theangelJean
2023-07-27, 08:43 PM
In a webcomic thread, someone has made a comment that (a) alludes, extremely vaguely, to some real-world events, and (2) contains an idea that is interesting, but also incorporates some harmful sexist assumptions.
For the record, I don't think part (a) crosses the line into "politics" and I don't think (b) crosses the line into "offensive". I could report it and let the mods decide, but that's not my question.
Is there any forum-acceptable way for me to engage with the poster, if I wanted to disentangle some of the sexist assumptions in part (2)? I feel like they (the assumptions) are harmful enough to be worth calling out, and there's a potential for a productive discussion to separate the interesting idea from its sexist baggage. Or would that count as me bringing "politics" in where it doesn't belong?
Obviously I wouldn't do this in the webcomic thread, as it would be wildly off-topic. I was actually thinking of PMing the poster to discuss. Just checking if doing so would be against forum rules?
For the record, I don't think part (a) crosses the line into "politics" and I don't think (b) crosses the line into "offensive". I could report it and let the mods decide, but that's not my question.
Is there any forum-acceptable way for me to engage with the poster, if I wanted to disentangle some of the sexist assumptions in part (2)? I feel like they (the assumptions) are harmful enough to be worth calling out, and there's a potential for a productive discussion to separate the interesting idea from its sexist baggage. Or would that count as me bringing "politics" in where it doesn't belong?
Obviously I wouldn't do this in the webcomic thread, as it would be wildly off-topic. I was actually thinking of PMing the poster to discuss. Just checking if doing so would be against forum rules?