Results 1 to 13 of 13
-
2009-11-03, 03:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Gender
Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
For a campaign on these boards, I'm currently trying to stat out a concept for a dancer. Right now, I'm just going straight scout for the skirmish damage, and I'm wondering if I'll be too terribly underpowered if I use just one rapier, rather than doing something like going Dervish and dual-weilding scimitars. I'm given to understand that Duelist is garbage, so, are there any other options for a character with only one weapon?
-
2009-11-03, 03:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2009-11-03, 03:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
If you're happy to two-hand your weapon, there are plenty of options. Single one-handed weapon is really poorly supported in this game; best way to pull it off would be a ToB character, most likely a Swordsage.
It also happens to fit the "dancer"-thing quite well. But yeah, given that some SS maneuvers ignore weapon damage entirely and in many, it's not a relevant part of the damage, that should work out pretty well. And yeah, maneuvers like Desert Tempest work for the "dancing"-part (it's really close to Dervishs' Dervish Dance, just doesn't cost you a dozen feats and 10 levels).
EDIT: Ninja'd!Last edited by Eldariel; 2009-11-03 at 03:08 PM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-11-03, 03:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Gender
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Effectively, no. You want *something* in your offhand, even if it's a +5 defending warning dagger that you never use to attack.
As said, be sure to go warblade or swordsage. Strikes will at least make up for your biggest weakness, even if it doesn't compensate entirely.Proudly without a signature for 5 years. Wait... crap.
-
2009-11-03, 03:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Gender
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Hm, it's been a while since I looked at the ToB, but Desert Wind is a really mobile dicipline, isn't it? I picked scout because my mental image of the character has him moving all over the place, in addition to the delicious skill points.
-
2009-11-03, 03:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-11-03, 03:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Last edited by subject42; 2009-11-03 at 03:09 PM.
-
2009-11-03, 03:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
-
2009-11-03, 03:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Really, as AstralFire suggested, one-handed weapon plus fist combo is the most accurate portrayal of one-handed fighting styles. Nick a monk's belt, picking up Snap Kick and 'dual-wielding' them together might help your damage out a bit.
-
2009-11-03, 03:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Tiger Claw does have some nice Jump attacks too though which seem incredibly appropriate. That said, I always associate Diamond Mind the most with swashbucklery. Insightful Strike, the Greater variant, Bounding Assault, Avalanche of Blades, etc. And the whole idea of focusing on one good attack and hitting the weak spot for massive damage seems very swashbucklery to me.
Last edited by Eldariel; 2009-11-03 at 03:14 PM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-11-03, 03:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Yes, swordsage is definitely a highly mobile class. Desert Wind contains a lot of powers that emphasize mobility or even require you to move in order to perform your attack. TOB also has a couple of Desert Wind-related feats that increase your effectiveness if you fight on the move.
-
2009-11-03, 05:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Isn't there a ring that creates a field of force that is basically a shield? The disadvantages of it is that it is a shield that can't be further enchanted, and it takes up a ring slot. I believe the DMG only had one version that gives a 2 point shield type AC bonus, but I don't see why you couldn't have one juiced up a bit to be competitive with enchanted shields for a premium cost. It does take up a ring slot after all. It also has the advantage of no armor check penalty, but I think the same can be said of a mithral shield.
For this sort of character, you would basically have an empty, free hand that isn't holding a heavy weapon or shield.
-
2009-11-04, 12:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Gender
Re: Using a single, one handed weapon effectively
Bladesinger PrC in Complete Warrior is frighteningly specific about using exactly one one-handed weapon. I don't think it's all that great a class in terms of abilities (or entry requirements!), though it fits the 'dancer' theme just fine.