New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    HalflingRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Manila, PH
    Gender
    Male

    Default 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    Hi everyone,

    i would like to ask for some ruling on the use of charge against the bard power compulsion.

    If a bard(me) casts compulsion on a baddie, I can choose to slide him away from me before his turn but then he can charge me after; or I can choose to slide him after his turn and he can charge and his turn will end immediately thereby rendering my compulsion useless. Either way I lose.

    So is this true: Charge trumps Compulsion?
    My mother says: those on fire should roll.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Tyger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007

    Default Re: 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    Yes, it trumps Compulsion in that the Charge action is a Standard action, and Compulsion specifically states that the target can not take Move actions... so yes, in your scenario, Charge renders Compulsion of less value.

    Unless of course, you use Compulsion to force the target off a cliff, into difficult terrain so his movement is extremely hampered, or through several allies so that Charging you will incur multiple AoOs...

    The bard in my campaign has used Compulsion to great effect a number of times. He's never used it as you are suggesting, to move someone that is already physically attacking him though, particularly as its a Ranged attack, and thus incurs an AoO to use in melee range.
    Last edited by Tyger; 2009-09-16 at 06:19 AM.
    Thanks The Neoclassic for my avatar!

    Stark Raving Dad - a blog about life.

    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by theos911 View Post
    Fighter: I can kill a guy in one turn.
    Cleric: I can kill a guy in half a turn.
    Wizard: I can kill a guy before my turn!
    Bard: I can get 12 idiots to go kill guys for me
    Quote Originally Posted by grarrrg View Post
    Oh, and Person-Man's real name is a little something called "SKYNET"

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    DwarfClericGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2009

    Default Re: 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    Yeah, as a bard your main concern is helping your allies perform better so compulsion is best used when aiding your allies deal with the monsters more effectively.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    HalflingRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Manila, PH
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    The idea was mostly isolation. I thought a single target, save ends slide power's purpose would be to place a melee bad guy outside of melee, where their standard and minor would go to waste. but if they charge, wasted power. if you place the monster in the think of the fight, they can still use their melee attacks without penalty. A ranged powered monster in the same position would have more trouble. since you can only slide them 5, they can still charge back into position.

    finding difficult terrain and a precipice is convenient but is rarely an option.
    My mother says: those on fire should roll.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kurald Galain's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    Quote Originally Posted by cupkeyk View Post
    The idea was mostly isolation. I thought a single target, save ends slide power's purpose would be to place a melee bad guy outside of melee, where their standard and minor would go to waste.
    So slide them behind an obstacle, so they don't have line of sight to anyone to charge.
    Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.

    "I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
    Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Orc in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2007

    Default Re: 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    Being slid is not an action on the target's part. So you can slide the target even after it has charged.

    (In M:tG talk, the sliding occurs in the turn end segment which follows immediately after the charge.)

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kurald Galain's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    Quote Originally Posted by 1of3 View Post
    Being slid is not an action on the target's part. So you can slide the target even after it has charged.
    That's not the point: the point is that this power can't prevent the target from attacking (through a charge).
    Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.

    "I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
    Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Yakk's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Default Re: 4e Charge vs. Compulsion

    I think the fluff is that you consume their move action with your slide.

    So clearly they cannot take their move action, because "you already did it".

    They still get to take their standard action and minor action -- ie, most of their turn still occurs, you only have partial control over them. If that makes sense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •