Results 1 to 17 of 17
-
2009-09-16, 02:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Gender
Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
I'm going to begin a new campaign with my group, and we're a bit unsure on which rules to use. We have two alternatives: begin a Pathfinder campaign, or one using 3.5 Edition, using Core, Tome of Battle and Expanded Psionic Handbook, plus some variant rules from Unearthed Arcana.
Should we choose the second option, we would incorporate some other houserules, such as compulsory specialization for Wizards, prayerbooks for Clerics, adding a small pool of power points to Monks and so on.SpoilerMore precisely we'd like to use Complex Skills Checks, Character Traits, Weapon Groups Feats, Action Points, Spell Points, Incantations and Contacts.
Now, which of the two alternatives would you choose, which would you prefer to play?
-
2009-09-16, 02:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
If you're going to force Wizards to Specialize, I hope you let them take advantage of some of the neat ACFs for specialist wizards in Unearthed Arcana.
I'll toss a vote for 3.5 with the limited book access. I'd play in it. Possibly allow in Tome of Magic, too, if you have it - Binders are fun, and don't skew the power level too badly. Truenamers are just sad, and Shadowcasters try so hard - but Binders are cool.
All in all, though, the 3.5 game experience sounds a little more rewarding.Now if you don't mind, I am somewhat preoccupied telling the laws of physics to shut up and sit down.
I cast irresistable phantasmal killer as a 4th level spell. No save, just die.
-
2009-09-16, 02:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
The latter; every role has a very decent class taking it and there's enough variety to realize a large number of character concepts, definitely larger than what Pathfinder is capable of.
And umm, if you force specialization you'll need to help the smaller schools a bit; like move Teleportation to Evocation. That way it's not an automatic ban.Last edited by Eldariel; 2009-09-16 at 02:56 PM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-09-16, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Fairfield, CA
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
Very much the latter, though the former could also work. However, you toss in Magic of Incarnum in your latter book set and I'm sold.
Wiki - Q&A - FB - LIn - Tw
d20r Compilation PDF - last updated 9.11.14
d20r: Spells (I-L) - d20r: Spells (H) - d20r: Spells (G) - d20r: Spells (F) - d20r: Spells (E) - d20r: Spells (D) - d20r: Wizard class
-
2009-09-16, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
I'd go the latter, and play Warblade 20 or Crusader 20 in a heart beat. Although, it kinda depends on what builds you guys want to play with.
Why no complete series?Avatar by Assassin89
I started my first campaign around a campfire, having pancakes. They were blueberry.
My homebrew(updated 6/17):
SpoilerIn progress:
Prolonged Spell(Fix for Persistent spell)
Weapon Training(replaces Weapon Focus chain)
Shelved:
Ascendant Feats.[New content!]
Finished:
Belts of potionade
-
2009-09-16, 03:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Soviet Canuckistan
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
Just so the thread isn't dominated entirely by the 3.5 advocates, I vote for Pathfinder. We switched from 3.5 with ToB, etc. to Pathfinder and are enjoying the change.
-
2009-09-16, 03:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
Honestly, just go with Pathfinder, add those other books, and make what minor changes you need (mostly, give CMB/CMD to classes that don't advance it currently), and call it a day.
If you are unwilling to do so, then I vote 3.5 with splats.
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2009-09-16, 03:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
Pathfinder has been lovely so far. I'd say go Pathfinder, but adapt any supplementary material from 3.5 that you want. Have your cake and eat it, too!
-
2009-09-16, 03:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
I agree with Fax. In my opinion, Psionics, ToB, Incarnum, and PHBII are the core of fun and balanced 3.5.
-
2009-09-16, 04:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
My group has been doing well with Pathfinder so far. It's rather nice having everything consolidated down to one book (we're not trying the whole 'backwards compatible' thing), and everything seems fresh because of all the little changes. It feels like a 3.5 Core++ campaign, without having to deal with tons of books.
Of course, as DM, I use all 3.5 material to set up challenges for my players...
-
2009-09-16, 04:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- England
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
I'm voting for 3.5!
-
2009-09-16, 04:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Over the Rainbow
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
If you already own all the 3.5 materials, stick with that. If you need to purchase the materials, then go either way.
-
2009-09-16, 05:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
Go Pathfinder, I canīt explain why but it feels completly fresh and new.
My DM once lectured me as why my optimizing gaming style was terrible, why it betrayed everything the game stood for, and how I should be executed and violated for it, i felt terrible. But i felt worst when he sent his fiendish werecrocodile cleic crusader ruby knight vindicator knight of the raven mindbendr to kill my character...I probabyl deserved it
-
2009-09-16, 08:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- The Swamp of Evil
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
Go 3.5, and save a buck or ninety.
"Well, as Captain Leif Meldrock says in Mars Needs Lumberjacks, I'm ready for anything."
~The Hero, The Secret of Evermore
-
2009-09-16, 08:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Gender
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
I would go with 3.5, but that's my personal preference.
Try both!Avatar by Aedilred
GitP Blood Bowl Manager Cup Record
Styx Rivermen, Feets Reloaded, and Selene's Seductive Strut
Record: 42-17-13
3-time Division Champ, Cup Champion
-
2009-09-16, 08:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
I'm rather enjoying Pathfinder + ToB + Magic Item Compendium + Spell Compendium myself right now.
I have neither Incanum or Tome of Magic, but I can say that from what I've read it does not seem like something that would be hard to add in a Pathfinder game.
-
2009-09-16, 09:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: Pathfinder or 3.5 with choice manuals?
Personally, I'd go with the 3.5 material but I might steal some stuff from PF if I were you. Or even just use PF instead of the core books, although I don't like everything PF did personally.