New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 38
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2008

    Default 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Sadly, its for DDI people only right now.

    Found here.

    Something to note, they specifically state in the article that Githyanki will not be appearing as a PC race in the PHB3.
    Spoiler
    Show
    James Wyatt: Contrary to some message-board claims, the githyanki are not appearing in Playerís Handbook 3. Why not, you ask?
    The githzeraiís evil kin are great villains, and we want to be careful about how often we turn villain races into player character options. Making the drow a playable race spent a lot of that currency, and we donít want to overdo it.

    Mike Mearls: While sometimes itís fun to play against stereotypes, we donít want every villainous race to go the way of the drow.


    I'm not really sure how I feel about that.
    Last edited by Asbestos; 2009-08-04 at 04:40 PM.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2007

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Asbestos View Post
    Contrary to some message-board claims, the githyanki are not appearing in Playerís Handbook 3. Why not, you ask?
    The githzeraiís evil kin are great villains, and we want to be careful about how often we turn villain races into player character options. Making the drow a playable race spent a lot of that currency, and we donít want to overdo it.

    While sometimes itís fun to play against stereotypes, we donít want every villainous race to go the way of the drow.
    I applaud their decision. It's gotten to the point where the drow are a joke.
    Last edited by FoE; 2009-08-04 at 05:05 PM.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Limos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2008

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    I'm actually really glad I finally broke down and got a subscription. There is a lot of good stuff in there.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    GnomeWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Githzerai? Sweet. They are one of the reasons I'm interested in picking up the PHB3 and.....

    Oh, wait. That's right. Wizards doesn't care if I'm interested, because I don't give them $10 a month. Well, nevermind then.


    As a side note, no Githyanki? They don't want them to "go the way of the drow"? I hate to break it to Wizards, but there have been Drow PCs since at least 2nd edition, due in no small part to the success of one particular popular Forgotten Realms author. Besides, once you publish the Githyanki racial stats and feats, you've basically given them the same "player character options" every other race has.

    And the only two settings I could see Githyanki set in are Planescape and Spelljammer. Hmm...

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RTGoodman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Most important part of the article? We get the name for a new class - the Seeker. (It says at the bottom that githzerai tend toward the Ranger, Monk, and Seeker classes.)

    Otherwise, it's a pretty cool class, but not one I'd probably play for the most part. They'd make great Rangers with their Dex/Wis bonuses, racial initiative bonus, ability to shift 3 when you use a second wind (pretty great with dwarven armor), and defense bonuses. Oh, and save bonuses against things that can really screw with a mobile striker (daze, dominate, etc.).
    The Playgrounder Formerly Known as rtg0922

    Homebrew:
    ē "Themes of Ansalon" - A 4E Dragonlance Supplement
    ē Homebrew Compendium

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2008

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by erikun View Post
    Githzerai? Sweet. They are one of the reasons I'm interested in picking up the PHB3 and.....

    Oh, wait. That's right. Wizards doesn't care if I'm interested, because I don't give them $10 a month. Well, nevermind then.
    They do care and hope you still care when the PHB3 comes out. They just hope you care that extra bit to pay that 10 dollars a month to play the full blown Zerth before the PHB3 comes out.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Xallace's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Cocoon

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by rtg0922 View Post
    Most important part of the article? We get the name for a new class - the Seeker. (It says at the bottom that githzerai tend toward the Ranger, Monk, and Seeker classes.)
    Where? I see Avenger.
    Extended Homebrew Signature

    Spoiler
    Show
    Coplantor's Official Second-In-Command 2.0. It's alot like being Will Riker, but still with less alien women and also pirates.

    Quote Originally Posted by Avatars
    "Epic Abjurer" avatar by the astounding Fayt!
    "The-Fantastic-Protectimaton-MK-VIII" avatar by the wondrous KingGolem!
    "You-Know-You-Want-It" Paladin MD avatar by the mighty thelizard!
    "Eat-Steel-Vile-Flu" Paladin MD avatar by the sexier-than-I Dr. Bath!

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    I like that they've gone to the effort of adding 'directors commentary' so we get an idea of what they're thinking about with previewed matirial.

    It was part of what I enjoyed from the old 4th ed preview books, whatever they were called.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RTGoodman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Xallace View Post
    Where? I see Avenger.
    Sorry, it was in the CharBuilder, not the actual article. If you don't see it there, it might have been edited/removed in the second update today (that fixed some bug).



    So... Psionic Defender (maybe replacement for Psychic Warrior)? Or some new Divine or Primal class? Hmm...
    The Playgrounder Formerly Known as rtg0922

    Homebrew:
    ē "Themes of Ansalon" - A 4E Dragonlance Supplement
    ē Homebrew Compendium

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Gralamin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by rtg0922 View Post
    Sorry, it was in the CharBuilder, not the actual article. If you don't see it there, it might have been edited/removed in the second update today (that fixed some bug).



    So... Psionic Defender (maybe replacement for Psychic Warrior)? Or some new Divine or Primal class? Hmm...
    Nice, I missed that since I've been busy all day rebuilding my RAID array.

    Seeker sounds like a Divine Class to me, the type Ioun would employ to get artifacts and such.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RTGoodman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Gralamin View Post
    Seeker sounds like a Divine Class to me, the type Ioun would employ to get artifacts and such.
    I could see that. I was thinking Psionic might fit if the fluff is about seeking power within yourself, but I could see a Seeker being someone who seeks divinity of some sort or something like that.
    The Playgrounder Formerly Known as rtg0922

    Homebrew:
    ē "Themes of Ansalon" - A 4E Dragonlance Supplement
    ē Homebrew Compendium

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    WotC pushed the whole "monstrous races as PC" thing on players the hardest with 3E. Even TSR was careful about statting out the more monstrous races. TSR completely removed the half-orc from core 2E because they didn't want players to be using monstrous races and it wasn't until 5 years later that TSR allowed you to play as the more civilized of monster races and even then they said that you likely played as an outcast or were raised among human society much like Gygax's original write up of the drow as player character's.

    The githyanki are an ordered, evil, and militant race. It's plausible that a lone deserter could leave the planes to travel the prime but it's highly unlikely and given 4E's points-of-light system, any creepy monster wandering around will likely get stones thrown at him.

    4E presents you with racial statistics for civilized monsters so DM's can easily adjust those for players. "Not supporting a race" simply means they won't be given race specific feats and paragon/epic options which is perfectly fine with me.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Banned
     
    SwashbucklerGuy

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Flawse Fell, Geordieland

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by jmbrown View Post
    TSR was careful about statting out the more monstrous races. TSR completely removed the half-orc from core 2E because they didn't want players to be using monstrous races and it wasn't until 5 years later that TSR allowed you to play as the more civilized of monster races and even then they said that you likely played as an outcast or were raised among human society much like Gygax's original write up of the drow as player character's.
    Who is this person who knows not BECMI D&D?

    BECMI had monster race rules from about the Companion set onwards. Just because it was the 800lb gorilla of the company's output (and the primary focus of the idiotic 'no demons, no evil' policy) AD&D != TSR.

    PC sphinxes, Nagpas, centaurs, Manscorpions, Arenaeas(sp?), winged minotaurs, fey folk, young dragon, etc.: all were supported as PCs in BD&D. Heck, Shadow Elves (like Drow, only with less fanboi fap) got their own sourcebook IIRC.

    /derailment

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    I don't know what they're holding up. If a GM wants to allow a Githyanki player character, he will do that, houseruling some things. That's not like they're going to stop it. I was never a fan of differentiating between player and monster races, and was always allowing my players to play any sentient race they want and have at least basic humanoid body.

    However, Githzerai seem interesting anyway, as all the Gith guys are usually.

  15. - Top - End - #15

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Asbestos View Post
    Mike Mearls: While sometimes itís fun to play against stereotypes, we donít want every villainous race to go the way of the drow.
    And they've all ready stepped that direction with the Drow as-is, proving they don't care about the Drow being villains any more.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Kaiyanwang's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Asbestos View Post
    Mike Mearls: While sometimes itís fun to play against stereotypes, we donít want every villainous race to go the way of the drow.
    Translation: since both Gith classes are popular, and are inter-dependent fluff-wise, leads to more profits split them in two different books.
    Warning: my time zone and internet acces may lead to strange/late post answers.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurald Galain View Post
    The rogue isn't really using charisma in melee, the rogue is applying Ability Score #6 to his Type-One attacks.
    Quote Originally Posted by ken-do-nim View Post
    DMing is how you turn D&D from a game into a hobby.
    Quote Originally Posted by Maroon View Post
    Players can see a story where there isn't one.
    Quote Originally Posted by Eldariel View Post
    For 4.0? I expect them to whine to the DM until he makes the big bad boogeyman go away.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Tempest Fennac's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Midlands, UK.

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    I never liked the idea of "villanous" races (my stance is that it always results in races coming across as 1-dimentional while limiting player choices needlessly if the DM insists on having the listed alignments affecting how races are seen in their games).
    "It doesn't matter what you think I'm supposed to be, 'cause I myself know all too well." Line from "King of My World" by Saliva.
    Good itP 2009 winner,Cleric itP Winner.
    Taking Reiki requests. PM me for details.
    Spoiler
    Show


  18. - Top - End - #18
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    NPCMook's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Personally there are only two races I'd like to see get a write-up, Centaurs, and Kobolds.

    I don't know why, I just seem to enjoy those two races the most.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Kaiyanwang's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Tempest Fennac View Post
    I never liked the idea of "villanous" races (my stance is that it always results in races coming across as 1-dimentional while limiting player choices needlessly if the DM insists on having the listed alignments affecting how races are seen in their games).
    See, if a race is playable or not playable depends from the setting. In one setting the orc is playable, because:

    - in that setting orcs are neutral or CN free spirits

    - the campaign is evil

    - the story allows a good orc raised among uman to free his race from the curse of blood

    In another settin is not because:

    - +4 strenght? it's OP! (Joking, just an example)

    - orcs are totally evil in a good campaing, a la LoTR

    - they must remind, setting-wise, distant and mysterious

    See? the last thing could fit well with elves. In a nother setting, elves are "unplayable".

    If a race is popular, make rule for it. It's up to the DM decide case by case if is playable or not.

    Couldn't I bulid a campaign about Gith pirates?
    Last edited by Kaiyanwang; 2009-08-05 at 09:28 AM.
    Warning: my time zone and internet acces may lead to strange/late post answers.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurald Galain View Post
    The rogue isn't really using charisma in melee, the rogue is applying Ability Score #6 to his Type-One attacks.
    Quote Originally Posted by ken-do-nim View Post
    DMing is how you turn D&D from a game into a hobby.
    Quote Originally Posted by Maroon View Post
    Players can see a story where there isn't one.
    Quote Originally Posted by Eldariel View Post
    For 4.0? I expect them to whine to the DM until he makes the big bad boogeyman go away.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2007

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Thrax View Post
    I don't know what they're holding up. If a GM wants to allow a Githyanki player character, he will do that, houseruling some things. That's not like they're going to stop it.
    Yes, but there's a difference between houseruling and "official support," so to speak. People are free to make up their own feats and, hell, their own classes if they want. But WotC isn't going to do the work for you.

    Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, for the reasons they pointed out.

    I read through the article. It's not bad, albeit a little light on fluff. But if you read the article on the githyanki city that they posted not too long ago, you get a more complete picture of the githzerai's history.

    I'd like to see a githzerai city soon.
    Last edited by FoE; 2009-08-05 at 10:43 AM.

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Griffon

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by jmbrown View Post
    The githyanki are an ordered, evil, and militant race. It's plausible that a lone deserter could leave the planes to travel the prime but it's highly unlikely and given 4E's points-of-light system, any creepy monster wandering around will likely get stones thrown at him.
    Can the average villager even tell the difference between a githzerai and a githyanki?

    What is the difference, anyway? I know they split off from the same thing due to ideological reasons.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Jothki View Post
    Can the average villager even tell the difference between a githzerai and a githyanki?

    What is the difference, anyway? I know they split off from the same thing due to ideological reasons.
    I can't even tell out of character. How the hell is a villager going to?

  23. - Top - End - #23

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by jmbrown View Post
    The githyanki are an ordered, evil, and militant race. It's plausible that a lone deserter could leave the planes to travel the prime but it's highly unlikely and given 4E's points-of-light system, any creepy monster wandering around will likely get stones thrown at him.
    I don't see how this stands when the Core setting includes the Dragonborn and Tiefling races as player character races. Compared to any traditional fantasy setting, these are monster races. Also, "any creepy monster wandering around will likely get stones thrown at him" doesn't stand when you read through the race descriptions in the 4e PHB. The greatest hint of any dislike is between the Dragonborn and the Tieflings, whose fallen empires were mortal enemies. And yet the PHB takes great pains to describe how a player of either race is not at all required due to this history to hold any kind of grudge or to think any less of a member of the other race.
    Quote Originally Posted by Thrax View Post
    I don't know what they're holding up. If a GM wants to allow a Githyanki player character, he will do that, houseruling some things. That's not like they're going to stop it.
    True, people can always house rule things they want to allow in their games. But this does set the bar for how WotC intend the game to be played. Just like the descriptions of the evil alignments make it clear that the players are supposed to be either unaligned or good, and the good and neutral gods are described in the PHB while the evil gods are reserved for the DMG.

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2007

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Jothki View Post
    What is the difference, anyway? I know they split off from the same thing due to ideological reasons.
    Shortly after the uprising led by Gith against their mindflayer masters, the race was split on how to guard themselves against further enslavement. The githyanki believed that conquest was the only way to safeguard their race, while the githzerai believed consolidation and defence were necessary to the survival of their species.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Yora's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Germany

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    One faction lived on the astral plane, the other on Limbo for probably many milennia. If this justifies making them two distinct races is debateable, but done since at least 3.0. Maybe even back in 2nd Ed. Planescape.
    We are not standing on the shoulders of giants, but on very tall tower of other dwarves.

    Spriggan's Den Heroic Fantasy Roleplaying

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Shadow_Elf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Muarzibet, Siraaj
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    But with no PC Githyanki, who will be our official core INT-CON race? The Infernal and Vestige-pact Warlocks, Staff Wizards, Battlesmith Artificers and Shielding and Ensnaring Swordmagi of the universe demand answers!
    My Homebrew
    Currently DMing: Heroes on a Sea of Swords - IC - OOC - OOC II - OOC III
    Many thanks to the very talented Kymme for making an Avatar of my incredibly-specific D&D character!

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    Dec 2008

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup



    ... I see no good reason for not making stereotypically "Evil" races playable without homebrew.

    Giving stats for goblin and hobgoblin characters in the MM1 seems a bit counterproductive to having anyone play the "good" races anyway.

    This reeks, i dunno of what though.

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Shadow_Elf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Muarzibet, Siraaj
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Dixieboy View Post
    =
    Giving stats for goblin and hobgoblin characters in the MM1 seems a bit counterproductive to having anyone play the "good" races anyway.
    I believe it says somewhere that the Character stat blocks in the back of the Monster Manual are meant for DM use in the making of NPCs, using the NPC creation rules in the DMG, rather than for use as PC races. So the inclusion of those statblocks is not counter-productive from their design goal of "Drizz't Clone Aversion", from a design standpoint. That PCs use information they designed for DM use is not a design problem.
    My Homebrew
    Currently DMing: Heroes on a Sea of Swords - IC - OOC - OOC II - OOC III
    Many thanks to the very talented Kymme for making an Avatar of my incredibly-specific D&D character!

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Goblin

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    York
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    Quote Originally Posted by Face Of Evil View Post
    Shortly after the uprising led by Gith against their mindflayer masters, the race was split on how to guard themselves against further enslavement. The githyanki believed that conquest was the only way to safeguard their race, while the githzerai believed consolidation and defence were necessary to the survival of their species.
    Through the teachings of Zerthimon, I have become stronger

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Default Re: 4e- Githzerai Full Race Writeup

    I don't see how this stands when the Core setting includes the Dragonborn and Tiefling races as player character races. Compared to any traditional fantasy setting, these are monster races. Also, "any creepy monster wandering around will likely get stones thrown at him" doesn't stand when you read through the race descriptions in the 4e PHB. The greatest hint of any dislike is between the Dragonborn and the Tieflings, whose fallen empires were mortal enemies. And yet the PHB takes great pains to describe how a player of either race is not at all required due to this history to hold any kind of grudge or to think any less of a member of the other race.
    Dragonborn and 4E tieflings are also creatures of the prime. The "villaineous" races are considered that for a reason. A gith is born and shaped on the powerfully aligned planes. His attitudes are inherent or powerfully swayed by his place of birth unlike prime creatures whose attitudes are influenced by their upbringing.

    There's always exceptions (Drizzt being one of them, the mind flayer prophet in Book of Exalted Deeds, a non-evil succubi, etc.) but these exceptions are super rare and are almost always described as outcasts. They're morally color-coded because their place of birth and/or civilization is morally color coded.

    A non-evil drow/goblin/githyanki/what have you is always an outcast and never accepted among their fellow creatures. There's nothing wrong with giving players the options but PC races get full write ups and are basically indoctrinated into D&D 4E canon. Every future product will fully support said race. The PC races are expected to be the norm and if they canonized the villaineous races they'd have to find a way to make them normal parts of the ingame universe and saying "Play the Githyanki if you want to be tyrannical, militant, extremely aggresive, and tainted by the chaotic planes..." goes against the "Epic Hero" style of D&D 4E.

    I like the idea of the monster blocks at the end of the monster manuals. They're designed for NPC's but they're on par with the PC races IMO.

    Through the teachings of Zerthimon, I have become stronger
    Endure. In enduring grow strong.
    Last edited by jmbrown; 2009-08-05 at 02:35 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •