My understanding of Apogee's post is that the vig claimed to have targeted AV, not rogue or anyone else. Which means Would like confirmation of that from Apogee, though.
Not sure about Xi, but I'm not saying the vig knew AV was the seer. That was just a stroke of either really good or really bad luck for them, depending on their alignment.
What I'm saying is that a town vig would have had a lot of better options for targets, like Snowblaze, or anyone who people were suspicious of D1. A wolf vig, on the other hand, would have had good reason to kill town!AV just because they're a good player, even without knowing they were the seer. So wolf vig just makes more sense.
That being said, if the vig is a wolf, then obviously wolves and vig would not have both targeted the same person. So that does also make me more suspicious of Xi, by removing another possibility for the missing wolf kill.
What about Snowblaze's post made you want to trust her?
Okay, but you weren't actually blocked, you still performed your action, right? You just performed it on yourself. Which might be pointless for you, but it's not pointless if the target of the redirect is a wolf doing a kill. So I think there was no need to account for that action, since it's irrelevant to the question of "why did wolves not kill", and therefore you just gave wolves some information about your power with no benefit to town.
(To clarify, I don't think this was a wolf move on your part, since if you were a wolf there'd be no need for you to hint about your role to other wolves. I just think it was a bad move.)
Oh well, not like there's any way to change that now.
Thanks! I think you may have misunderstood my second question, though - I was asking if the player with Induce Madness could target the same person twice. Eg can they pick a Player A, and then redirect Player A to Player A.