New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 32
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    _Zoot_'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Canberra, Australia!
    Gender
    Male

    Default Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    I'm just wondering, is it a class that can keep up with other classes or does it fall behind and become useless? One of my Friends was telling me that it can be REALLY broken, but i'm not sure that I believe him as it involved direct damage spells =P

    If it is not a good class what would it take to make it playable?

    I'm asking because I love the idea of a combined Wizard/Sorcerer (with more emphasis on Sorcerer).

    Hope all that makes sense....
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Solo View Post
    Smelling nice and mind control are, I fear, two completely different things.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    Actually, I find your opinion perfectly reasonable. I'd be surprised if many people took issue with it.
    He's talking 'bout me!
    Quote Originally Posted by golentan View Post
    And then my father comes at me with the teapot and says "Why. So. British?"
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Gareth View Post
    Hey, I can wait. I'm young with my entire life ahead of me. I'll dream of empires amongst the stars in worlds undreamt of if I wanna :p
    Quote Originally Posted by MasamuneSSX View Post
    There are no citizens, mind bananas. Go back to your control.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Broken Damaged Worthless

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    If you use an early entry trick such as Practiced Spellcaster, it's pretty strong. Sorc 1/Wizard 4/UM 10/something to progress Wizard 5 with Prac. Spellcaster (Sorc) is fun stuff.

    All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Banned
     
    DragoonWraith's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Unfortunately, the "more emphasis on the Sorcerer" bit is going to be hard - the class seems (to me) to focus on alleviating some of the Wizard's weaknesses with a bit of Spontaneous spellcasting. That said, it ends up giving you more spells known for Sorcerer, so hey, there's little else that a Sorcerer would want more. The entry requirements just mean you have to focus on Wizard early.

    At any rate, though, as far as "theurge" classes go, Ultimate Magus is one of the very few decent ones. Yes, it can work quite nicely. Practiced Spellcaster can be very useful for forcing your dropped levels to go to the class you're not focusing on.

    However, you're better off with Wizard/Beguiler, as you get dual Int casting that way, rather than Wizard/Sorcerer. There are no Cha-based prepared casters, so there's no way to get a SAD UM using Sorcerer. Not that a Sorcerer/Wizard/UM is bad, just not quite as good.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Edwin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Denmark
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by arguskos View Post
    If you use an early entry trick such as Practiced Spellcaster, it's pretty strong. Sorc 1/Wizard 4/UM 10/something to progress Wizard 5 with Prac. Spellcaster (Sorc) is fun stuff.
    Do this. Ultimate Magus is awesome. Double the spellcasting, with barely any drawbacks.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Mongoose87's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Edwin View Post
    Do this. Ultimate Magus is awesome. Double the spellcasting, with barely any drawbacks.
    Better than double the casting. You use one side to fuel the other side's meta magic! That is win!
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Ring of Evasion means never playing a monk with monk levels again. There is just no reason to dip that stuff. I know we're all about using every part of the buffalo here, but can we just admit that it's inedible?

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Tyndmyr's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    It's...ok. You can make a good high level build with it, but at low levels, and especially when trying to qualify for it, you'll be pretty gimped. Frigging awesome in gestalt, though.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Sstoopidtallkid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Texas...for now
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyndmyr View Post
    It's...ok. You can make a good high level build with it, but at low levels, and especially when trying to qualify for it, you'll be pretty gimped. Frigging awesome in gestalt, though.
    Not really. Wizard 4 is normal. You lose one CL for the Beguiler dip after that, but for the rest of the game, you're only one CL behind a normal Wizard, so it's not bad. And cheap metamagic is always nice.
    [/sarcasm]
    FAQ is not RAW!
    Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
    Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
    I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Banned
     
    DragoonWraith's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Usually not allowed in Gestalt, though a lot of DMs will allow it if you qualify entirely on one side.

    Anyway, qualifying for it hurts much less than qualifying for any other Theurge (except maybe Eldritch Disciple and Jade Phoenix Mage), so from that perspective, it's actually rather nice for low levels (compared to the others).

    A Wizard 4/Sorcerer 1 is still pretty good, after all.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyndmyr View Post
    It's...ok. You can make a good high level build with it, but at low levels, and especially when trying to qualify for it, you'll be pretty gimped. Frigging awesome in gestalt, though.
    Ehh, gimped is an awfully strong word. You'll definitely feel the lost caster level, but you only have to suffer through 4 or 5 levels before your build starts taking off.

    Sorc1/wizard1 + precocious apprentice or beguiler 1/wizard1 + versatile spellcaster will probably be more powerful than wizard2, simply because you get 2x the spells /day. By 3rd level, though, you're going to really miss your lost level.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Troll in the Playground
     
    OldWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    It is one of the better combo classes, up there with the likes of Anima Mage, Arcane Heirophant, and Abjurant Champion.

    I prefer going Beguiler over sorcerer, since the focus is all on Int. Beguiler 1/Wizard4/UM10/Wizard PrCs 5 with practiced Spellcaster (Beguiler) is great, leaving you only one level behind on wizard casting till ECL 12, after which it's two. If you felt like it, you could grab (and retrain) the two feats from Cityscape that would let you enter at Beguiler 1/Wizard 3, so you would only ever be behind one wizard level of casting, but that is probably unnecessary.

    Sure, losing caster levels sucks, but, like with the Malconvoker, here it's actually worth the investment due to an extra list of spells, a source of "free" metamagic, and access to some of the more interesting spontaneous spellcaster tricks like Versatile Spellcaster.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Wings of Peace View Post
    "See these cookies? Note how while good they taste sort of bland. Now try these, they're the same cookies but with chocolate chips added. Notice how with the second batch we expended slightly more ingredients but dramatically enhanced the flavor? That's metamagic."
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Seriously, can we kill this misconception now? A wizard is never late, nor is he early. He shops for precisely what he means to.


    Winner of Junkyard Wars 31.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Sstoopidtallkid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Texas...for now
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Myrmex View Post
    Sorc1/wizard1 + precocious apprentice or beguiler 1/wizard1 + versatile spellcaster will probably be more powerful than wizard2, simply because you get 2x the spells /day. By 3rd level, though, you're going to really miss your lost level.
    If I was starting that low, I'd not take the 1st level of Beguiler on 1. The extra hit point and 16 skills are nice, but only matter if your build can reach the levels where you get UM. Pure wizard, with a dip the level before you take the PrC, is nearly identical, and far better at low levels.
    [/sarcasm]
    FAQ is not RAW!
    Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
    Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
    I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Tyndmyr's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Actually, qualifying for Sublime Chord ain't bad either. The level 10 starting is annoying, but you only need one level of bard to fulfill that half of the requirement. It isn't perfect(stupid levels that only boost weaker class), but it also grants you access to a ridiculously broad spell list.

    The theurge classes invariably are extremely light on feat requirements to enter, they just require some reasonable skills, and casting. Meeting the casting requirements is the only sticky part, generally.

    I find lost caster levels are generally quite painful early and midgame. It's not until several levels into the theurge part of the build that the added spells of the secondary class really become useful. After all, sorc already gets it's spells a level behind wiz...adding more on top of that means it's well behind what a stock wizard would get.

    That said, if you abuse the feats for wizard sorc that let you cast a single spell as the other class, you can qualify for it while single classed, technically. I leave it to your imagination what fun you can have with that.
    Last edited by Tyndmyr; 2009-11-29 at 12:48 AM.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Sstoopidtallkid View Post
    If I was starting that low, I'd not take the 1st level of Beguiler on 1. The extra hit point and 16 skills are nice, but only matter if your build can reach the levels where you get UM. Pure wizard, with a dip the level before you take the PrC, is nearly identical, and far better at low levels.
    I like hide & spot as class skills, and at level 2, having a passive +12 to hide and +8 to move silent is really sweet. It's like having free invisibility. Being able to assist the party trap monkey in finding & disarming with aid another is also useful. With versatile spellcaster, you can keep the beguiler side relevant as you gain levels.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    _Zoot_'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Canberra, Australia!
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Thanks for the advice, one question, what is 'Practiced Spellcaster' (besides a feat) and were can i find it?
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Solo View Post
    Smelling nice and mind control are, I fear, two completely different things.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    Actually, I find your opinion perfectly reasonable. I'd be surprised if many people took issue with it.
    He's talking 'bout me!
    Quote Originally Posted by golentan View Post
    And then my father comes at me with the teapot and says "Why. So. British?"
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Gareth View Post
    Hey, I can wait. I'm young with my entire life ahead of me. I'll dream of empires amongst the stars in worlds undreamt of if I wanna :p
    Quote Originally Posted by MasamuneSSX View Post
    There are no citizens, mind bananas. Go back to your control.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Broken Damaged Worthless

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by _Zoot_ View Post
    Thanks for the advice, one question, what is 'Practiced Spellcaster' (besides a feat) and were can i find it?
    Well, it's a feat (). It's in Complete Arcane, on page 82.

    All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    _Zoot_'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Canberra, Australia!
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by arguskos View Post
    Well, it's a feat (). It's in Complete Arcane, on page 82.
    Thanks!

    *shoots*
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Solo View Post
    Smelling nice and mind control are, I fear, two completely different things.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Silver View Post
    Actually, I find your opinion perfectly reasonable. I'd be surprised if many people took issue with it.
    He's talking 'bout me!
    Quote Originally Posted by golentan View Post
    And then my father comes at me with the teapot and says "Why. So. British?"
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Gareth View Post
    Hey, I can wait. I'm young with my entire life ahead of me. I'll dream of empires amongst the stars in worlds undreamt of if I wanna :p
    Quote Originally Posted by MasamuneSSX View Post
    There are no citizens, mind bananas. Go back to your control.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Broken Damaged Worthless

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by _Zoot_ View Post
    Thanks!

    *shoots*
    *dies* Punk.

    No, really, it's a good class, and fun too. And, no matter what people here say, playing a Sorc/Wiz or Beg/Wiz and NOT doing an early entry isn't all that bad actually. I've played it as it was intended, and it's still plenty of fun.

    All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by arguskos View Post
    *dies* Punk.

    No, really, it's a good class, and fun too. And, no matter what people here say, playing a Sorc/Wiz or Beg/Wiz and NOT doing an early entry isn't all that bad actually. I've played it as it was intended, and it's still plenty of fun.
    With 8 ranks in spellcraft required, there really aren't any early entry tricks. Beguiler1/Wizard4 works just fine.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Broken Damaged Worthless

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Myrmex View Post
    With 8 ranks in spellcraft required, there really aren't any early entry tricks. Beguiler1/Wizard4 works just fine.
    Hurpdurp. I meant to offset the fact that without Practiced you will never get 9th level casting. Thanks for the correction in terminology.

    All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Chrono22's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Not that there is really a point to it.. but does the feat Practiced Spellcaster from Complete Arcane allow a beguiler to qualify for Ultimate Magus without multiclassing?

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Planetar

    Join Date
    Aug 2008

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Being an Illumian is also a really good choice. It lets you lose no Wiz levels while taking UM and gets you like free Heighten for two levels of spells and other good stuff.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    Flickerdart's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono22 View Post
    Not that there is really a point to it.. but does the feat Practiced Spellcaster from Complete Arcane allow a beguiler to qualify for Ultimate Magus without multiclassing?
    How would it? You're not a prepared caster.

    Some people insist that Wizard with Spontaneous Divination can progress both sides as Wizard. I'm not sure how that works, though.
    Quote Originally Posted by Inevitability View Post
    Greater
    \ˈgrā-tər \
    comparative adjective
    1. Describing basically the exact same monster but with twice the RHD.
    Quote Originally Posted by Artanis View Post
    I'm going to be honest, "the Welsh became a Great Power and conquered Germany" is almost exactly the opposite of the explanation I was expecting

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Chrono22's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Flickerdart View Post
    How would it? You're not a prepared caster.

    Some people insist that Wizard with Spontaneous Divination can progress both sides as Wizard. I'm not sure how that works, though.
    Practiced Spellcaster lets you prepare spontaneous spells as a wizard. Beguilers are int-based, and cast spells spontaneously.
    It's cheesy, but if Practiced Spellcaster is a legal shortcut into Ultimate Magus, it should work.
    I'm not sure, but that might or might not mean Ultimate Magus would advance your beguiler caster levels twice per level.

    This is of course all hypothetical. I'd fully expect any sane DM to smack his player with a nerf bat if he tried it.

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Sstoopidtallkid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Texas...for now
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono22 View Post
    Practiced Spellcaster lets you prepare spontaneous spells as a wizard. Beguilers are int-based, and cast spells spontaneously.
    It's cheesy, but if Practiced Spellcaster is a legal shortcut into Ultimate Magus, it should work.
    I'm not sure, but that might or might not mean Ultimate Magus would advance your beguiler caster levels twice per level.

    This is of course all hypothetical. I'd fully expect any sane DM to smack his player with a nerf bat if he tried it.
    That's not Practiced Spellcaster. All PS does is add 4 to your CL to a max of your HD. It's not a shortcut into UM, it just makes it so all of the lost caster levels are on one side.
    [/sarcasm]
    FAQ is not RAW!
    Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
    Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
    I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Gralamin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Myrmex View Post
    With 8 ranks in spellcraft required, there really aren't any early entry tricks. Beguiler1/Wizard4 works just fine.
    Actually, there is.

    Make sure, at level 3 (or 4 or whatever is required), that you are ready to go into it at level 4 (or 5), if you had 8 ranks of spellcraft. Ensure you have at least 6 ranks in spellcraft, and a few ranks in a dummy skill. Get a level 9 bard to use inspire greatness on you, and then get a psion to cast Psychic reformation on you. Since the bonus hit dice count for purposes of spells, and through transparency powers, you can now allocate ranks from your dummy skill to spellcraft, meeting the skill requirement early. Since max skill ranks is only checked when you assign skills, and are put there by an instantaneous effect, you now have early entry ready. Not sure if it works 100% by RAW, but it's something interesting. (I take no credit for this - it was actually pointed out by DocRoc)

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Troll in the Playground
     
    OldWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono22 View Post
    Practiced Spellcaster lets you prepare spontaneous spells as a wizard. Beguilers are int-based, and cast spells spontaneously.
    It's cheesy, but if Practiced Spellcaster is a legal shortcut into Ultimate Magus, it should work.
    I'm not sure, but that might or might not mean Ultimate Magus would advance your beguiler caster levels twice per level.

    This is of course all hypothetical. I'd fully expect any sane DM to smack his player with a nerf bat if he tried it.
    Er, Practicted Spellcaster allows you to treat your caster level as up to your +4, up to your HD. You're thinking of Arcane Preparation, which lets spont casters to prepare spells.

    EDIT Ninjas!
    Last edited by Thrice Dead Cat; 2009-11-29 at 12:35 AM.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Wings of Peace View Post
    "See these cookies? Note how while good they taste sort of bland. Now try these, they're the same cookies but with chocolate chips added. Notice how with the second batch we expended slightly more ingredients but dramatically enhanced the flavor? That's metamagic."
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Roc View Post
    Seriously, can we kill this misconception now? A wizard is never late, nor is he early. He shops for precisely what he means to.


    Winner of Junkyard Wars 31.

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Chrono22's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Oh, my bad, I meant Arcane Preperation.

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Titan in the Playground
     
    tyckspoon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono22 View Post
    Practiced Spellcaster lets you prepare spontaneous spells as a wizard. Beguilers are int-based, and cast spells spontaneously.
    It's cheesy, but if Practiced Spellcaster is a legal shortcut into Ultimate Magus, it should work.
    I'm not sure, but that might or might not mean Ultimate Magus would advance your beguiler caster levels twice per level.
    I think you mean Arcane Preparation there, which is normally used as one of the possible ways around the increased cast-time on metamagics.

    Edit: Bah, even when you expect the ninjas they still sneak past.
    Last edited by tyckspoon; 2009-11-29 at 12:36 AM.

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Chrono22's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    Still, would it work?

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Daemon

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    A pie factory.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Is Ultimate Magus an 'ok' class? [3.5]

    I played through the Red Hand of Doom campaign module as a warmage 1 / wizard (abjurer) 4 / Ultimate Magus 7 (or was it 8?)...

    It's a very fun class. I highly recommend it. The metamagic flexibility and dual casting progression make for a flexible caster with a surprising amount of staying power (I survived the Battle of Brindol with a few spells to spare!).

    I'd encourage the Practiced Spellcaster method of gaining entry, and focusing on the wizard side of things, but I suppose a sorcerer-focused Ultimate Magus would be fun too. Go nuts!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •