Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
2009-10-31, 11:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
A number of questions/clarifications 3.5
I had a number of funny thoughts and I was wondering what other people thought, so here some of them are:
1. The Tarrasque is a magical beast with 3 int, I was wondering if I could give it class levels... ("The Tarrasque enters a mighty rage...")(Hmm, does it need to have a teacher?)
2. I really want to nerf Spirited Charge, It's like getting a critical with every attack, and they (my players who charge) get a good bonus to attack.
+12 BAB, +5 Str, +3 weapon,+2 charge
I dunno... a wizard can do 72 fire damage with a Maximized Scorching Ray...
3. Does a max-str two-weapon ranger totally rock?
4. Can I do something to make half-elves better? They really suck compared to the other base races.
5. Can an undead barbarian rage? I think it would last 3 rounds b/c their lack of con, but since they can't get fatigued, could they then rage again?
Please answer any, I just wanted all these in a single thread instead of makeing multiple.
Thanks for any/all input.Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
-Groucho Marx
not nale, not-nale. thog help nale nail not-nale, not nale. and thog knot not-nale while nale nail not-nale. nale, not not-nale, now nail not-nale by leaving not-nale, not nale, in jail.
I support LGBT In the playground.
-
2009-10-31, 11:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: A number of questions/clarifications 3.5
- Perfectly legal. Whether it's reasonable depends on which class and who's doing the training, if anyone.
- How's the mount surviving in combat if it's not a class ability? Beyond low levels, mounts are terribly squishy - or expensive - if they're not class-granted. Overall, Spirited Charge is good but not game-breaking, considering that a charge against a desired opponent is trickier than you'd think to pull of. And the increased damage is not all that great without other, more potent shenanigans.
- No. Rule of thumb: TWF is a terrible way to go if you can't get appreciable bonus damage. And damage from a Strength score is not appreciable bonus damage without cheese like Consumptive Field. (MWF is another story, of course.)
- Someone else likely has a better answer, but a start would be to grant them their option of the human bonus feat or the human bonus skill points.
- All of what you've described is legal. And suboptimal without Extended Rage.
Last edited by NoldorForce; 2009-10-31 at 11:54 PM.
-
2009-10-31, 11:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: A number of questions/clarifications 3.5
1. I guess you *could*....but it likely wouldn't make much sense, or be terribly necessary.
2. Don't nerf the meleers. Fighters deserve nice things too, and good charge damage is one of the few things they get.
3. No.
4. Yes. I suggest giving them the bonus skill points a human receives in addition to their usual bonuses. Definitely not overpowered, and since they lose some of the elf bonuses due to being a half elf, they *should* get some of the human benefits.
5. I don't see why not. Not having a con score makes the rage less useful, but more damage is still more damage.
-
2009-11-01, 12:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: A number of questions/clarifications 3.5
Technically, yes, you can. And needing a teacher is purely a optional rule anyways.
Eh. It's melee, it requires charging(a situational attack) and being mounted( mounts are generally very weak).
Additionally, spellcasters doing damage is generally their weakest option, and spell casters can get much stronger than melee. I'd leave it as it is.
Nor really. TWF is generally weak in 3.5, especially without bonus damage of some kind (SA or the like, FE is too situational). Generally, THF is the best style of melee combat to use.
Give them the human skill bonus for starters.
Right on both counts.He fears his fate too much, and his reward is small, who will not put it to the touch, to win or lose it all.
-James Graham, 1st Marquess of Montrose
Satomi by Elagune
-
2009-11-01, 12:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: A number of questions/clarifications 3.5
Could some crazy idiot cast 'awaken' on the tarrasque? If so, that's all you need.
After it's intelligent, it can start acting with a purpose, whatever that purpose is.
-
2009-11-01, 12:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: A number of questions/clarifications 3.5
It already has a 3 inteligence, so it has sentience.
My spelling sucks...
Also another idea:
6. If a spellcaster got swallowed by the tarrasque, wouldn't the carapace ability no longer apply because they are on the inside? (They still would have to make a big concentration check and overcome SR)Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
-Groucho Marx
not nale, not-nale. thog help nale nail not-nale, not nale. and thog knot not-nale while nale nail not-nale. nale, not not-nale, now nail not-nale by leaving not-nale, not nale, in jail.
I support LGBT In the playground.
-
2009-11-01, 12:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Imagination Land
- Gender
Re: A number of questions/clarifications 3.5
Last edited by KillianHawkeye; 2009-11-01 at 12:22 AM.