Is the sunk cost fallacy always a fallacy?

[Dasick]

But that was what I described?

PRetty much yeah, it was more clarifying

Also I'm pretty confident you do not always have a chance of winning as more and more cards are shown on the table, like when the best hand you can make includes none of the cards on your person, but I think that is beside the point.

As someone who enjoys poker quite a bit, it's extremely frustrating how often someone has a non zero chance to make the better hand when you go all in before all the cards are drawn.


Just going over this comic, and I have to say that it pretty much answers everything in this thread

https://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots1262.html

Also note what Oona says in panel 9.

I like to be a devil's advocate a lot, but I think this page and Oona sum up what I think about Redcloack