New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    I wish I knew...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Okay, I am, specifically, wanting to reduce the cost of a metamagic feat by one to a minimum of zero. However, I neither wish to use Incantatrix or DMM to do it.

    I know there is a feat in the Dragonomicon, but it reduces to a minimum of one, which makes it impractical for my purposes.

    Basically, I'm wanting to create a spontaneous caster who is able to apply Silent Spell to all of his spells without cost. All day long. Until he runs out of spells.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Underlord View Post
    All hail great Shneekeythulhu! Ia Ia Shneeky fthagn
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quite possibly, the best rebuttal I have ever witnessed.
    Joker Bard - the DM's solution to the Batman Wizard.
    Takahashi no Onisan - The scariest Samurai alive
    Incarnum and YOU: a reference guide
    Soulmelds, by class and slot: Another Incarnum reference
    Multiclassing for Newbies: A reference guide for the rest of us

    My homebrew world in progress: Falcora

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AmberVael's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Quote Originally Posted by ShneekeyTheLost View Post
    Okay, I am, specifically, wanting to reduce the cost of a metamagic feat by one to a minimum of zero. However, I neither wish to use Incantatrix or DMM to do it.

    I know there is a feat in the Dragonomicon, but it reduces to a minimum of one, which makes it impractical for my purposes.

    Basically, I'm wanting to create a spontaneous caster who is able to apply Silent Spell to all of his spells without cost. All day long. Until he runs out of spells.
    What level are you looking at? I mean, there is "automatic silent spell" at epic level, but I doubt you want to be referred to that.

    As far as I know, that's the only method that's going to work for ALL spells ALL the time.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Arcane_Snowman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Arcane Thesis from Player's Handbook 2 allows you to choose a single spell, which has all metamagic effects costing 1 less for that spell, minimum 0.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Sstoopidtallkid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Texas...for now
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Either see if your DM will allow Easy Metamagic to reduce the cost to 0, or get a custom magic item. A Metamagic Rod with infinite uses of the Silent Spell feat would cost 5,000 GP(Lesser), 18,333.33 GP(Moderate), or 40,833.33 GP(Greater). None of those is unaffordable at the levels you would want it, though going above a +1 adjustment would be prohibitive in most cases. Either way, though, it depends on your DM.
    [/sarcasm]
    FAQ is not RAW!
    Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
    Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
    I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Keld Denar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Practical Metamagic should work, but I don't recall the source. Basically, you pick a MM Feat you have and it reduces it by 1. Thus, a +1 would be a +0 MM. 2 feats and all your spells are silenced all day long.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fax Celestis View Post
    AILHAY THULUCAY! AILHAY THULUCAY! AILHAY THULUCAY!
    _________________________________
    A beholder’s favorite foods include small live mammals, exotic mushrooms and other fungi, gnomes, beef, pork, colorful leafy vegetables, leaves, flower petals, insects, and birds.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RTGoodman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    If you've got a particular race in mind already it won't work, but there's a race in Manual of the Planes (I believe) called the Buomman that have a racial vow of silence. One of their racial feats, IIRC, lets you effectively cast without any Verbal components, which is basically like Silent Spell for all spells for free.

    EDIT: Practical Metamagic is from Races of the Dragon, assuming Google isn't lying to me.
    Last edited by RTGoodman; 2009-03-16 at 05:06 PM.
    The Playgrounder Formerly Known as rtg0922

    Homebrew:
    "Themes of Ansalon" - A 4E Dragonlance Supplement
    Homebrew Compendium

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Surgebinder in the Playground Moderator
     
    Douglas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Mountain View, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Practical Metamagic has the same minimum 1 as most other unlimited use reductions, though.

    Without homebrew, what you want is not possible until epic. You can get it on one spell with Arcane Thesis, but everything else either has an alternative cost that limits uses per day, has a minimum of 1 spell slot level, or is epic. You could play a psion instead - psionic powers have no verbal or somatic components - but that may not fit what you want.
    Last edited by Douglas; 2009-03-16 at 05:51 PM.
    Like 4X (aka Civilization-like) gaming? Know programming? Interested in game development? Take a look.

    Avatar by Ceika.

    Archives:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Saberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)
    Isstinen Tonche for ECL 74 playtesting.
    Team Solars: Powergaming beyond your wildest imagining, without infinite loops or epic. Yes, the DM asked for it.
    Arcane Swordsage: Making it actually work (homebrew)

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    I wish I knew...
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    I thought Practical Metamagic also had a limit of +1. If not, this is the answer to my problem, thanks!
    Quote Originally Posted by The Underlord View Post
    All hail great Shneekeythulhu! Ia Ia Shneeky fthagn
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quite possibly, the best rebuttal I have ever witnessed.
    Joker Bard - the DM's solution to the Batman Wizard.
    Takahashi no Onisan - The scariest Samurai alive
    Incarnum and YOU: a reference guide
    Soulmelds, by class and slot: Another Incarnum reference
    Multiclassing for Newbies: A reference guide for the rest of us

    My homebrew world in progress: Falcora

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AmberVael's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Quote Originally Posted by ShneekeyTheLost View Post
    I thought Practical Metamagic also had a limit of +1.
    It does, just like pretty much everything else you're going to find.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Halfling in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2009

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    If you could, try talking with your DM about the Meta-Magic variants in Unearthed Arcana. It has 2 options, both include prepared and spontaneous characters. Its a very nice feature, and makes metamagic more enticing. Before I never used much metamagic, only through Rods. Metamagic is just too expensive most of the time. Plus, since I play prepared casters, theres nothing more frustrating than preparing a metamagic'd spell only to find out its not the one you need, etc. Ugh. The UA variant for metamagic rocks, and is balanced in my opinion, which gives players a more desireable approach to using metamagic without all the drawbacks, making it more applicable in actual gameplay.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Gloucester, England
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Trying to reduce Metamagic cost

    Hi

    Try a Prestige Class. Ultimate Magus is quite good.

    If you took Sudden Silent as your MM feat, you can use your Wiz cantrips (0 lvl spells), to 'sudden' silent your spont class spells. (There is a limit/day and max level of spells you can 'empower' this way).

    Example:

    Beguiler 2/Wiz 3/Ult Magus 10

    1) Beguiler. (Armoured Mage, Trapfinder). SF Enchants
    2) Beguiler. (Cloaked Casting - +1DC, Surprise Casting)
    3) Wizard. (Scribe Scroll, Familiar), Sudden Silent
    4) Wizard.
    5) Wizard.
    6) Ult Magus. (Arcane Spellpower +1), +1 LA Beguiler, Unsettling Enchantment
    7) Ult Magus. (Expanded spell know - 1st lvl) +1LA Beguiler & Wiz
    8) Ult Magus. (Augmented Casting), +1LA Beguiler/Wiz
    9) Ult Magus. (Arcane Spellpower +2, Expanded spell know - 2nd Lvl), +1LA Beguiler, Pract Spellcaster Beguiler
    10) Ult Magus. (Bonus Metamagic Feat), +1LA Beguiler/Wiz
    11) Ult Magus. (Expanded spell know 3rd Lvl)
    12) Ult Magus. (Arcane Spellpower +3), +1LA Beguiler, Gtr SF Enchants
    13) Ult Magus. (Expanded spell know 4th Lvl), +1LA Beguiler/Wiz
    14) Ult Magus. (Bonus MM Feat), +1LA Beguiler/Wiz
    15) Ult Magus.(Arcane spell power +4, Expanded spell know 5th Lvl), +1LA Beguiler/Wiz, Pract Spellcaster Wiz

    Spells as Beguiler 12, Wiz 10.
    Beguiler CL 19
    Wizard CL 19

    Use spells from one class to power up metamagic feats on the other. Costs spell of the value of increase in spell level. Eg. Empower requires 2nd lvl spell, Sudden memtamagic requires cantrips.

    Enjoy
    Paul H
    PS you could always just buy a Metamagic Rod Silent Spell.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •