Results 1 to 30 of 36
-
2009-09-07, 11:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- California
- Gender
-
2009-09-07, 11:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Probably, yeah. Unfortunately, it isn't.
-
2009-09-07, 11:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Definitely. And it can be found as one in the Age of Mortals Dragonlance book, the last (that I know of) 1st party dragonlance book.
Lagren: I took Livers Need Not Apply, only reflavoured.
DocRoc: to?
Lagren: So whenever Harry wisecracks, he regains HP.
-
2009-09-07, 12:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Malsheem, Nessus
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
In Dragonlance: Age of Mortals, there's a War Mage (note the space) PrC. In 5 levels, it grants two bonus metamagic feats, the ability to add +3 damage per die to all damaging spells, and the ability to grant 2 or 3 allies a +10 morale bonus to AC. Not only would warmage be better as a PrC, it already is better.
EDIT: Ninja'd.Last edited by PairO'Dice Lost; 2009-09-07 at 12:01 PM.
-
2009-09-07, 12:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
It depends on the sort of game you're running. Personally, I think the wizard would be better off as a warmage, but some people are really attached to having casters being more powerful than everyone, no matter what.
-
2009-09-07, 12:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Redwood Curtain
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
I have to ask....would a straight class Warmage be able to qualify for War Mage? And would the Warmage Edge stack with the other extra dice? Hmm...
-
2009-09-07, 12:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Romancing the Windy City
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
And in only five posts, the debate turns to "Wizards are Overpowered." Nice and passive-aggressive too.
Anyway, the Warmage as a PrC isn't an awful idea - depending on what you include - as it partially makes up for the lost schools of an Evocation specialist or enhances the capabilities of a generalist who likes dealing damage. At present, Warmage is an NPC class at worst and at best a decent choice for an Ultimate Magus.Yotsubatar by Dr. Bath
-
2009-09-07, 12:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Well, if there were more than just the trio of Warmage, Dread Necromancer and Beguiler, you could replace specialist wizards pretty well. The problem is that they are generally weaker than wizards, so as long as the wizard class still exists the better choice is a specialist wizard. Beguilers are the only one that actually does what he's supposed to as well as a wizard could, plus other goodies.
Last edited by FMArthur; 2009-09-07 at 12:33 PM.
- Chameleon Base Class [3.5]/[PF]: A versatile, morphic class that mimics one basic party role (warrior, caster, sneak, etc) at a time. If you find yourself getting bored of any class you play too long, the Chameleon is for you!
- Warlock Power Sources [3.5]: Making Hellfire Warlock part of the base class and providing other similar options for Warlocks whose powers don't come from devils.
-
2009-09-07, 01:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Texas...for now
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
I'd put DN on the same power level as Beguiler. Yes, it's weaker than a Wizard, but IMHO that's a good thing.
And Arguskos made a couple homebrew specialists along those lines to replace the Wizard completely. Pretty good stuff.[/sarcasm]
FAQ is not RAW!Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.
-
2009-09-07, 04:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Why be a PrC? It's an evocation specialized wizard who can't do anything else.
They're one of the worst classes I've ever seen, because the moment you're not blasting a bad guy, you're completely and utterly useless.
Even more useless than a fighter with no skill class levels.
Also, on beguilers.
I'm playing one in a 3rd level game.
We need to stop fighting zombies and spiders! Rawr!Last edited by Iorthol; 2009-09-07 at 04:07 PM.
-
2009-09-07, 04:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Quit ripping on warmages. They're not horrible. They get cloudkill. They get Black Tentacles. They're entirely decent.
-
2009-09-07, 04:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2009-09-07, 05:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
1. Thanks for the prop there Sstoopidtallkid.
2. I personally think that the Warmage is somewhat underpowered, since it doesn't have the better new blaster spells, such as Radiant Assault, Darkbolt, and other great spells it SHOULD have. Further, more damage is not the answer, status conditions are. The Rebalanced Compendium, from Brilliant Gameologists, has a wonderful section about increasing damage on spells and giving energy spells status conditions that matter. It's quite nice.
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2009-09-07, 06:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
-
2009-09-07, 06:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Lagren: I took Livers Need Not Apply, only reflavoured.
DocRoc: to?
Lagren: So whenever Harry wisecracks, he regains HP.
-
2009-09-07, 06:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Tide: Ta-da! Linkage!
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2009-09-07, 06:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- London, UK
-
2009-09-08, 03:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Tide, I've been wondering what you think of the Compendium? I've wanted a good rules guru's opinions on it for awhile now.
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2009-09-08, 12:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- California
- Gender
-
2009-09-08, 12:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- On Paper
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
-
2009-09-08, 12:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
-
2009-09-08, 12:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- PA these days
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
No one's yet answered the question. Is it possible, to be a Warmage/War Mage?
Life is a gamble, roll the dice. If your life is like cards, rig the deck.
"Boy, sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don'tchya think?" -Jayne
Greatest number of kills In Valhalla Round 1 with Hsams Goht
-
2009-09-08, 12:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
Well if I take the Zombie and spell Silent Image as example, the zombie does not 'disbelieve' unless it actually interact with whatever is produced by Silent Image. From what I can see, the typical zombie do have a Will Save.
-
2009-09-08, 12:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2009-09-08, 12:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
-
2009-09-08, 01:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
I'm actually going to say no. Warmage, along with Dread Necromancer and Beguiler, are specifically supposed to be more limited arcane base classes than the Wizard or Sorcerer (for very good reason), and it makes sense for the Blaster archetype to be represented in this grouping.
The problem with Warmage isn't that it is a base class, it's just that it doesn't get enough nice things. Armored Mage isn't so hot, even though it is fitting, and fully half of the Sudden Metamagic feats are wasted on the spontaneous Warmage anyway. Warmage Edge is the only unique thing the class gets, and it isn't even that good - a great idea, but it increases MAD, and doesn't offer nearly enough reward for the effort. Past level 6 or so, you're better off ignoring it and pumping other things.
If Warmage had Int-based spellcasting (to complement Warmage Edge), his spell list was considerably better (still blast-y, but at least make it a better blaster than the stock Wizard - remember, a Blaster Wizard is actually fairly well balanced, so if you're removing the utility spells, you can definitely afford to give the Warmage better blasting), and had another unique class feature or two, it would be a solid class. As is, nope.
-
2009-09-08, 01:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
-
2009-09-08, 01:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2009-09-08, 01:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Warmage: Better off as a Prestige Class?
I agree, but I think Int makes more sense for a tactician/mage (which is how I generally see them; I suppose that's not directly stated in the fluff), and at least it would mean that Warmage Edge isn't completely worthless. Yes, they're pretty SAD, but that Single Ability is Cha - not Int. Warmage Edge functions on Int, and is therefore more-or-less ignored. Besides, Int is the better ability in most cases anyway, especially for a non-Conjurer... And like I said, they need better spells, and at least a couple more class features.
Mostly, my point was that the Warmage deserves to exist as a base class. That base class just needs to be better than the Warmage currently is.
-
2009-09-08, 01:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender