Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
2009-09-05, 09:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
[D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
One of the things that used to irritate me about D6 was the amount of dice rolling involved in combat, which was all fine and dandy when things were small scale, but could slow combat down significantly when a dozen or so combatants were involved. In D&D you can roll 10 goblin attacks with 10 dice all at once, but the way that D6 works you have to roll every storm trooper attack separately, then roll all the damage separately.
I like rolling lots of D6, but not so much when it means that rolling all NPC activities takes up much more time than PC activities. I remember this was particularly obvious during a space port shoot out where there were multiple sides in addition to the PCs. Being a novice game master at the time I had elected to roll all the attacks as they occurred, and one player became so frustrated that he exclaimed "Why don't you just decide what happens with the guys not shooting at us?" He was right, of course.
So what about something like this? Instead of rolling damage and resistance, fixed totals are used corresponding to the total dice:
1d6 = 3
2d6 = 7
3d6 = 10
4d6 = 14
5d6 = 17
6d6 = 21
7d6 = 24
...and so on. To increase the variability, maybe ever 5 points over the target difficulty grants +1 damage. So, for example:
Storm Trooper
Blaster Rifle 4D
Strength 2D
Equipment: Blaster Rifle (5D), Storm Trooper Armour (1D)
Hero
Blaster Pistol 5D
Dodge 4D
Strength 3D
Equipment: Blaster Pistol (4D), Blast Vest (+1)
So, the hero has been caught out at medium range against three storm troopers, meaning they only need a "10" to hit him. Luckily, he has the initiative, so he burns a force point to double all his attributes and take three actions: 1) Dodge 2) Shoot 3) Shoot.
1) His Dodge is thus 6D, but he rolls low and gets 15.
2) The three Storm Troopers roll 4D to hit, turning up 20, 20 and 4.
3) The damage from their blaster rifles is thus 18 each, but the hero has 6D+1 resistance because of his force point and he turns up 25 and 19.
4) The hero takes two shots on 8D each, scoring 33 and 38, which translates to 18 and 19 damage.
5) The Storm Troopers resist on 3D scoring 7 and 17 (wild die) respectively.
6) The first Storm Trooper is incapacitated and the second stunned.
Still a lot of rolling, maybe fixed defences would be better?Last edited by Matthew; 2010-02-08 at 04:03 PM.
It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)
-
2009-09-06, 08:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Flawse Fell, Geordieland
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
Anything that reduces the amount of dice flying off the table during play has to be to the good.
Further simplification: perhaps only the active character, or only the PC, rolls. Passive/NPC characters (as you prefer) have flat DCs, or possibly roll a single wild die over a flat DC. So a 4d skill switches to a semi-floating DC of 10+1d.
I know it'll involve a little retro-fitting, and will reduce some of the delicious "string-of-1s" randomness of the d6 system, but it might help things to run a little quicker in complex situations.
The bonus damage for degrees of success rule is good. It's something a lot of other systems could use IMO. The Thunderous Papercut (roll well TH, then roll piddly damage) is the sort of mechanical b0rkage that should have died a long time ago.
-
2009-09-06, 11:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
I like a combination, actually... and rather like Boss Smiley's "Only PCs roll more than the wild die."
So, the example would go like this:
Storm Trooper
Blaster Rifle 4D
Strength 2D
Equipment: Blaster Rifle (5D), Storm Trooper Armour (1D)
Hero
Blaster Pistol 5D
Dodge 4D
Strength 3D
Equipment: Blaster Pistol (4D), Blast Vest (+1)
The Storm troopers would each roll 1D6+9 for their attack (3 for the regular dice, 1d6 for the wild die), with the d6 exploding. For damage, they'd do 1D6+12.
This slightly favors the heroes, since the average on 1d6 is actually 3.5, without utterly destroying the NPCs.The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2009-09-06, 12:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Grognardia
- Gender
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
What I usually do in my d6 games (or used to do since I haven't table-topped a d6 game in years) was to pre-prepare a large list of rolls. I'd have 50 or so listed from 2d to 10d. And then I'df just take them off the top, cross them off as I use them, and Bob's your uncle.
It did remove some of the fun of actually rolling dice, but in larger combats it streamlined matters immensely. I used to do the same thing with passive checks. Have the players roll a string of dice before the game starts and use them, one after the other, whenever I wanted them to roll for something but didn't want them to know I rolled it.
And, of course, important NPC's always got to actually roll. Because they're important.(Avatar by Cuthalion, who is great.)
-
2009-09-06, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
Aye, I like dice rolling, but there is definitely too much in D6 if you have more than handful of combatants.
Good idea. That would mean basically static defences, I would not bother with the wild die, but I might allow character points to be additional rolls. Basically it would mean that dodging would be useful depending on range:
Short = 5 = 2D+0 or more
Medium = 10 = 3D+1 or more
Long = 15 = 4D+2 or more
I agree.
Yeah, it is not so bad in very abstract combat systems, but D6 seems to tend towards the more specific. If static defences and static damage were used, I would be tempted to make it 1D per 5 above difficulty.
Interestingly, D6 Space offers a body point (that is to say, hit point) system with armour as damage reduction. That might be worth considering. To be honest, anybody hit by blaster fire should be incapacitated straight off the bat, with only character points being likely to prevent it. How many wounded Storm Troopers do we really see in Star Wars? They pretty much go down after every hit...
So typical damage from blaster fire is:
Pistol: 4D = 14
Rifle: 5D = 17
Storm Trooper armour reduces damage by 1D, and they usually have 2D or 3D strength, which might mean 7-10 Body Points. What if:
Reduced to 0 or less Body Points = Incapacitated
Reduced to less than 3 Body Points = Badly Wounded
Reduced to 3-6 Body Points = Lightly Wounded
Any other wounding hit is considered a stun.
Maybe a bit too Dungeons & Dragons, I dunno.
Try the example again...
The hero has been caught out at medium range against three storm troopers, meaning they only need a "10" to hit him. Luckily, he has the initiative, so he burns a force point to double all his attributes and take three actions: 1) Dodge 2) Shoot 3) Shoot.
1) His Dodge is thus 6D, which means 21.
2) The three Storm Troopers roll 4D to hit, turning up 20, 20 and 4.
3) No hits on our hero.
4) The hero takes two shots on 8D each, scoring 33 and 38.
5) This translates to 5D+1 and 5D+2 damage, turning up as 23 and 26.
6) The Storm Troopers have 10 Body Points and 4 Armour.
7) Both go down in a hail of blaster fire.
1) His Dodge is 6D (17+1D), which turns up 27 (wild die)
2) The three Storm troopers roll 4D to hit (10+1D), rolling 25 (wild die twice!), 12 and 11.
3) No hits on our hero.
4) The hero takes two shots on 8D each (24+1D), which turn up 27 and 28.
5) Both shots were 15 over required number, so +1D. the hero rolls 5D damage (14+1D) and scores 18 and 19.
6) The Storm Troopers have 10 Body Points and 4 Armour.
7) Both go down in a hail of blaster fire.
Aye; I think it doesn't really matter too much whether you use "3" or "3.5" in the figuring, but the idea of just rolling the wild die is very appealing.Last edited by Matthew; 2009-09-06 at 12:22 PM.
It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)
-
2009-09-06, 01:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Vancouver WA
- Gender
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
Wow been awhile since I've seen any mention of Star Wars West end.
I think just having the PC's and actions directly involving the PC's rolled, does a fine job of cutting down on clutter. Any NPC vs NPC action is just story/cinematography based.
Taking the randomness out of the NPC's rolling could be seen as either gimping them (if they need to have a lucky roll in a situation) or as an advantage. (hey these guys never roll that bad? what gives?)
I've had characters saved when a particular STR roll to resist damage botched by having the enemy botch the damage roll just as much.
From doing a lot of d6 - d20 conversions generally for every 1D of a stat you can pretty much count it as 3-4 points, it works out pretty well, but you have to eyeball it a bit.
Just my 2 cents.Battle Aura by Tavin Mars
SpoilerI Will Not Stand By
I Will Not Give Up
I Will Let My Presence Be Felt
To The Utmost of My Ability
Regardless Of The Battle
I Shall Fight
-
2009-09-06, 02:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
I think that I would miss the visceral action of rolling the die, the aesthetic of pre-prepared dice rolls does not appeal to me.
You might be interested in this thread: West End Games Releases D6 Core Rules as Free PDFs (though, to be honest, when I went to their website and forums I found no such news, which makes me wonder...)
Sure, but even so large battles become a pain to run, say with six PCs and twenty NPCs.
I agree, I think the rules are better applied uniformly, rather than by PC/NPC. Decreasing the randomness, though, is I think a laudable goal. I really like the idea of only rolling the wild die, as things remain quite random, but become a good deal easier to predict.
Aye, me too, but... I think those occasions are rather unsatisfying, especially when you are taking about four batches of rolls just to determine the results of one attack.
Yeah, the 3-4 point deal does seem pretty reasonable.
Much appreciated!It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)
-
2009-09-06, 08:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2009-09-07, 06:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Kanagawa, Japan
- Gender
Re: [D6 Star Wars] Variable Damage versus Fixed Damage
It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.
– Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)