New Bard Spell.

[Lady Tialait]

Were no strangers to love. You know the rules and so do i. A full commitments what Im thinking of, You wouldnt get this from any other guy I just wanna tell you how Im feeling. Gotta make you understand Never gonna let you down Never gonna run around and desert you Never gonna make you cry Never gonna say goodbye Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you.
Rick Roll'd
Enchantment [Mind-Effecting]
Level: Bard 1, Wizard 2
Components: V, S
Casting Time: Full-round
Range: Close (25 ft. + 5 ft./2 levels)
Duration: 1/round per level
Saving Throw: Will Negates (see Text)
Spell Resistance: Yes.

This spell is considered most vile, and the mere speaking of it often sends Wizards into pure fits of rage. When you cast this spell, every round the target cannot say anything but, Never Gunna give you up. This gives a 70% change of loosing a spell cast, the target is allowed a saving throw each round to negate the effect for that round.

Only spells with Verbal components are effected.


Feedback?

[The Demented One]

Ah, damn it! Due to a severe case of memetic disorder, just reading that spell's title got the sung stuck in my head, and forced me to mentally view that video. And I lost the game.

In terms of actual mechanics - the duration says 1 round/minute, probably should say 1 round/level. You should probably specify only spells with verbal components are affected, and I think 90% may, may be a bit high for such a low level spell. This would fit perfectly into a less-than-serious setting like Sigil Prep, nicely done.

[Lady Tialait]

woot!..and fix'd the problems. I wasn't sure how powerful..and the 1/round per minet was my mind going in three places at once. I was thinking either 1/round per level or 1/minet per level...it got mashed up in my mind.

[Faithless]

...Genius.

[Silence]

This has already been done on a different forum.

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1057145 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0). They did a better job than you, frankly.

[Tempest Fennac]

That isn;t a bad idea. Have you considered entering it in this contest? http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4506514#post4506514

[Lady Tialait]

This has already been done on a different forum.

http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1057145 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0). They did a better job than you, frankly.

*fits of rage! fits of rage!* Shoot, i just lost my spell...

Oh, and I don't like contests that much I'll be abstaining from it.

[Silence]

*fits of rage! fits of rage!* Shoot, i just lost my spell...

Oh, and I don't like contests that much I'll be abstaining from it.

I can't believe you actually fell for that.

[chef781]

Upon seeing this thread, my in character wizard, Malde, said this:


I HATE YOU!! WHY DID YOU UTTER SAID SPELL??!!?? WHY??!!?? :furious: YOU IGNORAMUS GOON! YOU **** FOOL! WHY DID YOU UTTER THE SPELL??!!??!! :furious:

[Severedevil]

A re-fluff of Tasha's Hideous Laughter would seem more fitting to a rickroll, and more broadly applicable. Although... a rickroll is most commonly a trapped hyperlink, along the lines of Sepia Snake Sigil...

[Lady Tialait]

A re-fluff of Tasha's Hideous Laughter would seem more fitting to a rickroll, and more broadly applicable. Although... a rickroll is most commonly a trapped hyperlink, along the lines of Sepia Snake Sigil...

The problem with the first one, is Rick Roll'd never puts someone prone.

As for the Sepia Snake Sigil, that is a bit more of a maybe, but the problem with it being that spell does damage, and really isn't wnat I'm doing for.