Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
2009-10-27, 04:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
[3.5] Spellcraft and non-standard spells
Rules as written (RAW) state that you can identify a spell as it is being cast if you succeed at a Spellcraft DC 15+spell's level.
ok.
So how would a DM handle a completely unique spell or a spell that has been researched/created by a player (and an NPC is making the Spellcraft check) but the spell is not in "common" usage???
Do they "just know" the spell name if they succeed?
Do they then get a simple description of the spell's effects?
Opinions wanted!!
-
2009-10-27, 04:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- England
- Gender
-
2009-10-27, 04:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Metro Manila, Philippines
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Spellcraft and non-standard spells
Every spell was invented by someone at some time. If it's just a variant of a common spell, I'd just add 2 to the DC to identify it. If it's completely unique, the Spellcrafter MIGHT be able to discern the effects at +5 or +10 DC, but wouldn't know the name.
Eberron Red Hand of Doom Campaign Journal. NOW COMPLETE!
Sakuya Izayoi avatar by Mr. Saturn. Caella sig by Neoseph.
"I dunno, you just gave me the image of a nerd flying slow motion over a coffee table towards another nerd, dual wielding massive books. It was awesome." -- Marriclay
-
2009-10-27, 04:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- Worcestershire, UK
Re: [3.5] Spellcraft and non-standard spells
I would say that rather than knowing the spell that has been cast by name, they know the purpose of the spell. There's no way they'll know the spell's name if it's unique.
I would give them a very rough description of the spell's power for a simple success ("this spell uses fire to deal damage at range") with more detail for a higher check result. If they got the DC + 10, I'd give them the whole description ("this spell deals 1d6 fire damage per level in a 20ft radius spherical burst, at long range").
-
2009-10-27, 04:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
Re: [3.5] Spellcraft and non-standard spells
I assume spellcraft works in the same way that identifying say someone's swimming stroke. Doesn't matter if swimmer calls it the supafly, it still looks like a sidestroke.
Avatar by Assassin89
I started my first campaign around a campfire, having pancakes. They were blueberry.
My homebrew(updated 6/17):
SpoilerIn progress:
Prolonged Spell(Fix for Persistent spell)
Weapon Training(replaces Weapon Focus chain)
Shelved:
Ascendant Feats.[New content!]
Finished:
Belts of potionade
-
2009-10-27, 05:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- England
- Gender