Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
2009-09-12, 01:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Experience penalties to balance classes?
if you look at the tier system here, you'll see the basic idea of the balance of the classes. now, in first edition, not all the classes were balanced in power. the ranger was clearly superior to the fighter, and the thief was the weakest class in the game (yes, the monk was still brokenly weak, but we'll get there). they balanced them by them all having their own experience charts. so what if we did the same thing for 3rd eddition? tier 1 would take around 1 1/2 times the exp to level up, tier 2 would take 1 1/4, tiers 3 and 4 would be around normal, maybe 1 1/10 above or below. tier 5 would take 3/4 of the exp, and tier 6 1/2 the exp. thoughts? now, these penalties could be moved around a little, but not much.
-
2009-09-12, 01:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Utah
- Gender
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
Biggest problem will be meshing it with the multiclassing system.
You can call me Draz.
Trophies:
Spoiler
Also of note:
- Winning Entry of Gestalt Build Challenge IV
- 3rd Place in Iron Chef XI (Blade Bravo)
- Judge of Iron Chef XXIII (Divine Champion)
I have a number of ongoing projects that I manically jump between to spend my free time ... so don't be surprised when I post a lot about something for a few days, then burn out and abandon it.
... yes, I need to be tested for ADHD.
-
2009-09-12, 01:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
say you take 2 levels of fighter. that would be 3/4 of the experiance points needed for those two levels. then you take a level of wizard. that would be 1 and 1/2 times the normal experiance for your third level.
Edit: so level 1 to level 2 would be 750 XP (1000*3/4), level 2 to level 3 would be 4500 XP (3000*3/2).Last edited by Charlie Kemek; 2009-09-12 at 02:02 PM.
-
2009-09-12, 01:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
I was thinking about something like this, and it's nice idea IMHO, but multiclassing system indeed should be redesigned.
And I will probably just make 2 Tiers : Full Casters & Everyone Else.
"Everyone Else" aren't really balanced so well, but complicating thing into 6 Tiers doesn't smell tasty.Last edited by Spiryt; 2009-09-12 at 01:58 PM.
Avatar by KwarkpuddingThe subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.
Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.
-
2009-09-12, 02:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
what is the problem with it just being the way it is, just changing with every class you take? a level of wizard will take more XP and a soulknife will take less XP
-
2009-09-12, 02:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Midwest, not Middle East
- Gender
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
As it currently stands, lower level characters get more experience. Combine this with lower level characters reducing the APL and if you give out experience by the book the casters won't be as far behind as you might think.
This will also affect what sort of challenges you can throw at the party. It takes longer for them to get to Raise Dead. A mummy is CR 5, and you need Remove Curse to get rid of the Mummy Rot. That's ok, Remove Curse is Cleric 3 so no problem, right? Except now the cleric is too low level to cast that but a mummy is still a good encounter by CR. There are other monsters with similar problems, ability damage poisons v lack of Lesser Restoration being a large category.
tl;dr Lack of clerical cures for effects monsters can generate mean that CR is further broken.
-
2009-09-12, 02:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
precisely why the healer is now a viable option. you can take a few levels in it, and a few in warmage and make a perfectly viable mystic thurge about the same level as normal. and the CR system wouldn't be used AT ALL. use something else. Maybe that could be made a new version of that too.
Last edited by Charlie Kemek; 2009-09-12 at 02:19 PM.
-
2009-09-12, 02:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
What about using the pathfinder rules for XP - where each encounter is worth a fixed number of XP and subsequent levels cost more XP - you could have tier 1 classes use the slow advancement table, etc.
I think advancement actually worked that way in earlier editions as well, so since that's where this idea is coming from it makes sense
Of course, the question does remain how to make it work with multiclassing. It'd be nice if XP to level for the PF system could be simply worked out as a formula.Last edited by Random832; 2009-09-12 at 02:51 PM.
-
2009-09-12, 03:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
Man, talk about full circle, this is exactly what the rules were in 1st edition AD&D. Classes were way unbalanced - rangers and paladins were fighters with extra powers, thieves were far less capable than in later editions, etc. The different levels of xp needed to level up were the balancing factor. I recall thieves needed the least to level up, paladins the most, followed closely by magic users.
In 3.5, I prefer to adjust the classes than figure out how different classes should progress.
-
2009-09-12, 04:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: Experience penalties to balance classes?
Last edited by Charlie Kemek; 2009-09-12 at 04:01 PM.
-
2009-09-12, 07:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
-
2009-09-12, 07:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007