Why is O'Chul still wearing boots?

[HamsterOfTheGod]

What? Redcloak never heard of foot torture?

[Homunculus]

He's a dwarf. Dwarvish feet will torture you.

[Proteus]

... He's not a dwarf. He's human.

Perhaps Redcloak is saving foot torture for a rainy day.

[SPoD]

Forcing someone to swim in acid with boots is actually HARDER than if they took them. And Redcloak was in a hurry to get this started, so he didn't bother taking them off.

[Yendor]

The wight can only wear one pair of boots.

[Admiral_Kelly]

Artistic license; O-Chul's character wears boots. Or perhaps, as others have pointed out, they were put on for the 'Will He Live?' challenge and Redcloak did not bother to remove them.

Alternate Answer: You are quibbling over a minute detail of a webcomic consisting of stick figures in a world where DnD rules are on par with the laws of physics. Stop worrying about these things.

[Callista]

I agree; it's artistic. He's already wearing very little, and the boots help give his character some definition. Without them, he'd look "unfinished", I think.

[Shas aia Toriia]

Come to think of it, you're right, but in a different way.
I'd have thought another wight would have sore feet by now.

[Trazoi]

O'Chul's probably been wearing those boots since hitting puberty. He'd have the worst case of boot feet in the whole OotS-verse. Given that Redcloak has lost his pine-fresh air cleanser he'd prefer it that the paladin keeps his boots on, thank you very much.