you.

This is a transcription of the class: https://www.myth-weavers.com/wiki/index.php/Lightning_Warrior

Jervis
2022-01-24, 12:28 PM
It's an old homebrew joke class that was basically a gestalted Ranger/Wizard. The writeup claims that the class "sacrificed power for flavor" because it didn't get a familiar and didn't specialize in a school like a wizard, and constantly refers to the class as being "weak".

The writeup also includes this glorious section:


This is a transcription of the class: https://www.myth-weavers.com/wiki/index.php/Lightning_Warrior

To be fair it can’t specialize so it’s limited to having 1 more spell per level than a wiz… wait

Ramza00
2022-01-24, 03:16 PM
If you are doing 3rd party pathfinder, Arcforge in one of its books (spheres of influence) has a two feat tax to cast other spells from other spell list in your domain of magic. The feats are Magical Lorekeeper and Skill Focus Spellcraft.

Thus a wizard can cast magus and bard spells but he can not cast cleric or druid spells. One must have access to the spell to add it to your class list like a scroll or a magical item like a staff.

Writing this now and I realised it is even less of a feat tax if you are planning to go master specialist, seven fold veil, or archmage as a prestige class since those classes either need or give skill focus spellcraft anyway. One less feat tax to become a wizard who is an arcane version of the archivist.

Of course for improved signal krau anyway, it is worth it for going cleric and doing long acting buffs like save boosters, ac boosters, perception in darkness or snow, etc. Use those almost free spell slots for the entire party. Sure you are a level behind with a Wizard in regards to offense but you are still ahead of a sorcerer in versatility and still get your strongest spells with the same progression.