Support the GITP forums on Patreon
Help support GITP's forums (and ongoing server maintenance) via Patreon
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Aug 2017

    Default Regarding Thread Necromancy Rules - A suggestion

    I just noticed a 'handbook' style thread in the 3.5e subforum got locked for thread necromancy, and it got me thinking. (The one I noticed was the 'Warlockopedia' thread)


    These handbook threads should really be exempt from the thread necro rules.

    They represent an ongoing crowdsourced effort of brainstorming ideas and organizing information on a particular topic in a game (such as a class or subsystem in a game), and as such, it's not in the site's best interest, or the userbase's best interest, for these threads to get locked and force us to start a new thread on the topic. All that does is further fragment the information and make it much, much harder for users to find and sort through topics like these. Wouldn't it be much better to exempt 'handbook' style threads from the rule, so that they can be an ongoing resource for the gaming community, centralizing the compilation of the information, and encouraging continued submission of ideas or thoughts?


    In short: Please consider this my official request to change the site rules to make handbook threads in the gaming subforums exempt from thread necromancy rules.
    "I want tools to use in the game, not a blank check to do what I want. I can already do what I want." -Rich Burlew, author of OoTS, and founder/owner of this very website you're reading this text on.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    MonkGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2017

    Default Re: Regarding Thread Necromancy Rules - A suggestion

    I concur. There are a number of quality handbooks that are continually being updated. The OP said it better than I can, but these are valuable resources. It is better to let them be updated than have multiple handbook threads for the same thing because a new "chapter" was created a couple months later.
    3.5 Cast - A GitP member made, third edition podcast
    D&D 3.5 Discord Chat, Come one come all
    The Master Specialist Handbook
    Truly Complete List of 3.5e Base Classes
    Spoiler: quotes
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Venger View Post
    are you asking us to do research into a setting you wrote yourself?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashtagon View Post
    DMG 3.5e page 41:
    "If a player behaves in a way you don't want them to behave, talk to them about it. If they continue, stop playing with them. "
    By RAW, you have to stop playing with the guy.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Grey_Wolf_c's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2007

    Default Re: Regarding Thread Necromancy Rules - A suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by Crichton View Post
    In short: Please consider this my official request to change the site rules to make handbook threads in the gaming subforums exempt from thread necromancy rules.
    Aren't they already exempt? The OP can resurrect such threads without permission:
    Quote Originally Posted by Forum Rules
    The original poster of a creation in Homebrew (and only that poster) may revive a creation beyond the 45 day threshold without prior Moderator approval.
    But if the OP is not interested, or gone, then it is best to create a new thread, because otherwise the information is still going to be fragmented: any changes will not be reflected in the OP, but instead throughout the thread. Better to start over with OP editing capabilities. And as always, you can just request permission to resurrect a thread - the mods are more than happy to allow it when warranted. An ounce of prevention and all that.

    ETA: I've just been informed that we are talking about a different subforum from homebrew - i.e. it is not so much changing the rules as much as extending the homebrew exception to handbook threads?

    Grey Wolf
    Last edited by Grey_Wolf_c; 2020-05-05 at 10:23 AM.
    Interested in MitD? Join us in MitD's thread.
    There is a world of imagination
    Deep in the corners of your mind
    Where reality is an intruder
    And myth and legend thrive
    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    But really, the important lesson here is this: Rather than making assumptions that don't fit with the text and then complaining about the text being wrong, why not just choose different assumptions that DO fit with the text?
    Ceterum autem censeo Hilgya malefica est

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Sheriff in the Playground Administrator
     
    Roland St. Jude's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Regarding Thread Necromancy Rules - A suggestion

    Sheriff: This has been asked and answered multiple times, including less than a month ago. This is a discussion forum, not a repository. If there's an active discussion taking place, the thread will remain active. If the discussion has died off and you want to revive it, PM a moderator for the relevant section.

    Quote Originally Posted by Roland St. Jude View Post
    Sheriff: Handbooks have the same 45-day limit as other threads.
    From the last thread discussing this...
    Quote Originally Posted by Roland St. Jude View Post
    Sheriff: No general exception exists beyond that stated in the Forum Rules. Any thread is eligible for an exception, you just need to PM a mod and explain why it's necessary. They'll decide on an individual basis.
    Forum Rules

    Roland in the Dark by Djinn in Tonic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •