Results 91 to 120 of 3313
Thread: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
-
2009-06-06, 12:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
My character is completely ready with the flaws/trait and the 2 feats added.
So, anyone wanna fight our pair? :P
-
2009-06-06, 02:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Jolly Old England
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
I'm ready to fight when any other pair is.
-
2009-06-06, 03:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
I'd actually be willing to take a 2 on 1.
-
2009-06-06, 03:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Believe me, you'd not want us
-
2009-06-06, 03:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-06-06, 03:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
I'll go on and bet you won't even get to act...
-
2009-06-06, 03:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-06-06, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
how many buff rounds do you want?
(and what arena would you want?)Last edited by Eloel; 2009-06-06 at 03:15 PM.
-
2009-06-06, 03:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Zero buff rounds, just all day buffs. Start out of LoS with each other, so that whoever detects the others first gets a surprise round. If the person that detects first manages to avoid detection, they will of course have buff rounds for as long as they can avoid detection.
Sound fair?
-
2009-06-06, 03:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
A single buff round sounds more fair? :P
-
2009-06-06, 03:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-06-06, 03:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Are we using GitP as our medium for battling?
-
2009-06-06, 03:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-06-06, 03:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Sounds fair. I'm also a MW'er.
-
2009-06-06, 03:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Jolly Old England
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
If it's any consolation, you may not die. If I feel like it.
-
2009-06-06, 03:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
-
2009-06-06, 03:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Oh, I thought you had the sheet and we were going to do it now...
If this'll be official, obviously Tide will DM. If not, we can ask him to :)
-
2009-06-06, 03:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
No, just a plan. I don't actually have 13th level characters just lying around :P
I just need to actually STAT the character. That's all. Just gimme a day or so. I work in an hour, but only have a four hour shift so can make the sheet on MW after that. For reference, my handle there is "ubernoob".
-
2009-06-06, 03:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Jolly Old England
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
I'd rather this not be an official fight. I don't mean to sound cocky, or overconfident or anything, but i'd rather get xp for 2 people than 1 in the actual Test of Spite. I'm not saying we will just plain win, but on the pretty good chance we do, i'd like to get my money's worth. Tide might DM it for us anyway though.
-
2009-06-06, 04:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
-
2009-06-06, 04:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
We need a list of teams. Everyone PM me your teams, or if you are going solo, and I'll compile one.
--------------
List:
Munchlord and Eurus
Pharaoh-Boy and wykydtron
Lord Garath and Djinn-in-Tonic
Starbuck_II versus Colin
ozgun92 + melamotoLast edited by Pharaoh's Fist; 2009-06-07 at 07:44 PM.
-
2009-06-06, 04:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
I'll be tagging in with Archer, he brought me over from MythWeavers.
Last edited by Vader; 2009-06-06 at 05:06 PM.
-
2009-06-06, 07:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Gender
-
2009-06-06, 07:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Enterprise, Alabama
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Pharaoh's Fist': For your List-
I am solo versus Colin in first fight.
-
2009-06-06, 09:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
It is noted. When is good for you, Star Buck?
Lagren: I took Livers Need Not Apply, only reflavoured.
DocRoc: to?
Lagren: So whenever Harry wisecracks, he regains HP.
-
2009-06-06, 09:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Enterprise, Alabama
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Pretty much any afternoon unless I have something scheduled (like buying a father's day or dog's birthday gift or somethingk, still need to get around to doing that).
So Noon-till 8 probably. Oh except Sunday: keep it holy and all.
Not doing much this week but playing video games(Almost finished: Force Unleashed and Mass Effect).
-
2009-06-06, 10:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Darn, I was hoping to do it tomorrow.
Lagren: I took Livers Need Not Apply, only reflavoured.
DocRoc: to?
Lagren: So whenever Harry wisecracks, he regains HP.
-
2009-06-06, 11:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- PST (GMT -8)
- Gender
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
We are
ozgun92 + melamoto
Add us to the list :)
-
2009-06-07, 12:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
-
2009-06-07, 01:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
Re: Test of Spite [D&D 3.5]
Okay, two things.
1) Mindblank, what does CL check stuff even mean? Does that only apply to Divination? Or does Mindblank no longer protect against Dominate Person all the time?
2) "All prepared casters start with at minimum one spell scribed per level." What does that mean? Does it mean we start with spells in our book? Does it mean we have to have a scroll for every level that we can cast? Do we get those scrolls for free? Or do we have to pay XP and WBL for them? Does that rule make all Wizards automatically level 12 characters?
What about if you are a prepared caster who doesn't have scribe scroll and so can't scribe a scroll, like Druid/Cleric/Wizard who traded out for improved Init?
3) You school fixes are all terrible and detrimental to the game. Thank goodness this is a PvP thing, so I can just build a non specialist and ignore them. But they are all still bad. enchantment and evocation actually have good things that people give up when they specialize elsewhere, to make it so that for a piddly extra spell at each level they have to give up huge swaths like that? And you do know they give up two schools?
Seriously, I have no idea why you hate specialization so much. Also, Necromancy is really really easy to give up, you should combine it with Evocation so that no one at all can ban two schools without sucking.