Results 1 to 30 of 56
Thread: Players vs. a Dragon
-
2009-11-27, 03:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Players vs. a Dragon
So, I'm wondering, what would win, a party of 20th level characters, or a Great Wyrm dragon? It seems like the Dragon is expected to win handily, but a nagging suspicion says otherwise.
I would like anywhere from one person to four people to run as a party. I would also like these people to suggest house-rules. We'll base it off of the ToS ruleset. Any changes you would like from that base ruleset (for example, some thing are banned because of the power at lower levels when gotten early), we can work it out and agree on it.
It will be PbP, 3.5, and unless anyone has any objections, or someone wants to volunteer, I will run the dragon. Let's say CR 24, to begin with. It will not be just a dragon, however, it will be a mini-adventure, forcing you to pick something other than mere dragon-killers. You must be able to handle a variety of challenges.
The dragon will use treasure rolled randomly from its hoard. Of the raw coinage left over (not art or magic items, for example), 10% will be used to purchase specific items, chosen by the DM.
Do we have any suggestions, easy things I forgot, advice, volunteers, etc?Last edited by sofawall; 2009-11-27 at 03:56 PM.
-
2009-11-27, 03:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Fayetteville, AR
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
I'm interested in playing a 20th level wizard under the ToS ruleset, preferably in a party of my peers. Running a party isn't my cup of tea.
-
2009-11-27, 04:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Oh, actually I forgot to mention something I was meaning to. This is meant to go somewhat with the other thread. See what different rules, parties and dragons will do to the results.
-
2009-11-27, 04:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Hamilton, ON
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Abjurer 3 / Master Specialist 10 / Initiate of the Sevenfold Veil 7
Dragon loses. Contest over."...short, wrinkled, and superfluous." Yes... yes.
Darkling DND - IRC, PBP, and Gamer Networking, plus Character Profiler.
Now running Low-magic, Sandbox, FR 3.5e DnD. Join #darkling on SorceryNet for more information, or click here.
Let's Play: Siege of Avalon
-
2009-11-27, 04:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Cydonia
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Yeah, it can easily go either way. All a spellcaster needs is a high roll vs. SR and dragon a low roll vs. death. And a dragon can wipe out a party just as easily.
-
2009-11-27, 04:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Fayetteville, AR
- Gender
-
2009-11-27, 04:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- London
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Give them bread and circusses and the plebs wont rise against you. Give adventurers dungeons and trapped chests and they won't waste time looking to ransack your home and kill your wife.
-
2009-11-27, 04:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
-
2009-11-27, 04:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Aberdeen;United Kingdom
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
I am pretty sure the dragon loses every time against a party that optimises. Get a single damage dealer, one who specialises in protecting everyone else and two hardcore debuffers, including dispelling, and just kill the damn dragon. The action economy heavily favours the heroes and if the four casters, at level 20, are not prepared to take down a dragon, they suck.
However, what is ToS?
-
2009-11-27, 04:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Fayetteville, AR
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
The Test of Spite, a heavily balanced ECL13 PvP/Dungeoneering rules set, managed by DocRoc, contributed to by quite a few others.
-
2009-11-27, 04:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Runite
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Test of spite, look for the thread somewhere here
Edit. never mindLast edited by Dusk Eclipse; 2009-11-27 at 04:35 PM.
-
2009-11-27, 04:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Basically an arena environment with cleaned-up version of 3.5 rules, run by none other than Doc Roc aka. Dr_Rocktopus from Gleemax. It hosts a variety of exhibition matches in addition to a sort of tournament for entries to dungeon instances and such.
Started as an environment for settling differences in opinion on class power and such. It's grown quite much, but still handles stuff like the Monk test, Fighter 20 vs. Wizard 13s and other...challenges around the board.
Link hereLast edited by Eldariel; 2009-11-27 at 04:34 PM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-11-27, 04:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- London
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
does it damn well too, reason I hang out on the Gitp boards is cause of the general level of civility and willingness to be proved wrong, Doc Rocs testing grounds not perfect but it's about as close as you're going to get in a shared public space like this.
*gets out popcorn and smoothie and eagerly awaits stompy-smashy action*Give them bread and circusses and the plebs wont rise against you. Give adventurers dungeons and trapped chests and they won't waste time looking to ransack your home and kill your wife.
-
2009-11-27, 05:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Aberdeen;United Kingdom
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Ah, I wasn't familiar with the abbreviation, although I considered thaking the challenge under my wing some time ago. Clearly my knowledge of GitP events is not sufficient yet. Too bad I found myself busy with a number of projects dealing with D&D and my real life. Thanks for the information everyone.
-
2009-11-27, 05:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Metro Manila, Philippines
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
It's really impossible to say at face value. Great Wyrm Reds and Golds are still formidable 19th level Sorcerers. If the dragon didn't advance HD and instead took Wizard and Ultimate Magus levels, you're in for an interesting fight.
Eberron Red Hand of Doom Campaign Journal. NOW COMPLETE!
Sakuya Izayoi avatar by Mr. Saturn. Caella sig by Neoseph.
"I dunno, you just gave me the image of a nerd flying slow motion over a coffee table towards another nerd, dual wielding massive books. It was awesome." -- Marriclay
-
2009-11-27, 05:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Aberdeen;United Kingdom
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Sure, if you don't optimise. I am giving the action economy a chance here and believe the party will, in a way, outrun the dragon. The dragon casts as a 19th level Sorcerer while the party casts as a level 20 caster times four. Whatever the dragons get from their racial HD is not worth four characters.
-
2009-11-27, 05:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-11-27, 05:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Metro Manila, Philippines
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
I said interesting, not an overwhelming "YOU WILL DIE" encounter. I'm certainly aware of action economy, having been burnt by it as a DM.
The OP doesn't specify what the party is, so I don't see why the party is made up of 4 20th level casters.
Granted, one optimized caster could win. If the dragon is optimized to the same caster level, I'd think it boils down to a matter of who rolls initiative first.
Eberron Red Hand of Doom Campaign Journal. NOW COMPLETE!
Sakuya Izayoi avatar by Mr. Saturn. Caella sig by Neoseph.
"I dunno, you just gave me the image of a nerd flying slow motion over a coffee table towards another nerd, dual wielding massive books. It was awesome." -- Marriclay
-
2009-11-27, 05:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Aberdeen;United Kingdom
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Epic spellcasting would naturally tip the scales, but as you said, we might just as well leave it out.
Nevertheless, a great wyrm gold dragon has 41 HD and thus has seven epic feats. Spell stoaway is ineffective, because you have no idea what the players will use, Permanent emanation has only a few decent options and Multispell is still quite limited, because you need Automatic Quicken Spell to make it worth the investment. Sure, the dragon will be a threat and is not something that should be dismissed lightly, but I am still more than confident that a capable party would overrun it.
-
2009-11-27, 06:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
How about, as opposed to a great wyrm dragon, a wyrm dragon and its very old to ancient mate? That would even things up considerably, in my opinion.
The point being, it doesn't make sense for a dragon to act alone. While dragons are proud, powerful creatures (And justly so), if they know the party is a group of incredibly powerful, successful adventures (And why shouldn't he? He's a dragon), he'll have gotten some help.
Also, what if the dragon is fighting in his own layer? Or in other favorable circumstances? A red dragon in a pool of water, a black dragon in a pool of acid, a gold dragon underwater...a white dragon in a freakin' blizzard! Dragons don't simply stand in a cave, arena-style, and say "Grah, fight me!!", when they know they can pick their field of battle and go from there.
A truly cunning dragon (Especially one with access to cleric spells) summons creatures and other allies before or even during the fight, at least to distract his opponents and make them use up their resources. And, don't forget, a dragon of such great age will have immense resources of his own at his disposal. Who's to say he doesn't launch an over-sized Iron Bands of Billarro at the wizard and just take him out of the fight?
My point being, dragons of this age are incredibly powerful, wealthy, and cunning opponents. They won't simply let the adventurers run in and mob them. They will make those stupid, meddlesome adventures bleed, cry, and sweat for every inch of ground into their lair.
-
2009-11-27, 06:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2009-11-27, 06:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Aberdeen;United Kingdom
- Gender
-
2009-11-27, 06:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Japan
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Whatever level of preparation the party gets for this should be given to the dragon as well. Otherwise it will be completely one-sided.
One thing I'm worried about is the wealth. The PCs will have over 3 million gp, while the dragon will have about 170k, far less by a longshot.
RKVs are limited to one extra swift action per round in the ToS ruleset.Last edited by Claudius Maximus; 2009-11-27 at 06:26 PM.
Editor and playtester for Legend.
-
2009-11-27, 06:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
For Spell Stowaway, I was thinking of Time Stop mainly since that's the principal action economy rape PCs have available, and with Spell Stowaway, PCs can't really use it efficiently ('cause the Dragon benefits just as much; spending an action to give you and your opponent an equal amount of turns seems like a bad trade) while the Dragon is free to Time Stop away.
I don't think any other Spell Stowaway is worth it, but I'm fairly sure Time Stop would come in handy. And yeah, the Dragon can at least somewhat match the PCs' casting. PCs cast ~9 and 6 each turn, Dragon can cast ~4-6 9s on its turn and if the Dragon uses Time Stop while thanks to Spell Stowaway limiting its usefulness to the party, he could actually be ahead on actions; provided he doesn't die before he gets a turn (which of course comes down to Initiative, equipment, Wards and so on; assuming a Great Wyrm uses most of its treasure for actual usable equipment and leaves just ~100000 gold pieces for a nice comfy bed, it can have decent defenses).
That said, none of this is true for any chromatic dragons except Great Wyrm Red; that's the only evil Dragon that has 9th level spells without class levels, and that's a CR 27 or something. CR 27 should be pretty tough for an optimized level 20 party. Good Dragons are, of course, better off in this regard with most of them qualifying by Great Wyrm-stage and many of them of substantially lower CR. Since epic feats for non-casters aren't amazing (I mean, Dire Charge and Exceptional Deflection are handy in this environment but other than that...), Dragons without 9th level spell access are just of vastly lower power level.
Of course, if we open sources beyond SRD, things change dramatically with PCs gaining access to a vast number of other action economy rapes and the Dragon having far more trouble containing them all. Then again, the Dragon gets more interesting epic feats like Epic Counterspell which enables infinite free action counterspells and such, so...yeah, things change.Last edited by Eldariel; 2009-11-27 at 06:27 PM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-11-27, 06:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Aberdeen;United Kingdom
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Claudius Maximum: Thanks for pointing that out. Nevertheless, the Cleric would stand at three spells a round against the five of the dragon and we're just talking about one person of the party and the dragon has wasted all of its epic feats. And, as you accurately mentioned, the wealth is a big deal.
Eldariel: If the dragon ever gets the chance to use that. At epic levels I wouldn't go anywhere without Divine defiance, which pretty much nullifies whatever the dragon is trying to do.
How does the Test of Spite deal with Celerities? Just wondering.
-
2009-11-27, 06:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
It requires an immediate action though; the Dragon can cast more Time Stops than the party has Immediate Actions (I recall; I don't think there are relevant ways to get extra Immediate Actions). While Epic Counterspell is an action-free way to stop any spells.
Though of course, e.g. Battlemagic Perception, Eyes of the Oracle, Duelward and various other action-granting spells alter this dynamic greatly.
Through ban in the actual tournament, I recall. Though exhibition matches and the various challenges, depending on parameters, allow it (as their point is to showcase why it's banned, duh).Last edited by Eldariel; 2009-11-27 at 06:38 PM.
Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.
-
2009-11-27, 06:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Japan
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Celerity is not banned in the ToS at this time. You just can't obviate the daze it gives you by any means.
Editor and playtester for Legend.
-
2009-11-27, 06:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Aberdeen;United Kingdom
- Gender
Re: Players vs. a Dragon
Even if the dragon gets the Time stop through, I really want to see it getting past all the defenses the party has in place.
-
2009-11-27, 06:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Gender
-
2009-11-27, 06:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Fayetteville, AR
- Gender