New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Mystic Muse's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2009

    Default what's better for a paladin?

    should I go for a strength increase or a charisma increase? (through items.)

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Orc in the Playground
     
    RogueGirl

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: what's better for a paladin?

    Charisma. Strength is handy and shouldn't be a total dump stat, but since pretty much all of a paladin's major abilities-- save boosts, lay on hands, etc-- are based on CHA, that's the one you want to raise.
    "Experience is a good thing. You should hit it." - Lathandar to his Paladin, in response to her prayers for advice on what to do about a Holy Liberator

    "Strahd turns into mist." - DM
    "And I turn into a hepa filter." - Lumieras

    Quote of the Week:
    "If you go down south, you'll hear of Arthur Bartholomew Bartholomew, a man who changed a town." - Foster
    "Into dust?" - Owen

    Characters: Kalinda Gray, Lawful Good Thief

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: what's better for a paladin?

    As a better explanation:

    Strength aids you in your melee attack and damage rolls, plus with the weight. Being the Paladin a melee character, usually Strength should be pretty high.

    Charisma, on the other hand, enhances your attack bonus with your Smite Evil, the bonus to saves from Divine Grace, and the amount of healing with Lay on Hands.

    Thus, that depends on how much you intend to be as a Paladin. If you're going for a dip in Paladin, Charisma is much better than Strength, depending on what is the kind of dip you want. If you want to be a full-fledged Paladin, then BOTH are important to raise. Usually, you'll want Charisma to be increased by items most of the time, since those are semi-permanent (so as long as they aren't suppressed or destroyed, they work fine), while Strength is best left for buffing spells (such as Bull's Strength and similar spells).
    Retooler of D&D 3.5 (and 5e/Next) content. See here for more.
    Now with a comprehensive guide for 3.5 Paladin players porting to Pathfinder. Also available for 5th Edition
    On Lawful Good:
    Quote Originally Posted by firebrandtoluc View Post
    My friend is currently playing a paladin. It's way outside his normal zone. I told him to try to channel Santa Claus, Mr. Rogers, and Kermit the Frog. Until someone refuses to try to get off the naughty list. Then become Optimus Prime.
    T.G. Oskar profile by Specter.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: what's better for a paladin?

    Strength. Charisma boosts your saves, attack bonus on smites and lay on hands healing. Strength boosts your attack bonus all the time and your damage too.

    Saves: I admit this one is quite handy. Depends on what kind of monsters you fight. But the cost of boosting saves with items is lower than the cost of boosting strength. So I'd say it becomes more of a concern after you have that +5 cloak of resistance. You could pay more for a +6 cloak of charisma, but then your saves will actually be the same or lower than if you made charisma a secondary stat.

    Attack bonus on smites: Yeah, like I said, strength gives just as much and it applies all the time, not just smites.

    Lay on hands healing: Your typical cure spell does about 1d8 + 2 per 2 cleric levels, or 6.5 / 2 = 3.25 average per level. But heal does 10 points per level, and it's questionable whether or not pre-heal cure spells are worth the combat round. Lay on hands might give you 5-7 per level with a good cha, and lay on hands works only once. Or if you subdivide its use it becomes even less likely to be worth the round, and between combat healing could be replaced by a cheap wand of cure light wounds. So basically once per day you get to be a so-so cleric from a rather large investment in cha. Are you sure you wouldn't do more to protect your allies by reducing the incoming damage by killing something instead?

    So I'd do str, cha then con if you're worried about saves. Or even str, con then cha if you aren't so much. Depends on the campaign. Either way I'd get only enough dex and wis. Probably 12-13 minimum on each, since you can boost wis later with a periapt if you really need to (or an ioun stone if you don't have the item slot).

    EDIT: Oh ya, cha also gives more turn attempts. But how many turn attempts per day do you need for the few undead that are weak enough to be turned by a paladin?
    Last edited by ericgrau; 2009-07-27 at 01:19 PM.
    So you never have to interrupt a game to look up a rule again:
    My 3.5e Rules Cheat Sheets: Normal, With Consolidated Skill System
    TOGC's 3.5e Spell/etc Cards: rpgnow / drivethru rpg
    Utilities: Magic Item Shop Generator (Req. MS Excel), Balanced Low Magic Item System
    Printable Cardstock Dungeon Tiles and other terrain stuff (100 MB)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •